similar to: forwarding stdin/out to remote socket

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "forwarding stdin/out to remote socket"

2005 Mar 26
2
forwarding data ?
Hi, I'm trying to configure ssh to get this behaviour: ssh binds on "localhost:60110" and when a local application connect to that port, all the data are forwarded to the "server". The particular fact is that I can't use port forwarding because I don't have any pop3 daemon on the "server". In fact I'm using a pop3 script as user's shell! $
2018 Dec 20
0
[PATCH v2 03/16] drm/dp_mst: Restart last_connected_port_and_mstb() if topology ref fails
While this isn't a complete fix, this will improve the reliability of drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() pretty significantly during hotplug events, since there's a chance that the in-memory topology tree may not be fully updated when drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() is called and thus might end up causing our search to fail on an mstb whose topology refcount has reached 0,
2019 Jan 09
0
[PATCH v5 07/20] drm/dp_mst: Restart last_connected_port_and_mstb() if topology ref fails
While this isn't a complete fix, this will improve the reliability of drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() pretty significantly during hotplug events, since there's a chance that the in-memory topology tree may not be fully updated when drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() is called and thus might end up causing our search to fail on an mstb whose topology refcount has reached 0,
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When
2018 Dec 18
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > > seeing if things
2018 Dec 19
1
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the
2019 Jan 09
0
[PATCH v5 06/20] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When
2019 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v4 02/16] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When
2018 Dec 14
2
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme
2006 Nov 04
3
Three processes for each mongrel server?
Hi everyone. Zed, thanks for Mongrel. I''ve been running mongrel on my WiFi cafe site (http://wifi.earthcode.com), and it''s been great. It handled a front-page digg a few weeks ago without blinking. However, I''m setting up a staging environment right now, and I''m getting what looks like three mongrel processes *all listening on the same port* for each mongrel
2008 Mar 24
2
Commands failing silently?
Hello all: I have a couple CentOS 4 servers (all up-to-date) that are having strange command failures. I first noticed this with a perl script that uses lots of system calls. Basically, sometimes a command just won't run: thoth(52) /tmp> ls thoth(53) /tmp> ls thoth(54) /tmp> ls thoth(55) /tmp> ls learner lost+found/ thoth(56) /tmp> ls learner lost+found/ thoth(57)
2006 Apr 18
1
Browsing Issues
Hi - I'm having some problems with network browsing using a Samba PDC (3.0.22) and I'd appreciate any hints that might push me in the right direction. One of the problems is that I am on a very crowded subnet that is being used by several different groups. There are a two separate WinNT/2000-style domains active on this network as well as an AD domain controller. Here are the
2007 Aug 29
0
poor performance with bonding in round-robin mode (only samba affected)
Hi, samba 3.0.24, debian etch I'm seeing a strange effect with samba and traffic over a bond0 interface in round robin mode. 2 server each with 2 GbE interfaces as bond0 device ind rr mode. netio benchmark: NETIO - Network Throughput Benchmark, Version 1.26 (C) 1997-2005 Kai Uwe Rommel TCP connection established. Packet size 1k bytes: 182840 KByte/s Tx, 197599 KByte/s Rx. Packet size
2007 Jun 04
3
Expected ... to define (rails version 1.2.2)
Hi, I''m having a mysterious problem that occurs when I''m using Rails 1.2.2. My app works fine when the environment.rb file reads: RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''1.1.6'' When I change this to: RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''1.2.2'' and try to load http://<mydevhost>:3000/srs/, I get the following traceback in the developer log: Expected
1999 Dec 08
0
Getting rid of printer temp files
You need to add a semicolon and then the command rm %s to the end of your print command. However, you'll need to delete the files already there manually from Unix. print command = /bin/pt %p %s %M %U %T %a %v %m %I %d;rm %s Steve Litt At 03:22 AM 12/09/1999 +1100, you wrote: >I've set up Samba 2.0.6 for use as a print server on our company NT >network. For some reason, the print
2000 Jan 12
0
Printer fun - controlling queue from Windows NT clients
I have set up a Samba server to act as our lab's print server for a bunch of NT clients. It works quite well, except for one thing. Nobody can control the print queue from Windows. When a job is sent, it never shows up in the Windows print queue window, even when there are lots of other jobs ahead of it. Using lpq under Linux shows the jobs just fine. Lprm et al work perfectly too. So I assume
2018 Dec 20
22
[PATCH v2 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2017 Aug 21
2
Control multi-threading in standard matrix product
Hi Tomas, Thanks for your answer. Indeed, I checked and my R-3.4.1 installed from the ubuntu repository use 'libopenblasp-r0.2.18.so' while my R-3.3.2 that I did compiled on my machine use 'libRblas.so' which explain the difference of behavior. I will use RhpcBLASctl to avoid issue when combining matrix product and other multi-threading package. Maybe this point regarding
2019 Jan 09
27
[PATCH v5 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2017 Aug 21
1
Control multi-threading in standard matrix product
Hi Ista, Maybe a little comment in the 'matmult {base}' doc page or on the 'options {base}' in the field 'matprod' would be useful to remind users to be cautious regarding BLAS multi-threading? I understand why this is a BLAS related issue and not directly an R related issue. Nonetheless, my concern was for non-advanced R users, that may don't even know what BLAS