similar to: ANNOUNCE: GSSLib support for OpenSSH (patch)

I?m working on an implementation of ?gssapi-with-mic? authentication for my AsyncSSH package and trying to get it to interoperate with OpenSSH. I?ve gotten it working, but there seems to be a discrepancy between the OpenSSH implementation and RFC 4462. Specifically, RFC 4462 says the following in section 3.4: Since the user authentication process by its nature authenticates only the client,

On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Douglas E Engert <deengert at gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/16/2017 2:09 PM, Ron Frederick wrote: >> I?m working on an implementation of ?gssapi-with-mic? authentication for my AsyncSSH package and trying to get it to interoperate with OpenSSH. I?ve gotten it working, but there seems to be a discrepancy between the OpenSSH implementation and RFC 4462.

(I hope this message is appropriate for these lists. If not, please tell me and I won't do it again.) Hi All. There will be a new release of OpenSSH in a couple of weeks. This release contains Kerberos and GSSAPI related changes that we would like to get some feedback about (and hopefully address any issues with) before the release. I encourage anyone with an interest in

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.21 release series. Changes since 4.21.1 -------------------- o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15732: smbd fails to correctly check sharemode against OVERWRITE ???? dispositions. ?? * BUG 15754: Panic in close_directory. o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipensky at samba.org> ?? *

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.21 release series. Changes since 4.21.1 -------------------- o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15732: smbd fails to correctly check sharemode against OVERWRITE ???? dispositions. ?? * BUG 15754: Panic in close_directory. o? Pavel Filipensk? <pfilipensky at samba.org> ?? *

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.5 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15590: libldb: performance issue with indexes (ldb 2.9.2 is already ???? released). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15624: DH reconnect error

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.5 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15590: libldb: performance issue with indexes (ldb 2.9.2 is already ???? released). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15624: DH reconnect error

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1654 Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at josefsson.org --- Comment #3 from Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org> --- Another idea is

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357 Summary: SSH does not handle "Protocol" option in ~/.ssh/options properly Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Hi! I’m running glmer (lme4) models with biodiversity data and I’m having trouble with understanding/finding information on how the offset() option is implemented. Explicitly, I’m wondering if the offset is only implemented on the dependent variable (as I think it is), or does it also affect independent variables in the model (was told this by a stat guy at our department)? My data is

--3Y2Mr1SP1gWKl0+e Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="j9XQ5cF5hebrmXqw" Content-Disposition: inline --j9XQ5cF5hebrmXqw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.10 1.2.10 is (like most other 1.2.x releases) a maintainance release,

Hi, the IETF drafts had to be removed from the Debian package recently because IETF RFCs/drafts are (per default) not conformant to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, see <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390665>. It would be nice if Phil and Luca could dual-license the drafts under a DFSG-free license also ... most straight-forward would be libtheora's own

I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the release branches instead. On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi > > What do you think about publishing PGP signed tarballs without the > generated files such as the ./configure script? > > What I'm looking for is for some private key holder of the OpenSSH > portable release key to run

--5uhzMJlTksuFv+PE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9A1A73/U17WN0PFw" Content-Disposition: inline --9A1A73/U17WN0PFw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.9 1.2.9 is (like most other 1.2.x releases) a maintainance release,

--va9XEZk9/dJ5GUjX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vM12nk/63StVgfqY" Content-Disposition: inline --vM12nk/63StVgfqY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.9rc1 Version 1.2.9rc1 is the first release candidate of the upcoming 1.2.9

Hi I have pushed a (quite preliminary) branch that adds SPHINCS+ SSH signature support for OpenSSH: https://github.com/jas4711/openssh-portable/tree/sphincsp I've written a bit about it here: https://blog.josefsson.org/2024/12/23/openssh-and-git-on-a-post-quantum-sphincs/ What do you think? My primary use-case is for ssh-keygen -Y sign/verify usage to protect Git commits. It isn't

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357 ------- Additional Comments From dfs at roaringpenguin.com 2002-07-18 00:56 ------- Sorry; my illustrated output for the second case was wrong. It should look like this: $ ssh -v -2 shevy OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090603f debug1: Reading configuration data /home/dfs/.ssh/config debug1: Applying options for * debug1:

On Apr 18 08:50, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> writes: > > > I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the > > release branches instead. > > Ok that may also achieve the same goal of reproducible release tarballs > built from source code. > > With that approach, the tarball depends on which autoconf

On 2024/04/18 10:06, Damien Miller wrote: > I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the > release branches instead. That seems a sane approach. > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > and then publish the resulting openssh-9.7p1-src.tar.gz and > > openssh-9.7p1-src.tar.gz.asc files, preferably using a version of git > > that

this is the proposed gssapi diff against OpenSSH-current (non-portable). note: if this goes in, the old krb5 auth (ssh.com compatible) will be removed. please comment. jakob Index: auth.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/hack/jakob/mycvs/sshgss/auth.h,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.1.1.2 -r1.3 --- auth.h