similar to: SCSI cards

I have a Centos server and I want to only accept mail for the local users from 3 mail servers, but I still want the users to be able to send emails through this server, If I firewall the SMTP port to my 3 mail servers is there any way users will be able to still send via the main POP server ? (currently using Sendmails SMTP-Auth) Thanks Denis

Hi all,? I have a CentOS 4.5 server running on a workstation mainboard (PCI Slots only).? We have now one 200 Gigs IDE disk dedicated for e-mail server storage.? We use Communigate Pro and the server has 45 Outlook clients with the MAPI connector (All mailboxes on the server).? When a user opens Outlook, a refresh of the local cache is performed for his data.? There is a big "Public"

hi, does someone tried bridge and or router functionality of linux kernel on multiprocessor system. Does multiprocessor system increase network performance or give ability to process higher traffic.. What about highest possible troughput someone have achieved ? etc.. tia _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

If any of you have been so bold as to install the Shorewall CA Certificate in your browser(s), the current certificate will expire on 11/13. There is a new 10-year certificate available for installation at: http://lists.shorewall.net/Shorewall_CA_html.html -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

I want to build 2 servers (both running samba) to provide file storage to 2 offices (approx 100 miles apart, linked via DSL) but all data writen to 1 server must also be saved to the other server. Both servers would also allow users to access the data via a VPN thus allowing 1 office with a failed server to access the other server via the vpn and still see the data from both offices. I currently

I have 1 Centos server V4.x already running VSFTPD and when the user logs in they get chrooted to the home directory, I have installed the same config files to a second server (again Centos V4.x) and have setup the same user on the second server but the user does not get chrooted to the home directory but is placed in /var/ftp/pub and cannot upload file. The files I copied are:-

I have 2 Centos servers that are currently giving me grief, I am getting the error:- SYSERR(root): timeout writing message to mail.server.co.uk Resource temporarily unavailable This is on both servers 1 is Centos 4.x & the second is:- sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 sendmail-cf-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 sendmail-devel-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 Any clues ? Thanks Denis No virus found in this outgoing

As read here : http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jns/security/iptables/iptables_conntrack.html modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp would give me the ability to use active ftp if I have (pseudo/simplified code) iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -j DROP but I cant use active ftp, WHAT IS WRONG.. eth0 is the internal interface..

Hi Fernando, Thanks for the very clear explanation. Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > simulation: it does not add instructions to LLVM IR. Instead, it builds an > interval representation for each variable. Each interval represents a > variable in SSI form, and will be associated to one or more constraints, > like v > 10, or v > a.length. A query will have to find the

Dear LLVM Community, I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My project is attached as a pdf file. Regards, -- Andre Tavares Master Student in Computer Science - UFMG - Brasil http://dcc.ufmg.br/~andrelct

Hi, I have config like this ,... but all traffic goes to the default class 1:4, WHY ? What I'' doing wrong... filters are attached to the root ! tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 4 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:4 htb rate 55kbit ceil 55kbit prio 7 <--default class tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 20Mbit tc qdisc add dev

Dear All, Perhaps a related issue is whether SSI form is valuable for other transformations or analysis passes. If it is, then it might be worth building general SSA->SSI and SSI->SSA transforms so that any LLVM pass wishing to have the code in SSI form can do so. -- John T. Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > [snip] > > OK. Is it possible to do SSI Transformation --> Array Bounds

2009/3/27 Andre Tavares <andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> > I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in > taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, > but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My > project is attached as a pdf file. By changing LLVM IR from SSA to SSI, you propose to

hi, anyone to know a tool that will display more friendly output ... probably a tree like structure (if no cross sections occur)... OR a top like output... thanx raptor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi to all, sorry in advance for my poor english, this is the first time that i wrote to a list if i make mistake .... excuseme. My problem is this: i have dovecot 2.1.8 installed and functioning from 2 years one week ago i have installed crm114 for my last spam detection filter "version 20100106-BlameMichelson (TRE 0.8.0 (BSD))" My mail system is qmail that through .qmail default

On May 19, 2009, at 8:15 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Nicolas Geoffray >> <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr> wrote: >>>> The pi functions can be implemented with copy instructions. >>> Store instructions? >> >> I would assume something more like "select i1 true, <ty> %val, <ty>

2009/3/29 Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com>: > 2009/3/27 Andre Tavares <andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> >> >> I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in >> taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, >> but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My >> project

There is some redundancy at the instruction format level in the x86 .td files. For example, in X86InstrFormats.td: // SSE1 Instruction Templates: // // SSI - SSE1 instructions with XS prefix. class SSI<bits<8> o, Format F, dag outs, dag ins, string asm, list<dag> pattern> : I<o, F, outs, ins, asm, pattern>, XS, Requires<[HasSSE1]>; // SSE3 Instruction

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> I should have asked a better question. By "does it work" I meant something >> like >> >> for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) >> System.out.println(a[i]); >> >> > > OK, so no :) VMKit does not know that a[i] is related to a.length. I > believe Andre's

Dear LLVM Community, I am one of the summer of coders working on LLVM this year. My project is to implement the ABCD algorithm for array bounds checking, and also a bitwidth analysis that maps variables to an approximation of its size in bits. To implement this, I will have to simulate a intermediate representation called SSI (Static Single Information) form on top of LLVM SSA