similar to: Question about d_ino used in scp.c

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

On 18/09/2015 15:23, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:01:32PM +0300, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >>>> >>>> We have pxechn.c32 working with pxelinux.0 to switch between the two >>>> system, but pxechn.c32 under Uefi come up with the folowing error >>> >>> >>> @Developers, please consider using 8.3

On 3/4/20 9:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Plugins and filters may call this to initiate an asynchronous shutdown > of the server. This would only be used in the connected phase — > plugins should still call exit(3) directly for configuration failure. > > It is equivalent to sending a kill signal to self, but it's cleaner to > have an API for this and better for

On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> >> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >> >> But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why >> blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards >> problem. > >

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > For e-mail sent to people, yes. > > But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why > blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards > problem. That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that point at

Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: > On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>> >>> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >>> >>> But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why

On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >>> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder >>>> <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>

Syslinux fail to build with gnu-efi >= 3.0.16 with error: In file included from /host/i686-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/efi/efi.h:44, from /build/syslinux-6.03/efi/efi.h:23, from /build/syslinux-6.03/efi/adv.h:4, from /build/syslinux-6.03/efi/adv.c:29:

On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >>>> >>>> But for what

rsync 3.0.4 will transform a path like '//machine/share/dir' to '/machine/share/dir' when the --protect flag is provided. This causes a problem with Cygwin, where the two leading slashes are meaningful (access of a remote Windows share). [[[ % rsync -s localhost://tela/downloads rsync: link_stat "/tela/downloads" failed: No such file or directory (2) rsync error: some

Hello OpenSSH hackers, The last couple of weeks I've been figuring out how hard it is to replace FreeBSD's <utmp.h> with <utmpx.h>. I don't think utmpx is perfect, but at least it's better than what we have now and at least it has gone through some form of standardisation. I noticed POSIX says the following [1]: | The <utmpx.h> header shall define the utmpx

I have been storing the output of facter in a database with the assumption that uniqueid was actually unique, until I found that it is the same for a handful of my machines. It appears that uniqueid is set from the output of hostid. I checked into hostid and it gets its value from gethostid(). The following link, http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/gethostid.html, states,

'rm -rf /' for klibc Doesnt comply to the standard, but does the job. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/rm.html diff -p -purN klibc-0.172/utils/Makefile klibc-0.172.rm/utils/Makefile --- klibc-0.172/utils/Makefile 2004-08-14 00:24:20.000000000 +0200 +++ klibc-0.172.rm/utils/Makefile 2004-09-05 20:11:14.109062216 +0200 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ MAKEDEPS = -Wp,-MD,.$(subst

Hello , I came across this function *HtmlParser::decode_entities(string &s)* in *xapian-application/omega/htmlparse.cc* which basically does is extract hex value if any or extract number.For extracting number atoi is used and value returned by it is stored in variable "val" , I think so replacing atoi with strtoul would be useful here as number can have larger value although the

Dear all, During a recent package submission, we were highlighted that some lines in our configure script didn't follow the correct syntax. The lines looked like this: x=$(($y/10)) We were indicated at the time that this is because the statement does not use Bourne shell syntax, which is absolutely true, and also that the manual warns about this, which is true again. So far everything

POSIX says in <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/rename.html>: Upon successful completion, rename() shall mark for update the st_ctime and st_mtime fields of the parent directory of each file. ext[23]_rename fail to update st_[cm]time of the target directory if the target file already existed. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab at suse.de SuSE Linux

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=856 Summary: scp hangs on FIFOs rather than erroring Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/246774 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=970 Summary: document -- as option/non-option separator Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/289401 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Documentation

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Philip Lijnzaad wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2005 18:20, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >> What shells are these? > > Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this. I still don't know what you did to be able to reproduce this (and I did ask). And as it is a shell script running under /bin/sh, it must be whatever is masquerading as

On Monday 05 December 2005 14:28, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >> What shells are these? > > > > Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this. > > I still don't know what you did to be able to reproduce this (and I did > ask). It turns ou that I was not quite correct regarding the cause of cd printing the 'new' directory. It is due