similar to: Routing lost

Folks, Ive got two ISP connections that I am using with: --- ip route add 192.168.200.0/24 dev eth2 src 192.168.200.11 table connection1 ip route add default via 192.168.200.1 table connection1 ip route add x.175.244.0/24 dev eth1 src x.175.244.2 table connection2 ip route add default via x.175.244.1 table connection2 ip rule add from 192.168.200.11 table connection1 ip rule add from x.175.244.2

Hello everybody, To make all clear; I am newbee in shorewall, but... I''ve tried to connect two computers by Mandrake Connection Sharing facility. (Mandrake 9.1). Briefly, the problem is that after all that auto-configuration activities the network is completely down, just because shorewall. The result of calling `shorewall debug start` by hand is available at the end of the

CentOS-6.10 We have a host with the following ifcfg file contents: BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST="" DEFROUTE=yes DEVICE=eth1 . . . GATEWAY=X.Y.Z.234 IPADDR=A.B.C.2 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME="LAN Link - eth1" NETMASK="255.255.255.128" NETWORK="A.B.C.0" NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes PREFIX=25 TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no And an aliased ifcfg containing this:

I''ve been using Puppet now for a month or so and I''ve come to a problem that may warrant an additional Puppet metaparameter. I''m advocating the addition of a metaparameter called "preaction" (or something like that), which will perform some arbitrary action before the resource is modified. There may be a way to do this within Puppet already (with some

We have a new install of CentOS 6.7 with infiniband support installed. We can see the card in hardware and we can see the mlx4 drivers loaded in the kernel but cannot see the card as an ethernet interface, using ifconfig -a. Can you recommend an install procedure to see this as an ethernet interface? Thanks On 05/25/2016 07:32 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 25/05/16 03:08, Pat Haley

Hello, I have a big problem with my servers. I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) I lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ? Can any tell me what I can do? thank's for a answer NetworkManager is disabled. -- mit freundlichen Gr??en / best regards,

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

I have a server located remotely running CentOS 5.x. I need to have two IP's on the same interface. So I have this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.194 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet So I added this:

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

I want to seriously work with IPv6 and not have stray IPv4 functions messing with me. So in /etc/sysconfig/network, I commented out NETWORKING=yes. I have NETWORKING_IPV6=yes. In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts I altered ifcfg-eth0, setting BOOTPROTO=none. That was enough for eth0 to only have IPv6 working on it (have IPV6INIT=yes and IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes). But lo had IPv4. So I commented

We just went to replace the bridge/firewall services one one server with the same on another. It's pretty simple, and I literally cloned (w/ rsync) a third server that does this onto the one that will be the new one. Then copied the /etc/sysconfig/iptables from the one being replaced, and brought it up this morning. Nope. We had to put everything back the way it was. The new one sees the two

I have CentOS 4 running on an old (early model) p3 with 64 MB RAM. It is acting as a router and firewall for my LAN. CentOS is doing a really good job with Shorewall + DHCPd - on a 10 Mbps cable modem, I see ~ 9.7 Mbps of throughput even when numerous tcp streams to different LAN hosts are running. I would like to add a virtual interface to one of my LAN interfaces. My LAN interface

I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. I have only 2 network card Interface on server. say eth0 and eth1. I set eth1 a public IP address. so it should in # vi /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1a:4d:83:ad:00 BROADCAST=202.127.29.0 IPADDR=202.127.29.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=202.127.29.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Question 1: do I have to

Some of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers in our environment sometimes get assigned virtual IP addresses (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc). Puppet Dashboard''s parameters seem like an ideal way to define and provision virtual IPs on these servers. One could create a "vip1" parameter on a node, and define a value of the IP address to use for that vip. A manifest could then be written to

CentOS-5.5 # uname -a Linux inet05.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? Jan 13 08:25:31 inet05 nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs

Hi, I'm wondering about the impact of using both dom0 and domU's on a server at the same time. I'm worried about the performance impact of running a Mysql server in a domU and now I'm thinking about moving the Mysql part of a LAMP setup into dom0 and running a few Apache guests as domUs. Since the Apaches will serve mostly from an NFS share they won't have much impact on

Hello all, I'm having unusual difficulty configuring teaming with Centos 4.2. The 2 NIC's are Broadcom. The HW is HP DL360 and there is no teaming driver for RHEL4 since it comes with package (says HP). Since there is no teaming driver from centos (as far as I know), I tried the Broadcom Driver, configured the team file, but the team just wont come up. A Virtual Interface should be up

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 device before eth0, and all is good. Why this should matter is a puzzle - I could not find

Dear Simon, > And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. # pwd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts # diff -u ifcfg-eno1 ifcfg-eno4 --- ifcfg-eno1??? 2020-09-21 17:23:25.576672703 +0200 +++ ifcfg-eno4??? 2020-09-22 07:18:43.160532532 +0200 @@ -3,15 +3,20 @@ ?BROWSER_ONLY=no ?BOOTPROTO=none ?DEFROUTE=no -IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes -IPV6INIT=no -IPV6_AUTOCONF=no +IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no