similar to: openssh ldap public key patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1700 matches similar to: "openssh ldap public key patch"

2003 Feb 02
0
[PATCH] LDAP public key patch.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, The following patch provide LDAP public key authentication instead of only ~/.ssh/authorized_keys. Allow you to centralize/control easily users authentication on a server farm. Patch: http://ldappubkey.gcu-squad.org/ldappubkey-ossh3.5-2.patch more informations on http://ldappubkey.gcu-squad.org/ Best Regards, - -- Eric. -----BEGIN PGP
2003 Mar 27
0
[PATCH] authentication with x509 certificate
Hi, I have made new small patch. He use X509 certificate to authenticate users. This patch use some features which are coded by Eric Auge (see ldap patch http://ldappubkey.gcu-squad.org/). You could find the patch on http://traceroute.free.fr/articles.php?id=24 regards, Fred.
2007 Jan 02
4
Geek Squad UPS Systems
We are interested in using Nut on our Federa 6.0 servers. However, our UPS systems are sold under the name "Geek Squad" (sold through the Best Buy chain of department stores). I'm pretty certain Geek Squad does not manufacture these units and they just rebrand them. Does anyone know who makes these units or what they are compatible with in terms of driver level protocol? The ones we
2007 Sep 16
0
Port forwarding from dom0 to bridged domU with IPVS
Hi list, We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of : . a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386 This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will only have one public IP. Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables / netfilter. We didn''t really
2010 Nov 23
1
is it possible to prevent many loggings on many computer from only one user?
Hi everyone I would like to know if it's possible to prevent many loggings on many computers from only one user? I have user who opened 12 computers, logged on those 12 computers and ran boinc-client on those 12 computers... I want to prevent this kind of behaviour... Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Olivier Pavilla << ????????????????>> S.C.I.R.C. Orl?ans (Bourgogne) - I.U.F.M.
2007 Jan 19
5
Install problem & Geek Squad UPS
I Seem to have made some progress in getting nut-2.0.5 installed, but hidups still has a version number of 0.13. First is hidups 0.13 the correct version? if not how do I find the correct version. Second if my Geek Squad GS1285U UPS is not supported how do I proceed. I have been a programmer for 35 years(mostly high level computer aided design), written code in 20 some languages, am retired
2007 Oct 05
2
Working UPS report: Geek Squad GS-700U (Cyberpower clone?)
Hi, I wanted to report some success with monitoring this UPS, a "Geek Squad" brand GS-700U that I purchased earlier this year from Best Buy Canada. Information about this... thing is very scarce so here is what I know: The unit itself is probably made by Cyberpower. It has a 9-pin serial port on the UPS, as well as a serial-USB adapter thing. I cracked open the serial-USB
2006 Aug 15
2
CPS GS 1500U
Hello all, Has anyone had any luck getting a CPS GS 1500U working with NUT via USB. Its branded Geek Squad (don't ask) but it shows up in the USB device list as the CPS 1500U. I'm running Kubuntu Dapper with all current updates installed, Kernel 2.6.15-26-686, NUT 2.0.3. I've tried hidups and newhidups. With hidups I used port=/dev/bus/usb/001/004 which I'm sure is the UPS
2007 Jan 19
1
Install question
I downloaded nut-2.0.5 and followed the install instructions down to step 6. Since I will be using a USB port to connect to the Geek Squad GS 1285U did not go any farther yet. I tried to run "/lib/nut/hidups -DD -u root auto" to see if it found my UPS. But it is still the old hidups 0.13 from nut-2.0.3. Do I need to do something additional to get the new hidups?
2017 Sep 26
1
Winbind group membership not updating
On 26/09/17 11:53, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > I don't think you can work around this, I am fairly sure if you try > this against a windows server, you would get the same result, unless > the user logs out, they will still think they are members of the group > and will get access. > > Rowland > ...huh. Yes, of course. I was fixated on the *NIX side and didn't
1999 Oct 28
1
dos filetime resolution and dvf
I am not getting much benefit from using oplocks = False or dos filetime resolution = True in Samba 1.9.18p3 on Solaris 2.5.1 and the Developer Studio in Digital Visual Fortran (v6.0) on WinNT4,SP4. I am also setting my PC clock to the samba server. I still get a lot of messages from the Studio informing me the source code files and workspaces have changed outside the editor or Studio
2001 Aug 23
1
ext3 + autofs4 yields kernel oops
I recently applied the ext3-2.4-0.9.6-249.gz patch to an otherwise unmodified official-from-Linus 2.4.9 kernel. I built both ext2 and ext3 in as modules, did the "tune2fs -j" incantation, and rebooted. Mounting / as ext3 worked fine. But a few seconds later, my startup scripts tried to launch a squad of automounter daemons, and that didn't work so well. A stream of kernel
2003 Sep 20
4
how many production systems are there?
i am just curious how many * systems are in the real world with more than one user. do you run a certain version? you dont update CVS do you? any admins running a system of over twenty? over fifty? over one-hundred? i deal with 3com and nec systems all day (i am cerified in the 3com nbx advanced network telephony, elite voice mail, CCNA, A+, nec ipk, and soon to be "asterisk school of
2010 Mar 24
0
form_for with nested shallow route
Let''s say I have: map.resources :teams do |team| team.resources :squads, :shallow => true end When I want to generate a form_for a squad, I need both the team and squad for new/create, but only the squad for edit. This means I need: edit: form_for(squad) new: form_for([team, squad]) This seems not very dry. Is there a more idiomatic way of doing this? Right now,
2019 May 15
3
Delinearization validity checks in DependenceAnalysis
Hi David, Thank you very much for your response. I also get correct results for my example (for a 64-bit target) if the upper bounds are changed to unsigned. The reason is simply because clang zero-extends `m` for address calculations but sign-extends it for the loop upper bound. This prevents SCEV from canceling out the 'm' term from the difference expression that looks like `(-3 +
2002 Apr 17
0
A-SQUAD Security
This is a message to my fellow network security professionals, www.asquad.com is formed by a group of security professionals with experience and knowledge. Even so, we would like your participation in the exchanging of ideas and your contribution of knowledge. We would appreciate your input about our web site and our Forum. We invite you to check out our site and register to become part of
2023 Apr 14
0
Geek Annual based service G-SQUAD/APR14/10240051
Geek Receipt ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ** *~**GEEK-SQUAD~* Hi Geek-Squad User, We hope you're enjoying our services! We are glad to inform you that your annual plan with us has been successfully renewed. Your Geek Secure service plan
2007 Jan 26
1
newhidups output for Geek Squad GS1285U
This took a long time because I had problems with my system. After I reloaded my operating system several times I found I had a bad memory module. Here is the output from newhidups for my Geek Squad GS1285U. It just kept repeating until I hit ctl-z. I think that this means nut will work for this ups. My computer is not powered by the ups yet. I did not want it to be powered down by accident.
2019 May 13
3
Delinearization validity checks in DependenceAnalysis
Hi all, I have been looking at the `DependenceAnalysis` pass in `llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.h`. In order for this analysis to produce accurate dependence vectors for multi-dimensional arrays in nested loops, it needs to "delinearize" array element accesses to recover the subscripts in each dimension of the array. I believe that the current implementation of
2019 May 16
2
Delinearization validity checks in DependenceAnalysis
Hello Under the proviso that it's been a while since I looked into any of these things... On 05/15, Bardia Mahjour via llvm-dev wrote: > I also get correct results for my example (for a 64-bit target) if the upper > bounds are changed to unsigned. The reason is simply because clang zero-extends > `m` for address calculations but sign-extends it for the loop upper bound. This >