Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "BD, the lions muzzles"
2003 Aug 12
0
excellently
Wow. dada spam.
Antranig Alfaro wrote:
> humans bouts scrupulously taxied annette methacrylate exert crouching
> exclude hubris meteorite aides acronym exogenous boater plead savoring
> tapestries courtrooms taunter bodyweight poultry pokes brandishes
> poems ama mightiness assam countless actinolite merges crave technic
> accomplishers bombast creation bonaparte
2014 Jul 14
1
Cemtos 6 - rc.local does not run
Is there a special step for this?
--
Cosme Corr?a
On Jul 8, 2014 4:32 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 11:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> >> On 7/8/2014 10:36 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> >> > 75 baud on a TTY (clank, clank, clank, ding, thud as the printer head
> >> > returned to the
2014 Feb 26
3
error en ifelse
Hola gente!! Estoy empezando a trabajar con R, y no puedo resolver lo
siguiente:
Quiero crear una nueva variable (datmatriz) que toma el valor de 1 si:
-la variable sp es igual a L.lucidum
-alguna de las variables pap11, pap06, pap01, pap96 es igual a muerto.
El script que utilicé es :
guaran$datmatriz<-ifelse (guaran$sp=="L.lucidum"|guaran$pap11 ==
2012 Mar 21
3
"cannot change working directory"
Hi,
I need to write program to run some results from an experiment. i have the
results saved in 2 different files, named "tuesday" and "wednesday" (both
located within the same file). when i wrote the program for "tuesday" i had
no problem running it, but when i changed the work directory to wednesday i
got the "cannot change working directory" message. I
2006 Jun 26
1
NLS and fitting of x-values?
I collected eggs laid by Springtails everyday over 28 days after swich to isotopically enriched diet. The eggs were pooled at day 7, 14, and 28 (+ day 0 = initial value) and analyzed for isotopes. After the diet switch the isotopic values of the adults and eggs change towards those of the new diet.
Here are the d13C values (y) of the eggs:
x y
0 -22.2
0 -22.2
0 -22.2
0 -22.0
7
2008 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] Helping the optimizer along (__assume)
Kenneth Boyd a écrit :
> Cédric Venet wrote:
>> you never seen assert(0 && "Not yet implemented"); ?
>> You may want to compile a program like this :)
>>
> As I see it, under the proposed extension a compile-time false constant
> would error "if the code commits to executing it".
>
> Heuristically, something like
>
> void