similar to: first cut at blockless given/when/then

This isn''t specific to RSpec, but is hopefully on-topic for this list. I like (especially when "ping pong pairing") to write a spec, then write the smallest amount of code I can to pass it (especially when "ping pong pairing"). Sometimes this means hard-coding a return value, which means another spec is needed to prove that the code is really behaving as it

Hi, I wanted to create a list of closures. When I use Map(), mapply(), lapply(), etc., to create this list, it appears that the wrong arguments are being passed to the main function. For example: Main function: > adder <- function(x) function(y) x + y Creating list of closures with Map(): > plus <- Map(adder,c(one=1,two=2))> plus$one(1)[1] 3> plus$two(1)[1] 3 Examining what value

Hi, I''ve been following this thread and I can get the example stories to run with the ruby command. But I''ve been unable to get the example from http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/articles/2007/10/25/plain-text-stories-part-iii to run with all.rb ruby stories/all.rb /home/edh/story/stories/additions/steps/addition_steps.rb:2: undefined method `steps_for'' for main:Object

? Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:15:07 +0000 Iago Gin? V?zquez <iago.gine at sjd.es> ?????: > f <- function(whatever){ > ... > g <- function(whatever2){ > ... > } > ... > } > > If I wanted to debug some thing directly inside f I would do > debug(f). But this does not go inside g code. On the other hand, > debug(g) does not work as g is not a

Hi all, I am trying to debug an error of a function g defined and used inside another function f of a package. So I have f <- function(whatever){ ... g <- function(whatever2){ ... } ... } If I wanted to debug some thing directly inside f I would do debug(f). But this does not go inside g code. On the other hand, debug(g) does not work as g is not a defined function in the

Hi, > 7 for(i=0; i<j && i+j+1<N; i++) { > > 8 for(i=0; i<j && i<N-j-1; i++) { the arithmetic might overflow in one of these but not in the other. Best wishes, Duncan.

Each register is a 4-component (namely, r, g, b, a) vector register. They are actually defined as llvm packed [4xfloat]. The instruction: add_sat r0.a, r1_bias.xxyy, r3_x2.zzzz Explaination: '.a' is a writemask. only the specified component will be update '.xxyy' and '.zzzz' are swizzle masks, specify the component permutation, simliar to the Intel SSE permutation

Rather off-topic, but I'm looking for IP-based KVMs (~16 ports) that can handle both PS/2 and USB hookups on the server side. All of the answers over at Slashdot are a few years out of date and it looks like prices on KVM head units have dropped a bit over the years. Some of the older units only worked with Windows, Internet Explorer and ActiveX. Others like the ATEN KH1516i supposedly

I'm a Libvirt newbie and I'd really appreciate it if someone could answer my doubts. I'm using Libvirt's Java API. My doubts: 1.Currently, I'm able to create a VM on Ubuntu 11.04 using Libvirt functions domainCreateLinux() and domainDefineXML(). Apart fromt the boolean return status of these operations and running the virsh list command, is there any way to SSH in (login) to

> > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:23:52 -0700 > From: "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] A case where llvm created different cfg for > same code > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: > <16e5fdf90808121323g1ae2a2e3lb6c5bd62521df621 at mail.gmail.com> >

Actually the problems that Tzu-Chien Chiu are encountering are similar to what should be done for generating SSE code in the X86 backend and also other SIMD instruction sets. I think LLVM neeeds to add instructions for permuting components, extracting and injecting elements in packed types. If the architecture has instructions which can do permutations for each instruction (for example

Hello Developers, I am considering using SPEEX on an embedded processor that is in fact a DSP with fixed point 24 bit resolution. This DSP is named 'Kalimba' and is present in CSR's product: BLUECORE5. I'm very interested if anybody can tell me if porting is possible (in fact if there are sufficient resources) for implementing a real-time encoding-decoding (duplex). I'm

Hi all, Has anyone seen something like this before: I want to use a laptop as a KVM console. Basically when a technician goes to one of our datacentres, or clients he has to look for a free LCD, keyboard & mouse to connect to a server (no network access, reinstall, troubleshoot failed kernel / HDD, etc). And then hopefully there's an open power socker in that cabinet. So I'm

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote: > I just discussed this with vivek on IRC (and I think we agreed on this): > > Let me first state the motivation clearly to ease later discussions: > As far as the motivation for this change goes: Changing the calling > convention allows us to choose whether a register is saved by the callee or >

We have a few unfinished examples in our code of the form it "should and does do something" do # stuff end it "should do something someday" it "should and does do something else" do # more stuff end Now since I upgraded my gem to rspec 1.8 today, the empty example is failing with the error ArgumentError in "should do something someday":

Hi, What I need to know is how to change revert:true to revert:false from a draggable after I drop it on a droppable so it doesn''t return to its original place. Something like: [CODE] <!-- Draggable image --> <img alt="Product" id="item" src="icon.png"> <script type="text/javascript"> new

I have discovered that a user who has a blank GECOS field in the passwd file under RedHat 4.0 (Colgate) is unable to change passwords. Running the passwd command goes like this: [user@host user]$ passwd Password: [entry of old passwd] New password: [entry of new passwd] [user@host user]$ echo $! 1 [user@host user]$ Setting the name field in the GECOS seems to solve this problem. [mod: While

Hi all, The following only affects people who have bravely begun to experiment with the 2 day-old plain text story runner and definable groups of steps. For those who fit that bill, I just committed a few changes that will require you to make changes to your code. The StepMatchers class is now the StepGroup class. The step_matchers methods on PlainTextStoryRunner and StepGroup is now just

I think we all know that the readability of steps isn''t great right now, and in fact there''s a very recent thread that discusses just that. It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a bit. The basic idea is that you define step matchers, which have a regex, and then you match step names against that regex. Kind of tough for me to explain so I''ll just

Thank you Ivan, your example solves my issue this time through debug(environment(Adder$add)$add) Just for the future, you say Moreover, `g` doesn't exist at all until f() is evaluated and reaches this point. If `f` was a function, it would be possible to trace() it, inserting a call to debug(g) after it's created. How should I call trace() if f was a function? Best