similar to: WSEAS NEWSLETTER in MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Apologies if you are receiving this mail more than once... Please disseminate by colleagues, researchers, students, etc. Thanks a lot! ********************************************************************************** WorldCIST'13 The 2013 World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies March 27 - 30, Algarve, Portugal

Apologies if you are receiving this mail more than once... Please disseminate by colleagues, researchers, students, etc. Thanks a lot! ********************************************************************************** WorldCIST'13 The 2013 World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies March 27 - 30, Algarve, Portugal

Apologies if you are receiving this mail more than once... Please disseminate by colleagues, researchers, students, etc. Thanks a lot! ********************************************************************************** WorldCIST'13 The 2013 World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies March 27 - 30, Algarve, Portugal

Apologies if you are receiving this mail more than once... Please disseminate by colleagues, researchers, students, etc. Thanks a lot! ********************************************************************************** WorldCIST'13 The 2013 World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies March 27 - 30, Algarve, Portugal

Apologies if you are receiving this mail more than once... Please disseminate by colleagues, researchers, students, etc. Thanks a lot! ********************************************************************************** WorldCIST'13 The 2013 World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies March 27 - 30, Algarve, Portugal

Apologies if you are receiving this mail more than once... Please disseminate by colleagues, researchers, students, etc. Thanks a lot! ********************************************************************************** WorldCIST'13 The 2013 World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies March 27 - 30, Algarve, Portugal

Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi;

Am Freitag, 24. November 2006 03:00 schrieb Reid Spencer: > If you're making your own front end, you probably won't need it :) Well, I wanted to play around with it, so see, how my older programs perform with it. So far I managed to get some programs running by folowing scheme: for src in $infiles; do llvm-gcc -o $src.bc -c $src ; opt -f -o $src.bc.opt $src.bc ; llc -f $src.bc.opt

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings folks. > > I had really wanted out-of-tree folks to be able to make only a single > change to their code due to the new pass manager; essentially, by the time > they had to touch the code at all I wanted them to be able to port > completely to the new pass manager. > >

Hi useRs, In trying to take R to engineering undergraduate students, I have been looking for context that would make R more accessible to the said audience. Though R is primarily a statistical tool, I would want to demonstrate the use of R for certain engineering courses (Design of Machine Elements - gear design, ball bearings, etc.) which would generate interest in it and provide students a way

Greetings folks. I had really wanted out-of-tree folks to be able to make only a single change to their code due to the new pass manager; essentially, by the time they had to touch the code at all I wanted them to be able to port completely to the new pass manager. However, Richard has raised the issue that this is nearly impossible to make work with C++ modules, and we've lost the modules

On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Thank you Chris, > for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions > > asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, > asm_arguments, false); > > Alternatively > > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, >

Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?

Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:47 +0100, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote: > A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup, > that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html> > frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I > immediately got captured by its design when I've read the > documentation. I was always

A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup, that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html> frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I immediately got captured by its design when I've read the documentation. I was always scared by GCC - a great piece of software, but horribly bad documented, and in it's own way not very