similar to: OpenSSH and Solaris 9/Native LDAP

On 21 June 2013 19:01, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Anyhow, I just did a quick experiment with 0-size block devices, and they seem > to work for me, although trying to mount the device yields the confusing > message, "mount: mounting /dev/vda on mount failed: Invalid argument". I'm confused -- what's the significance of zero size block

On 21 June 2013 19:01, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Anyhow, I just did a quick experiment with 0-size block devices, and they seem > to work for me, although trying to mount the device yields the confusing > message, "mount: mounting /dev/vda on mount failed: Invalid argument". I'm confused -- what's the significance of zero size block

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 08/27/2014 12:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Christopher Covington >> <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Virtme looks interesting. If it's any use, here is my modest QEMU command line > collection. > >

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 08/27/2014 12:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Christopher Covington >> <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Virtme looks interesting. If it's any use, here is my modest QEMU command line > collection. > >

On 21 June 2013 19:45, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > You were proposing to use a valid/existing MagicValue/Version/VendorID with a > special DeviceID that does nothing. I'm saying why not use a valid/existing > MagicValue/Version/VendorID/DeviceID with a special parameter setting, size=0, > that does nothing? Ah, I see. Well, it sounds from your

On 21 June 2013 19:45, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > You were proposing to use a valid/existing MagicValue/Version/VendorID with a > special DeviceID that does nothing. I'm saying why not use a valid/existing > MagicValue/Version/VendorID/DeviceID with a special parameter setting, size=0, > that does nothing? Ah, I see. Well, it sounds from your

On 20 June 2013 13:58, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:29 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> 1. One question I've run into is: what should a virtio-mmio transport >>> with no backend look like to the guest OS? The spec as written >>> seems to assume that there's always some backend present. >>>

On 20 June 2013 13:58, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:29 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> 1. One question I've run into is: what should a virtio-mmio transport >>> with no backend look like to the guest OS? The spec as written >>> seems to assume that there's always some backend present. >>>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I would like to standardize on a very simple protocol by which a guest >> OS can obtain an RNG seed early in boot. >> >> The main design requirements are: >> >> - The interface should be

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I would like to standardize on a very simple protocol by which a guest >> OS can obtain an RNG seed early in boot. >> >> The main design requirements are: >> >> - The interface should be

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:03 PM, james northrup<northrup.james at gmail.com> wrote: > CC="p llvm-gcc-4.2 `llvm-config --cflags` -march=i386  --emit-llvm -O0 >  -c -I$PLAT/include -I$ROOT/include -I$ROOT/utils/    include" > LD="p llvm-ld `llvm-config --ldflags --libs all  `" > AR="p llvm-ar crvs" Using llvm-ar+llvm-ld is likely to give you bad

On 21 June 2013 17:02, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Would using CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO_CMDLINE_DEVICES enumeration > instead of device tree be any easier? My general view is that the kernel command line is the user's to manipulate, and that QEMU shouldn't touch it at all (just pass it through). (Conversely, QEMU shouldn't require the user to specify

On 21 June 2013 17:02, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Would using CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO_CMDLINE_DEVICES enumeration > instead of device tree be any easier? My general view is that the kernel command line is the user's to manipulate, and that QEMU shouldn't touch it at all (just pass it through). (Conversely, QEMU shouldn't require the user to specify

Supposedly On2 transferred their Video Recorder and TrueCast5 streaming server into opensource along with VP3. Theora is obviously the VP3 project, and while I can find nothing on Xiph about it, the recorder source is offered on vp3.com; but I can find nothing on Xiph or vp3.com about what happened to Truecast5. I contacted On2 about whether TrueCast5 was really going to be open source, and they

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 08/27/2014 11:50 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:11:15AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> On Aug 26, 2014 11:46 PM, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 08/27/2014 11:50 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:11:15AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> On Aug 26, 2014 11:46 PM, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha

Hello, My name is Travis Northrup. I would like to contribute documentation on CentOS compatible control panels. I have 12 years technical experience and have used most if not all control panels currently available, free and commercial. The main control panels that I can immediately begin documenting are Virtuozzo, OpenVZ, cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, Webmin. Others I can begin documenting as I go

I am trying to find a good how-to on setting up samba to use Windows 2003 for authentication, if anyone knows of a good link let me know. I am using RedHat ES 3 and our Windows is running in native mode with NT style authentication allowed. I cant use ADS and Kerberos because the current version of Kerberos on my RH server is 1.2.7 and from what I have read I need 1.3+ in order for it to work

The section is .text, so I assume it’s got IMAGE_SCM_CNT_CODE set. The problem is the symbol is marked (read & execute), but the test is (read & !write), so the symbol gets marked as ST_Data instead of ST_Other. From: David Majnemer [mailto:david.majnemer at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 5:44 PM To: Ted Woodward Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

Hello list, Recently I've rebuilt our Windows 2000 DCs to Windows 2003 SP1 DCs that my 3.0.14a, mit-krb5-1.3.6, openldap-2.1.30 Gentoo box is a part of. Since then, on the Samba box I can getent group, getent passwd, wbinfo -t, wbinfo -g, wbinfo -u, etc. properly but anyone who accesses the shares on the Samba member server gets prompted for a password. The logs are as follows: