similar to: testing, please ignore

Hi, I'm sure you have all noticed the recentincrease in spam making it through the list filters. I guess this is due to the spammers adopting techniques specifically intended to evade SpamAssassin. Over the next week, I will be adding add some extra anti-spam measures to the list. Hopefully this will stop this abuse. Until then, patience please. Thanks, Damien Miller

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The list server at shorewall.net is seeing a small but steady stream of quaranteened messages from anti-spam software that is asking the list server to respond and thus register itself as a legitimate source of email. I also receive these requests personally. Here''s an example: -

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1788 Summary: simple option to ignore known_hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: avalon at

It compiled with no problems on both UnixWare 7.1.1 and AIX 4.3.3 by running './configure' Thanh > -----Original Message----- > From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at mindrot.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:02 PM > To: Gilbert.R.Loomis at saic.com > Cc: nikhil at mailsafe.org; openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Please test this snapshot > > > On

When making success / failure reports, could you please include the 'host system type' as reported by configure. Reports in this format can be processed with uniq :) So far I have success reports from: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 mips-sgi-irix5.3 i686-pc-linux-gnu Missing: SunOS 4.x HP/UX 11 NeXT SCO SNI/Reliant Unix -- | "Bombay is 250ms

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2212 Bug ID: 2212 Summary: openssl version check should ignore status nibble Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, ?smail D?nmez wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > OpenSSH 6.8 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing > > on as many platforms and systems as possible. This release contains > > some substantial new features and a number of bugfixes. >

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Darren Tucker wrote: > I noticed this error log spam on the tinderbox when looking at one of the > failures. It happens with Unix domain socket forwarding is requested: > > debug1: channel 1: new [forwarded-streamlocal at openssh.com] > get_socket_address: getnameinfo 1 failed: ai_family not supported > get_sock_port: getnameinfo NI_NUMERICSERV failed:

Hi, OpenSSH 6.0 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This release contains a couple of new features and changes and bug fixes. Testing of the new sandboxed privilege separation mode (see below) would be particularly appreciated. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The

Testing some more anti-spam measures. Please ignore. -d

This to announce a test release of 2.1.0p1 before making it widely available. This release includes many fixes to problems reported over the last week. In particular: - spurious error and coredumps caused by the inbuilt entropy gathering - RSAref detection - Compilation fixes for Solaris and others It also contains (completely untested) support for compiling without RSA support. This may be

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-05-09 14:41:19 --- The

Hello All, The changing of group for the root results in the following message with OpenSSH 3.9p1 "permanently_set_uid: was able to restore old [e]gid" The following change in uidswap.c fixes me the problem. /* Try restoration of GID if changed (test clearing of saved gid) */ - if (old_gid != pw->pw_gid && + if(getgid() != pw->pw_gid && (setgid(old_gid)

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> writes: > We don't plan to remove this check. Accidental key exposure is still an > unfortunately common problem and, while this check isn't perfect, I'm > pretty sure that it avoids enough real-world misconfiguration to > justify it's continued existence. Maybe the check could have a configuration option to disable it? That

On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Mate Wierdl wrote: > This email did not have the list address in the Cc: or To: fields. > > Perhaps the list maintainer would consider putting filter that would > just bounce such messages to sender? I want to keep the list as open as possible, but will close it if it gets spammed repeatedly. My definition of "repeatedly" at the moment is two times

Unfortunately evil spammers have managed to defeat all the anti-spam measures we've tried with the wiki. So it is with regret that we have had to disable new wiki account self-registration. We do still welcome contributions from anyone interested in adding wiki content. We just ask that you send a mail to the main devel mailing list (libvir-list@redhat.com) to request an account be created

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414 Bug ID: 2414 Summary: ControlMaster directive should be ignored on Cygwin Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Cygwin on NT/2k Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee:

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > > From: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> > > Thanks for testing - are you able to see if there's anything in > > the server logs? > > Hi Damien, > > I've been able to reproduce being unable to successfully connect to > EC2 instances launched with either Amazon Linux 2 AMI (HVM) or Amazon > Linux AMI

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:43 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > Could you try turning off IPQoS setting (ssh -oIPQoS=none ...) and seeing > > whether that makes any difference? > > Yes - setting -oIPQoS=none on the client allows for a successful > connection to the server. > > Would you still like me

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2454 Bug ID: 2454 Summary: wishlist: please add support for RFC 4432 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at