similar to: sshd blocking SIGALARM turns out to be due to tcpd

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "sshd blocking SIGALARM turns out to be due to tcpd"

2004 Jan 29
2
windows and log time with %t is not displayed
Hi, I use the following log format on windows and Unix platforms: from windows batch script: --log-format="%%t [%%p] <recv<%USER_IP%<%USER%<%%f<%%l<%%b" from unix bash script: --log-format="%t [%p] <recv<${USER_IP}<${USER}<%f<%l<%b" Here are examples of the log lines (on one line): windows client: 2004/01/28 [2308]
2003 May 06
0
Samba 2.2.8a not plaing nice with tcpd under Solaris8
I'm having a problem with Samba v2.2.8a under Solaris with tcp wrappers. Here's my current setup: Software: Solaris8 w/current recommended patch cluster gcc v3.2.2 Samba 2.2.8a with the following config directives: --prefix=/server/sw/18 --with-acl-support tcpd v7.6 Inetd.conf lines: netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /opt/common/sbin/tcpd /server/sw/prod_samba/sbin/smbd
1998 Jul 01
4
tcpd anomaly
Salve, I''m protecting hades with the tcpd wrappers and had no problems so far, at least none that I noticed. Today happend something strange. An attacker got a connect on a protected port from a not allowed IP: > Unusual System Events > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= BTW, thanks for that tool. > Jul 1 03:34:56 hades in.null[18321]: twist > slip139-92-93-124.hol.ch.ibm.net to
2005 Dec 23
4
sshd blocks SIGALRM
Gidday everbody, We have just found an interesting issue regarding the sshd daemon on our SuSE system. For some reasons, the /usr/sbin/sshd process blocks SIGALRM as shown in the /proc/pid/status: $ cat /proc/`cat /var/run/sshd.init.pid`/status Name: sshd State: S (sleeping) SleepAVG: 0% [...] SigPnd: 0000000000000000 ShdPnd: 0000000000000000 SigBlk: 0000000000002000 <-- SIGALRM is
2011 May 29
2
nearly-tickless-tinc
Hi, tinc has a fixed timeout of 1 second for select() in the main loop. I think this could be improved. Do you think the following patch goes into the right direction ? I don't know whether pselect() is standard enough (works under "current" linux, however I don't know about the other arches). Maybe a config option is necessary. It's probably possible
1998 Aug 05
6
Problem with TCP_wrappers
Hi, I''m running into something weird here. I''m using RH5.1 with tcp_wrappers 7.6. The syntax for hosts.allow and hosts.deny is: <service list> : <access list> [ : <shell_command> ] Everything works when I _don''t_ use the shell_command. I used the _exact_ line as in the man-pages utilising "safe_finger" (comes with tcp_wrappers), tcpdchk
2001 Jun 18
1
OpenSSH + Solaris + AFS ???
Hello *, sorry if i missed an article which already solves my problem. I need a working configuration of OpenSSH for Solaris 7 (SunOS 5.7) with AFS support. PAM support to use the AFS PAm module `pam_afs.so' and TCP-Wrapper support would be nice. It would be nice to have similar configurations for Solaris 6 (SunOS 5.6), Solaris 8 (SunOS 5.8) and Solaris 2.5.1. I have tested a few
2005 Jan 19
22
[Bug 948] high CPU in sshd after tcp_wrappers deny
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-01-19 20:01 ------- Also worth trying: patch #772 in bug #973 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2015 Sep 12
10
[Bug 2464] New: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 Bug ID: 2464 Summary: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:
2015 Sep 12
10
[Bug 2464] New: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 Bug ID: 2464 Summary: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:
2012 Mar 31
2
[PATCH v6] hivexml: Add byte run reporting functions
This patch adds value_byte_runs and node_byte_runs. Each byte run represents the offset and length of a data structure within the hive, one per node, and one or two per value depending on the length of the value data. These byte run functions also add additional data sanity checks as a hive is being parsed, mainly checking that a node address actually points to a node, and similarly for values.
2011 Aug 13
2
[Hivex] [PATCH v3] Report last-modified time of hive root and nodes
The infrastructure for modified-time reporting has been essentially unused. These changes report the registry time by treating the time fields as Windows filetime fields stored in little-Endian (which means they can be treated as a single 64-bit little-Endian integer). This patch adds to the hivex ABI: * int64_t hivex_last_modified (hive_h *) * int64_t hivex_node_timestamp (hive_h *,
2011 Oct 04
2
[LLVMdev] setjmp - longjmp
On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Khaled ElWazeer > <khalid.alwazeer at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have some code which has sigsetjmp / longjmp. After a longjmp, unreachable >> is inserted, which is fine. The problem is that in the backend before >> calling longjmp, some register was spilled to a
1998 Aug 07
4
SMB printing server problem... HELP ME !!!
-------------- next part -------------- Hello everybody!!! First of all I must say that I'm not an English speaker, so this text may sound a little extrange. I apollogize..... Well, I'm having problems with the SMB printing system. I have spent a lot of time (nearly 15 hours and a houndred of configurations) in it but I could not use it as a printing server. System Configuration: One
1997 Jan 13
4
xinetd v. tcp-wrappers
I am interested in opinions regarding the use of xinetd versus the use of tcp wrappers. The two programs have similar functionality, but I find xinetd suits my needs better. The biggest problem is the age of xinetd, and AFAIK it is no longer being kept up. Are there any known security issues with xinetd? Another issue is that xinetd makes use of a non-standard inetd.conf layout, but
2011 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] setjmp - longjmp
That code should do it, but I realized you only detect setjmp functions by name. My code is calling "__sigsetjmp" not "segsetjmp". You only support these functions: static const char *ReturnsTwiceFns[] = { "_setjmp", "setjmp", "sigsetjmp", "setjmp_syscall", "savectx", "qsetjmp",
2011 Oct 04
3
[LLVMdev] setjmp - longjmp
Hi, I have some code which has sigsetjmp / longjmp. After a longjmp, unreachable is inserted, which is fine. The problem is that in the backend before calling longjmp, some register was spilled to a stack location which is live across the jmp. I mean, it will be live after jumping. The stack location was initialized before the call to setjmp, and is used afterwards. Is there any bug in handling
2005 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] Re: setjmp/longjmp interoperable between llvm and gcc?
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:53:58 -0600 (CST), Chris wrote: >On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Kurt Harriman wrote: >> I would like to build an x86 executable consisting of a number of >> subsystems (mostly legacy C code). One subsystem will be compiled >> to native code using llvm. It calls, and is called by, the other >> subsystems, many of which have to be compiled using gcc
2005 Feb 06
4
Can't get hpa-tftpd working on Slackware 9.1
Hi, I have a question on tftpd on Slackware - I know this is an embedded Linux forum, but I think it still must be the appropriate place to ask. I have hpa-tftpd V0.40 on Slackware 9.1. No matter what I do, I can't get files transferred to the tftp server. I just get timeouts - no messages in /var/log/messages or in /var/log/syslog - just dealthly silence. This is the configuration line
2006 Mar 22
1
tftpd-hpa-0.42 bug when hitting ^C
Start tftp with no host name Enter a host name When looking at the tftp> prompt press ^C $ tftp (to) localhost tftp> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x08b8b9c0 *** Aborted I've attached a patch fixing this issue but I'm not convinced this is the right way to do it. Radek -- Radek Vok?l <rvokal at redhat.com> -------------- next part