similar to: blog on TDD from acceptance/functional testing

Hey all, While I object to the name "testing", Uncle Bob''s recent blog on Acceptance Testing/Unit Testing might prove interesting for those of you grappling with the meaning of Story Runner (which fits in the Acceptance Testing space) vs Spec Runner (which fits in the Unit Testing space). http://blog.objectmentor.com/articles/2007/10/17/tdd-with-acceptance-tests-and-unit-tests

I can see that Asterisk supports TDD text channels, as there is a tdd.c file in the source, this appears to be exposed via TDD MODE in the AGI interface? I cant find any documentation anywhere on how to use this. Has anyone done this? tdd.c seems to only support 45.5 baud calls. Ideally I'd like a simple TDD answering machine, that sends "PLEASE TYPE MESSAGE" and receives TDD

I didn't know if it would work or not, but I figured I'd try slow-speed half-duplex TDD over GSM & Vonage. I called a AGI script I have that speaks to TTYs, by calling from Vonage to one of my Voicepulse lines. I don't control the Vonage codec, so I have no idea what it uses, but I am using GSM for the Voicepulse line. Everything worked fine - echo canceling didn't cause any

[snip good stuff] > After that you realize that TDD just makes you happy, so you start to apply it to other aspects of your life. Wait, I thought happiness had something to do with goats and feeling guilty about it. I''m confused. Again. But I would second Dylan''s suggestion of seeing a video of TDD in action w/ RoR. Having never tried this, it''s difficult to

I've read the WIKI. Any additional information on the TDD mode? Anyone done a TDD to email app? James Taylor MetroTel 3505 Summerhill Road Suite 11 Texarkana, Tx 75503 903-793-1956

We are working on a TDD application and testing with an Ultratec SuperPrint 4425 in Australia. We've got it to exchange characters fairly cleanly for a minute or two but after that we seem to be getting a signal but no character in Asterisk. Has anybody done any work with the Asterisk TDD functionality and got it to work reliably? Does anyone have any idea what might be causing the

On voip-info I found a few dated references to TDD support being in the alpha stage and buggy. Can anyone direct me to any newer information on this option? Thanks -- Karl Harris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100616/d18f876f/attachment.htm

Hi, I''m learning TDD without using Shoulda or RSpec. When I played with RSpec, there was a tool to show test coverage visually. Is there any similar function built-in to Rails Test::Unit? Or do I need to add it on my own? What''s the recommended tool? I tried `rake -T test`, but didn''t find anything about coverage. -Jon

Mosquito, the TDD framework for Camping has been updated (0.1.3). We''ve tried to keep it backwards compatible, so your apps should continue to work. But feel free to submit a bug report at RubyForge if you have any problems. Changes: http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?group_id=351&release_id=14845 Download: http://rubyforge.org/projects/mosquito/ Docs:

I'm working on a setup for a company that needs to be able to handle TDD/TTY calls for the hearing impaired. Is there anything special that I need to consider for this? We're looking at an Asterisk solution for them, the tones need to be stored in the IVR as well as coming across extensions. Any thoughts? Hatton

TDD, SVN and migrations seem to be a natural combination for model development: create a test, add the column with a migration, write the code, and check it all in when you''re done. The trouble is that this ends up creating one migration per field. I guess it''s not horrible in and of itself, but it does have a code smell to it. Has anyone come up with a different way of doing

It seems like half the people on this list are writing a book on Ruby or Rails. For all the hints I''ve seen strewn across the list I have yet to see one that will focus on test-driven development for either Ruby or for Rails. If anyone is looking for a topic, please consider this. I''ve been trying to wrap my brain around the TDD process, but its way of thinking is

esteeming Coiled tubing units are so compact and have such great potential, the Mars Drilling Project is evaluating a coiled tubing unit to drill for water on Mars. fells disseverance SPRING, TX--(MARKET WIRE)-- Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. (CTBG) announces the delivery of the first group of 8 Rotating Tools to oil and gas well service companies operating in Mexico and Oklahoma. Designed for use

Hi all, How can I use spec fixtures with rails integration tests ? I''ve tried adding {{ fixtures "../../spec/fixtures/myfixture" }} to the integration test but the fixtures are not loaded when I run the rake task. Rails doesn''t load symlinked fixtures either so I copied the files from spec/fixtures for the time being. Not very DRY. Any ideas ? Keith

Just a thought, it would be interesting to track and graph the number of examples (and number implemented) on a daily basis as a way of tracking a project progress.

The problem I''m having is that I can''t seem to destroy the cookies and assert that they were indeed destroyed inside the test. The code to do this does work - the cookies are created, and are destroyed when this is done in a browser, but I can''t seem to make the test pass. account_signup_test.rb def test_should_pass_if_logout_destroys_cookie_data post :login,

In a method named logo in my application helper, I reference an application controller method (current_account) that has been marked as a helper method with the following syntax: helper_method :current_account When I test out the setup in the browser (without rspec), rails is happy with this setup. However, when I run the spec, the spec won''t pass and gives me the following error:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''ve been working my way through the Agile book and just completed the depot sample application. I learned quite a bit along the way. On page 171 we are led through the creation of a test (that fails) for new code. The new code (a search function) is left as an exercise for the reader. Well, I think I solved it but I''m not

Sorry this may well be defined as Off Topic. I apologize in advance. I am interested in performing what I think would be a probabilistic sensitivity simulation. I've done some crude ones before in excel but I'm wondering if R can help me do it more effectively? I have a set of theoretical variables for simplicity lets use (what I think) is an easier example: I have a peg and a hole

Hi, I wonder what kind of interest there is on Test Driven Development (TDD) in R. Test Driven Development consists of writing the test before the function, and iteratively build the function until it passes the test. Python and Ruby (specially Ruby) have very strong test-oriented cultures. In fact, in Ruby at least the custom is to do TDD and lately Behavior-driven development (BDD). In BDD,