similar to: Combining Transparent Proxying with SSH Port Forwarding

For those who don't know, Greg Houlette sent in a request from an address that doesn't conveniently accept replies. If people can't be bothered to read our replies, we shouldn't be bothered by their requests. Just a note. Maybe a request for a killfile. --Dan

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Summary: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support on Linux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2526 Bug ID: 2526 Summary: Support for transparent proxying Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Does anybody know how to create a pie chart in Gruff without percentage but actual numbers? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To

Hi, Is it possible to transparent proxy FTP through Squid? If so what rules would i need to add to the rules file so that any ftp request is forwarding through Squid? I have www traffic being Tranparantly proxied. Herwith my www rules: REDIRECT loc 3128 tcp 80 ACCEPT loc fw::3128 tcp www - all ACCEPT fw

Hi, I'm considering patching Dovecot to work as a transparent (and virus scanning) IMAP proxy. What is the appropriate feature to extend? (I've considered the following: IMAPC and reverse proxying, with IMAPC looking more promising since it actually parses IMAP communication). Can anyone who is familiar with the IMAPC code recommend what are the most appropriate locations in the

Hello, I'm running Wine 0.9.10 on a Fedora Core 5 at work. I'd like to use the Socks5 proxy we've got with application run under Wine. The application I'm using in Wine works fine using direct connection to the internet but this application has no settings I can change to inform it of the socks proxy. So I'm using Sockscap32 2.38 from www.permeo.com . It works fine under

Hi all, I have a strange problem in trying to install a transparent proxy (in my internal net not on the shorewall server) according to the instructions as outlined in http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#Local My Network looks the following: Internal Net: 10.0.0.0/24 Squid Server listening on port 3128 (ip 10.0.0.152, DNS name server01) | |

I am using Apache2.2 + Mongrel on my machine. Now I am accessing it over LAN. When I enter http://mymachinename/myapp it opens fine but when I click on any link in my rails app, it replaces mymachinename with localhost (http://localhost/myapp/controller/action) and thus I am unable to access it from remote location.

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

Hi, I want forward port 21 and 443 to my squid. A simply rule (dnat) didnt help me. My http - port (only 80) will forwarded to my squid. It runs fine. Here I have used the HowTo from Tom and the hints from http://lartc.org/. I want to do the same with port 21 as port 80. My network: Shorewall: eth0 net (192.168.108.1) eth1 dmz (192.168.109.1) eth2 loc (192.168.110.1) eth3 loc1

Hi! I noticed that `ssh -D /tmp/socket $myhost` will actually provide a socks server listing on the unix domain socket /tmp/socket (this does not appear to be documented, though it is semi-documented for -L and -R). Do you know of any "socksification" script to go along with it, in the spirit of tsocks of socksify (from dante)? Those do not seem to support socks servers running on

Am Di, 20. Feb 2018, 23:13:16 -0800 schrieb Dan Kaminsky: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 > From: Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> > To: J? Fahlke <jorrit at jorrit.de> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Re: Is there socksify script for dynamics forwardings to unix > domain sockets? > > Whoa. That's pretty cool. > >

I have latest version of mongrel installed. But when I run ''ruby script/server'' it starts the server and shows nothing else, like development log it used to show on my previous dev machine. Any idea? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

1. I have a text area in which I type on multiple lines..but when I display it, it prints whole text in one line..how can I solve that? Datatype is TEXT 2. I can see a list of all posts at ..post/ with index method but I want to see a particular post with ..post/[id] .. how can I do that? 3. I want my application to be completely secured and whatever page unlogged in user tries to open, it

Salutations, I was recently using openssh 6.8p1-3 for socks tunelling with a public wifi hotspot. I attempted to watch youtube but was notified that it was not allowed in my area. The socks server I was connected to definitely had the ability to connect to youtube, so I concluded the issue was with the public wifi hotspot. How much does socks tunneling with openssh obscure? Command : ssh -ND

I have an array authors=[1,3,7] and I want to get all the posts that match with any or all of these results. something like... posts = Post.find(:all, [:conditions => ''''author_id = ?'', authors]) of course this wont work but I need something like it that works.. thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

Hi all, I''m trying to set up a transparent proxy with dansguardian, and running into some strange issues with the squid setup without dansguardian. I have used shorewall for quite some time, and I''m stumped as to why I can''t get this to work. Here is a brief synopsis of my network. loc --> gateway/firewall--> net I have the following policies: #firewall to

I'm excited to see that dovecot 1.0-test series supports transparent proxy, but that excitement is muted by: - the recommendation to avoid 1.0 at present; - the requirement to use SQL authentication. I guess I could ignore the first, but the second is sticky. How hard would it be to hack a different sort of proxy server cue into the authentication? Perhaps one of: If authenticating via

Dear All, Linux Kernel 2.4.20-8 Running Shorewall 2.2.0 ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:48:54:53:82:45 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 62.68.254.178/28 brd