similar to: Potential Patch

For various reasons, it makes our life easier at USC to have a 'install-nosysconf' target much like the install-nokeys target that was added a while back. I mentioned this a few months back on this list and people seemed to think it wouldn't be a problem to get it into the mainline tree. I've attached the patch -- it should keep 100% backwards compatibility. Thanks. -- Phil

Hey folks, About a year ago it was pointed out to me there was BSM support in CVS that would hopefully make it into a release soon. I had a look over it and it looks like it covers everything (it certainly covers more than the 3 or 4 things we do here at USC). So I'm wondering what the status of that is? Is it planned for a release soon? Are there issues with it? This is a really big feature

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |enhancement ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

This is a fairly inconsequential patch, but it comes in handy in a few instances. The patch simply splits install-files into "install-files" and "install-sysconf" - taking all of the sysconfdir stuff and putting in its own target which I then added to 'install' and 'install-nokeys'. I then added an install-nosysconf to NOT do that stuff. This helped us

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 ------- Additional Comments From phil at usc.edu 2005-02-25 13:09 ------- So we've done some internal testing with the latest snapshot over the last two days, and things look good. It's not a thorough test, but the logging is as we would expect, and everything else looks as expected. A huge thanks to all the people who helped with

FYI for those working with audit and intrusion detection on FreeBSD. Robert N M Watson ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:01:04 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: current@FreeBSD.org Cc: trustedbsd-audit@TrustedBSD.org Subject: Heads up: OpenBSM 1.0a6, per-auditpipe preselection imported to CVS This is a heads up to current@ users

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 alex.bell at bt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex.bell at bt.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

After reading some more from the archives, a private email, and some general research, I see that KerbV support has been dropped in favor of GSSAPI. Which is fine, and wonderful, I support GSSAPI. But, erm, the announcement says, "This release contains some GSSAPI user authentication support to replace legacy KerberosV authentication support. At present this code is still considered

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:10:45PM +1000, openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org wrote: > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:56:19 +1000 > From: Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> > Subject: Re: OpenSSH sget/sput suggestion > To: CRX Driver <crxssi at hotmail.com> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Message-ID: <430590A3.1090506 at zip.com.au> > Content-Type:

Can someone help me get BSM working with Solaris 8 and OpenSSH 3.5p1? I saw the patch here for OpenSSH 3.4p1, but do not know how to apply it to OpenSSH 3.4p1 nor do I feel comfortable modifying to work with OpenSSH 3.5p1: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Is this patch needed to fix the BSM crontab issue only, or is it required for BSM auditing in general? Jeff

One possibility is that Lame is using the wrong endianess for your system try changing NUMBER_LITTLE_ENDIAN to NUMBER_BIG_ENDIAN in liveice.h and rebuilding. The default distribution of Lame uses big endia samples on IO, which means that in raw input mode it needs the -x arg to be set. However - some 'helpful' people have made this the default on some distributions.... so when liveice

Hi Damien, I'm working with the Solaris team that is integrating openssh into upcoming Solaris releases. I'm looking for advice from the upstream community. You were suggested for that advice. If there are other mailing lists you'd like me to ask, I'm happy to do so, or if you'd like to forward, please feel free to do so. The --with-audit=bsm (audit-bsm.c) configuration

Is something special required for KerbV auth to work? I've enabled: KerberosAuthentication yes on some test boxes and it doesn't work. I do a kinit, and then ssh and it asks for a password. If you don't provide one, you don't get in.

Folks, I seem to have a problem when I upgraded our kerberos from 1.3.1 to 1.4.1 (MIT krb 5), all of a sudden I can't ssh as another user. i.e. ssh host works but ssh joe at host doesn't work. Same with scp's. I've tried recompiling ssh (even though the so-name of kerb libs didn't change), but it didn't work, and still no go... I'm using openssh 3.9p1 on Solaris

To get BSM working on Solaris 8 with OpenSSH, I did this: Download John R. Jackson's OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch here, and save as "patch.tar.gz": http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 (NOTE TO OpenSSH DEVELOPERS, can you incorporate this patch into the next version of OpenSSH?) Installing the OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch: ?-------------------------------------- Turning on Sun BSM

Hello, I just ran the predict.StructTS function using the AirPassengers data and got a ridiculous result. Here's what I ended up with: http://24.210.155.111/PredictWhat!.pdf Who wrote this? Am I seriously supposed to think this function would accurately predict a time series? -AnalogKid

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #647 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-12-20 16:24 -------

All, I've recently received a requirement to implement OpenSSH on a Solaris server with BSM enabled. Checking through the list archive suggests that the patch Darren's patch is almost ready but requires testing & perhaps fine-tuning. Can someone please let me know what the status is and if any assistance is required with testing I'm happy to offer an extra pair of hands. Thanks

#include <errno.h> was removed from includes.h in July: ---------------------------- revision 1.113 date: 2006/07/12 12:22:46; author: dtucker; state: Exp; lines: +1 -2 - stevesk at cvs.openbsd.org 2006/07/11 20:07:25 [scp.c auth.c monitor.c serverloop.c sftp-server.c sshpty.c readpass.c sshd.c monitor_wrap.c monitor_fdpass.c ssh-agent.c ttymodes.c atomicio.c includes.h

Is there any way to clear what''s in there? This happens any time flash[] is in my code. It can be setting or reading a value. I''ve tried commenting out all uses of flash in my code to get a few different pages to load, thinking this would clear the values, but no luck. If I get into the debugger, a p flash or pp flash will give a ''Stack level too deep'' error