similar to: Trying regression tests

Hi, We are preparing to release another stable OpenSSH soon, so once again we are asking for your help in testing CVS snapshots. Changes include: * ssh(1) now allows the optional specification of an address to bind to in port forwarding connections (local, remote and dynamic). See the -L, -R options in the ssh(1) man page as well as LocalForward and RemoteForward options in

Well, after digging around and thinking some more, I'm giving up on the idea of preallocating a TTY to get post-auth privsep working on Tru64. I don't think it will work, because just allocating a TTY doesn't fix the problem - there's no valid way to tie that TTY back to the client process (because it hasn't requested a TTY yet and may not ever do so). The problem is that the

Hi All. OpenSSH 4.1 will be released in the next couple of weeks and we invite interested parties to test a snapshot. The changes since 4.0 are mostly bugfixes, for a detailed list see http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Running the regression tests supplied with Portable does not require installation and is a simply: $ ./configure && make tests Testing on suitable

Hi All. OpenSSH is getting ready for a release soon, so we are asking for all interested parties to test a snapshot. Changes include: * sshd will now re-exec itself for each new connection (the "-e" option is required when running sshd in debug mode). * PAM password authentication has been (re)added. * Interface improvements to sftp(1) * Many bug fixes and improvements, for

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306 ------- Additional Comments From cmadams at hiwaay.net 2002-06-28 00:31 ------- I'm not seeing this on Tru64 4.0G or 5.1A with OpenSSH 3.4p1. What does "rsh [server]" say? Are you using IPv6? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

The ls_file function in sftp-server.c calls snprintf with "%8llu" as part of the format string and a "unsigned long long" type argument. The "%ll" format is not a valid format on Tru64 (at least 4.0F). Apparently it can confuse snprintf as well - sftp-server will segfault and core dump if the user types "ls". This isn't really a needed format string on

Well, I had just finally gotten around to downloading a snapshot to test the latest on Tru64 a couple of days ago but hadn't had a chance to build it yet, and 3.7p1 has now been released. Sigh. The problem is that Tru64 setreuid() and setregid() are broken, so privsep doesn't work. This could also be a security problem for SIA authentication in general (any version of OpenSSH on Tru64,

1) Thank you to whoever makes these available. 2) I have a problem with the SRPMS, they will not --rebuild on a RedHat 6.2 system. Can anyone help me to get this to build here? [root openssh]# rpm --rebuild openssh-3.0.1p1-1.src.rpm Installing openssh-3.0.1p1-1.src.rpm line 74: Unknown tag: 0.9.5a Some Info: [root openssh]# rpm -qa | grep rpm rpm-python-3.0.5-9.6x rpm-build-3.0.5-9.6x

The Cray and tru64 patches I have, have been applied. Unless there is any major "oh my god it does not work". I believe 3.6 should now be ready for release soon. I'd like to thank everyone for providing feedback on the status of their their platform. Hopefully, we have not missed any platform that is commonly used. - Ben

I have "PermitRootLogin no" in my sshd_config, but under Tru64 and SIA, the root login attempts still get passed to the SIA system (so I get lots of warnings about failed root logins). On systems with a "max failed attempts" setting, the root account can be locked out this way. I started looking at the code, and I'm not sure I understand what I see. In auth-passwd.c,

I am just looking for a quick answer as to whether or not OpennSSH is compatible with Digital Unix Tru64 v 4.0F. Hing Fei Wong Systems Engineer Building 100, M1309 Valley Forge, PA Admin # 4-6242 -----Original Message----- From: Darren Tucker [mailto:dtucker at zip.com.au] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 3:53 AM To: Wong, Hing Fei Cc: www at openbsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH compatibility with

Hi - We have been fighting this issue quite some time now and a posting on the general list some months ago did not provide any answers. So I thought the developers may have an insight. We are in a Tru64 4.0F environment, running C2 security and TCP Wrappers. We are using OpenSSH_2.5.1p2 OpenSSL 0.9.5 28 Feb 2000 Zlib 1.1.3 for remote sessions and all works ok with ssh but

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:00:10 -0600 > From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> > Subject: Upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability > To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com > Cc: announce at openbsd.org > Cc: dsi at iss.net > Cc: misc at openbsd.org > > There is an upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability that

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:00:10 -0600 > From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> > Subject: Upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability > To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com > Cc: announce at openbsd.org > Cc: dsi at iss.net > Cc: misc at openbsd.org > > There is an upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability that

Hi, We would like to make one of our periodic releases shortly, so once again we are asking for readers of this list (or anyone else) to download and test a CVS snapshot of OpenSSH on your favourite platforms. The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable snapshots are available the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html#ftp in the

Hi, We would like to make one of our periodic releases shortly, so once again we are asking for readers of this list (or anyone else) to download and test a CVS snapshot of OpenSSH on your favourite platforms. The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable snapshots are available the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html#ftp in the

I have an old (1997) Best Ferrups (model FE18KVA) that I am trying to monitor for the first time, but all the Best drivers fail to communicate with it. In ups_sync() in bestuferrups.c and bestfcom.c, the "time" command is sent and a one-line response is read. However, on my UPS, that command returns the current time and then prompts for a new time setting. I worked around that by just

I had a power hiccup yesterday and a server connected to a Best Ferrups 18KVA shutdown. The problem is that the UPS is reporting remaining runtime in minutes but nut treats it as seconds (so nut thought it only had 46 seconds left). Simple patch: diff -urN nut-2.2.1-dist/drivers/bestfcom.c nut-2.2.1/drivers/bestfcom.c --- nut-2.2.1-dist/drivers/bestfcom.c 2008-06-13 14:04:07.000000000 -0500

Is it possible to have memdisk emulate multiple drives? Here's why I'm asking: I have a Dell server that I replaced the motherboard. I want to reset the service tag to the correct tag for the system, and the only way to do that is to run a Dell tool under DOS. I have downloaded the tool, but it is doubly-wrapped: a self-extracting ZIP file (which I unzipped under Linux) which contains a

If a user doesn't have a ~/mail directory and logs in, the directory is created for them. However, it is created with insecure permissions, 0770 (full group access). The problem is this bit in src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-storage.c: #define CREATE_MODE 0770 /* umask() should limit it more */ The code then uses CREATE_MODE as an argument to mkdir_parents(), but mkdir_parents()