similar to: scp bug: newly created dirs do not inherit sgid bit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "scp bug: newly created dirs do not inherit sgid bit"

2001 Feb 19
0
[PATCH]: Broken scp -p option
Hi, I have found an serious problem when using 'scp -rp'. The usage of the static buffer "namebuf" together with calling `sink()' recursively results in overwriting the buffer np points to. This in turn results in a broken call to `ulimits()' and `chmod'. This patch solves the problem: Index: scp.c ===================================================================
2008 Dec 22
1
sgid bit set on ordinary files mounted via smbfs
Hi, I find that files (not directories) in an smbfs-mounted share always have the sgid bit set. I've looked in the FAQ and HOWTO but didn't see anything. I wonder if someone might suggest a way to fix it. The share is served from Windows 2003 SP2 and mounted on a Fedora 10 Linux machine (samba-client-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.i386) with this command line: mount //wcl-fp1/shared /mnt/shared -t
2000 Aug 02
1
SGID bit in Samba 2.0.7
Hello, we use the SGID bit on Solaris for directories to force setting the given group from the directories above (not the primary group). If we create directories with Samba 2.0.7, the SGID bit will not set on the new directory. With Samba 2.0.6 and below all worked fine. Is there a work around or a bug fix available? Thx Sincerly yours Jochen Duemmel PS: we use Samba for a server
2010 Jul 09
2
difference between stickybit SUID and SGID
i had a small query , whant is the difference between stickybit SUID and SGID , is there any proper site where i can get a clear understanding . -- Regards Agnello D'souza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100709/c7c22588/attachment.html>
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
> On May 18, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote: >> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: >>
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 . It's owned by user "myapp" and GID 9997 and as you can see we have the SGID bit set on this
2005 Jul 29
1
Samba permissions
I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make sense to me. Here is what I have set. /DIR (Unix permissions are 3777) Then in samba I have the following [dir] path = /DIR read only = no valid users @teach @student create mask 3660 directory mask 3770 Then from a windows workstation, I create a new directory inside 'dir', and call it 'teach'. The
2001 May 17
6
scp: Problem when source and destination are identical
If the source and destination file are identical, the receiving scp truncates the file. On the sending end, read() returns 0, and garbage is sent instead of actual data, and the receiving end puts it into the file, which at least confuses the users. -- Florian Weimer Florian.Weimer at RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE University of Stuttgart http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/
2017 Jun 19
1
Bit SGID on directories
Hello,   I have a samba server v4.6.5, it’s a member of a Windows 2003 domain.   I setup a share, in this share I want to set sgid bit on directories. I created a directory with SGID bit on the top of the share, but when I create inside new directories didn’t have SGID bits.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset =
2009 Oct 29
2
Makevars, cc files in multiple directories
Hello, In the src folder of my R package I have a.cc b.cc f/g/x.cc my Makevars.in has all: $(SHLIB) upon installing only, a.o and b.o is build and the final dll is comprised of a.o and b.o How can I instruct $(SHLIB) to pick up its source files from all subdirectories (or maybe a subset, though here it will be all) in src ? Much thanks Saptarshi
2009 Jul 24
2
Tidy symlinks
So, I have a directory of symlinks that I''m managing and Tidy doesn''t seem to be doing much for me in there. Does Tidy ignore symlinks for some reason? If not, does anyone have the correct syntax? Thanks, Trevor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To
2000 Aug 18
0
[PATCH] Support symlinks in scp of openssh 2
I'm fond of the "-a" (archive) option of cp, and I'm a heavy user of scp, so I guess it's inevitable that I would eventually add support for "-a" to scp. :-) Actually, it's a "-L" flag for preserving symlinks, and a "-a" flag that is shorthand for "-Lpr". Please let me know if I'm not doing this right.... I made a great
2009 Aug 23
0
[LLVMdev] x86_64 darwin multilib gfortran testresults
Using the proposed patch for enabling the i386 multilib under the x86_64-apple-darwin build... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-August/025040.html the following gfortran testsuite results are obtained... Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin10 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:
2009 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran test results
The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results under Intel Darwin9 are appended below. Jack Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:
2008 Nov 02
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.4 prerelease gfortran results
Building the prerelease of llvm-gcc 2.4 on Intel darwin9 with the following patch... --- llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c.org 2008-10-30 18:55:45.000000000 -0400 +++ llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c 2008-10-30 18:57:29.000000000 -0400 @@ -157,3 +157,27 @@ { gcc_assert(0); } + + +bool cvt_utf8_utf16 (const unsigned char *, size_t, unsigned char **, +
2008 Jun 09
1
Cross-validation in R
Folks; I am having a problem with the cv.glm and would appreciate someone shedding some light here. It seems obvious but I cannot get it. I did read the manual, but I could not get more insight. This is a database containing 3363 records and I am trying a cross-validation to understand the process. When using the cv.glm, code below, I get mean of perr1 of 0.2336 and SD of 0.000139. When using a
2008 May 28
0
bad error message? .. main.c code 23 .. caused by sgid on dir
This is to suggest a possible improvement in an error message. On a recent rsync transfer I see a message like > rsync: failed to set permissions on ".../somedir": Permission denied (13) for several dirs that have the sgid bit set There seems to be a retry pass, because all the messages are repeated. And then there is (perhaps a summary) line > rsync error: some files could not
2016 May 18
0
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote: > We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: > > drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 . if you notice, there is a '+' at the end
2012 Dec 11
1
Rprof causing R to crash
I'm trying to use Rprof() to identify bottlenecks and speed up a particullary slow section of code which reads in a portion of a tif file and compares each of the values to values of predictors used for model fitting. I've written up an example that anyone can run. Generally temp would be a section of a tif read into a data.frame and used later for other processing. The first portion
2013 May 27
0
choose the lines
Hi, Try this: dat1<- read.csv("dat7.csv",header=TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE,sep="\t") dat.bru<- dat1[!is.na(dat1$evnmt_brutal),] fun1<- function(dat){??? ? ??? lst1<- split(dat,dat$patient_id) ??? lst2<- lapply(lst1,function(x) x[cumsum(x$evnmt_brutal==0)>0,]) ??? lst3<- lapply(lst2,function(x) x[!(all(x$evnmt_brutal==1)|all(x$evnmt_brutal==0)),]) ???