similar to: bsd-cray.c r.1.12: multiple syntax errors

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a >

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a > > share. The situation is like this: > > > > Given a share "test" which exports "/test" to a NIS netgroup

Hi, I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a share. The situation is like this: Given a share "test" which exports "/test" to a NIS netgroup "foo", I want to limit access to the directory "/test/restricted" to a specific filegroup "bar". All members of the filegroup "bar" are also members of the netgroup

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:57 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 09:41, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > >> On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen

Hi! I have a server with a few thousand mailboxes (for a few hundred domains) on it. The usernames are following several naming conventions: username_domain domain_username username_domain.tld username-domain domain.username The reason for this chaos is that the accounts were set up on different mailservers, some imail, some linux, some with virtualmin and some manually and

Hello   I have a fileserver running samba 4.9.4 that is a member in an AD. The backup tool I am using is running as a linux user that is a member of linux group 'disk'. I'd like to add the group disk to a windows AD group 'backup' which have read access to the share. I am thinking that it is easier to manage the share from one point and that being the windows tool. I have only

Hi, I have built R 2.1.1 on Solaris and OSF1, and used the operating system's native compiler set. This worked fine. However, when I try using install.packages() it insists on using g77 etc., which doesn't exist on those systems. How can I specify which compilers to use? What about other compile-time options like LDFLAGS etc.? NB! Please include me in the CC list, since I'm not a

First of all, please direct me into how better to search existing threads in this mailing list. Ok to my rspec 2.0.1 mocha 0.9.8 issue: given a controller test before do subject.expects(:authenticate).once end it "should bla bla" do pending "PENDING, shouldn''t fail?" end with config.mock_with :rspec it''s ok: pending, but with

>> [...] I'd like to add the group disk to a >> windows AD group 'backup' [...] > A 'local' Linux is just that, a local user, it is not a part of AD, so > it cannot be used in AD, the same goes for groups. > > You could create the user in AD and then make this user a Linux user as > well, but you will have to delete the local Linux user. > >

I inherited an old Samba 4 server that act as both AD DC and fileserver. Hardware is old, need to be replaced. Plan is to add a second AD DC and join a new fileserver as a domain member, rsync all files from the old file server to the new and map clients to the new one and finally demote the old AD DC. The old AD DC has this line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes Because of that my

Hi So I added a second DC with the rfc2307 option. It replicates and I auth works. yay. >> Does this also mean that the member server that will act as a file >> server should have idmap config = ad? > Only if you have manually added uidNumber & gidNumber attributes to AD I belive the microsoft admin tools have always been used to add users and groups Is 'idmap

> > > > Is 'idmap rid' a better choice than ad? Can I still copy files with > > rsync in that case or will file ownership be mangled? > > Quantify better ? > One isn't really better than the other, they are both usable, but in > different ways and reasons. > It might help if you read this: > >

Gid 4294967295 = Nobody (32-bit) Thats your problem. A problem in the nss mappings. https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-January/205672.html Is the a simular thread to your problem, ready it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ian > Coetzee via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 10 april 2019 15:37

Hi Roland On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 12:00, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:41:52 +0200 > Ian Coetzee <samba at iancoetzee.za.net> wrote: > > > Ho Roland, > > > > Replies inline > > > > > > > > > The only user I have is the jeadmin user which is the domain > > > > admin as well as a

Hai Ian, Can you run this one again on both servers and pm me both outputs. I'll have a good look. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh I've updated the file, so do use the new one. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ian > Coetzee via samba >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-12 19:43 ------- Is there anything else left to be done here or can the bug be closed? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Please apply directly using the forms or URL below, or contact Luiz if you > have questions. --Vikram Are these posting llvm related? If not, they are not appropriate for llvmdev. -Chris > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Luiz DeRose" <ldr at cray.com> >> Date: December 5, 2006 5:26:01 PM CST >>

Hello, just for curiosity. Would you hire foreign developer (currently not in US) ?> Hi all,>>Wanted to let you know about some compiler work opportunities here at Cray.>We're pushing LLVM in all sorts of interesting ways and there's lots of work>inside and outside of LLVM to keep us all busy.>>Please let me know if you are interested.

Everyone, > Hello, just for curiosity. Would you hire foreign developer (currently > not in US) ? Please, send e-mail directly to Cray folks, such questions are definitely OT in this mailing list. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

On Wednesday 08 July 2009 16:58, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Hi, David, > > Is the LLVM-based back end you have been working on for the Cascade > system used by this or any other Cray installations? Is the XT5 > related to Cascade in any way? Thanks, Yes, the LLVM backend is used in the Cray compiler on the XT5. Thus LLVM is compiling code that runs on over 180,000 cores. Pretty