similar to: mysteries of client_process_input()

Hello list, after some weeks of operation and updates one server of mine needed a reboot. Now authentification with public key causes a segfault. System information: 2.6.8-gentoo-r4 x86_64 AMD Dual Opteron(tm) Processor 242 AuthenticAMD Debugging information: // ssh fom node2 to node1 # ssh -vvv node1 OpenSSH_3.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 debug1: Reading configuration data

Dear openssh developers, Sorry to bother you with this, but I am stumped! ssh client version: OpenSSH_3.9p1 NCSA_GSSAPI_3.5 GSI, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 sshd server version: OpenSSH_4.6p1-hpn12v17 NCSA_GSSAPI_GPT_4.0 GSI, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 The client/server interaction hangs just at the very end, after authentication is complete. Here are a few lines of ssh -v -v -v output:

Hello, I am new at ssh, think it is a simple config problem, but have not found the error. Wenn I connect from an client (winpc vai cygwin) to server A (hpup) the connectionon and xlogo ist okay. Wenn I connect from the same client to server B I got the following error message. The problem is only by starting xlogo, the connection via ssh to Server A+B ist okay. The sshd_config on server a+b is

Hello I was wondering why I cant set inet6,inet - like Protocol version 2,1 - it would be nice if I would be able to set a kind of prefer mode for IPv6 as for protocol 2. But only one argument is accepted: inet6, inet or any. At least that is what the manpage tells me, I also tested it - no way. Why is this feature not included? Will it be included? If you think it's my mistake then please

I tried to transfer a CD image (around 600Mb ) from a local network linux machine to a windows machine with the cygwin sftp. The transfer is very slow. It did not go beyond 15KB/s But I did transfer it just with ssh and it was pretty quick. ssh logu at 192.168.1.52 "cat sysrec.iso" > sysrec.iso What could be the problem. I have switched off Antivirus, firewall etc. The version of

Hi :-) When i use scp or sftp with password login, it dont com back fbeckman at zvadm6:/home/fbeckman $ scp /etc/hosts root at devil3:/var/tmp/ Password: hosts 100% 283KB 283.4KB/s 00:00 .... <sleep> ^CKilled by signal 2. fbeckman at zvadm6:/home/fbeckman $ Only Ctrl C helps Exsample 2: ssh devil3

Hi, when trying to optimize socket transfer rates under Cygwin, it turned out that the underlying WinSock implementation is surprisingly sensitive to buffer sizes. The latest Cygwin from CVS is now setting the socket receive/send buffers (SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF) to 64K, rather than keeping them at their default values of 8K which thwarts data transfers a lot. While testing I still had the problem

Hello there, We are using OpenSSH_3.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 on various Solaris boxes with PAM and an LDAP server back end. Recently we have added a requirement for users to have complex passwords. The problem is, if a user's password has expired, when they log in they are prompted for a new password (good) but if they enter a non-complex new password the session is closed rather than

Hello, I was browsing the code for memdisk (I want to adjust it to my hardware) and noticed a couple of things that I am struggling to understand. I would appreciate if someone could clarify the following mysteries to me: 1) _binary_memdisk_bin_start[], _binary_memdisk_bin_end[] and _binary_memdisk_bin_size[]; These variables are declared (as extern const chat in 'setup.c')

I've never been able to figure this one out: llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:938: virtual void llvm::PMDataManager::addLowerLevelRequiredPass(llvm::Pass*, llvm::Pass*): Assertion `0 && "Unable to handle Pass that requires lower level Analysis pass"' failed. In the past, I've resolved this by disabling random addRequired calls in the offending Pass, even when

On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:27 PM, David Greene wrote: > I've never been able to figure this one out: > > llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:938: virtual void > llvm::PMDataManager::addLowerLevelRequiredPass(llvm::Pass*, > llvm::Pass*): > Assertion `0 && "Unable to handle Pass that requires lower level > Analysis > pass"' failed. > > In the past,

From experience, an important point that is often forgotten is that the order of declaration of dependencies matter. If you declare that you require pass A, and then pass B, and B doesn't preserve A, you'll get an error like this. Just some advice from having had similar problems in the past. --Owen On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > > > On Jan 28,

Dear All, I had a similar error back in December; there are a number of email exchanges about it on llvmdev in December 2007; a search through the archives might shed some light on my PassManager does this. If you're updating a pass from pre-LLVM 2.0 to post-LLVM 2.0, you should be aware that the pass manager in LLVM 2.x is used only for scheduling dependent *analysis* passes. If you

Ok, thanks! I'm copying llvmdev again because others had asked about this as well. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.org/ On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > >> Devang, >> >> I had asked earlier what the message about "lower level analysis >> info" meant.

Hi, I've had some strange recent behaviour from ssh (OpenSSH_3.9p1 Solaris 5.8). I have an application that runs a script that run a remote command over ssh, however rather than running the command ssh tried to run openwindows (an xsession app, i think). Every time the application ran the command the same issue would occur, until the application was restarted. The command it should have been

In my controller...this code works def list2 first_name = params[:client][:first_name] @myclients = Client.find(:all, :conditions => ["first_name = :first_name", {:first_name => first_name}]) end this code doesn''t... def list2 first_name = params[:client][:first_name] if first_name searchstring = ''["first_name =

Anyone know any issue with OS X 10.4 and CentOS with ssh or any connectivity issue with: OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 vs OpenSSH_3.9p1?

Hello, I'm trying to setup an Asterix PBX solution in our office. We plan to have 5 active lines open available at any point in time. We'd like to use VoIP Phones, and possibly Software Based phone (*NIX/Windows enviroment). I was researching the various cards and I think I'd want to go with the Digium TDM40B - 4-port. However, I can't figure the differences between FXS &

On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >> >> So what does this assert mean, exactly? > > In simple word, pass manager is unable to fulfill your request. Can you explain this one in complex words then? :^) I've encountered the same problem. --Vikram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, for some days now I am/was fighting with an annoying problem. I have to support an environment where RhostRSAAuthecntication via /etc/ssh/sshd_known_hosts is used for password-less login. This works fine with RH7.3 (and RH8) and openssh versions openssh-3.1p1-3 (and openssh-3.4p1-2). Our customer has now requested an upgrade to RH9. That comes with openssh-3.5p-11 and the password-less