similar to: [PATCH] Minor nit: -D is now "socks" not "socks4"

is openssh going to ever contain socks4/5 proxy support (http://www.socks.nec.com/) the same way ssh (nonfree version) does? Without this support, openssh is completely unusable behind a firewall. Hayden A. James

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So

FINALLY, it's here. You can now tell SSH which address to bind to for every single port forwarding option! This patch allows you to pass the following as ssh command line options: ssh -L 192.168.1.55:1234:localhost:80 -R ::11:22:aa:bb/80/localhost/80 etc. Or as normal config file options: LocalForward ::11:22:33/1234 localhost/80 RemoteForward 1.2.3.4:80 localhost:80 It will also

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS

My desire is to form a connection from my laptop running ubuntu to a SOCKS5 server listed on the Internet. I have read the Ubuntu man page on OpenSSH client program. The description indicates that I have to connect to given host name (assumed to be an ip address?) with optional username. I want the server receive my Internet traffic in SOCKS5 protocol and respond to my computer the requested

This provides SOCKS4A support, which allows a SOCKS4 client to provide a host name instead of an IP address. It indicates that it's doing so by using a known-invalid IP address 0.0.0.x (where x != 0), and then appending the NUL-terminated hostname to the connection request. Although we check for the terminating NUL manually and the 'fatal(len %d > have %d)' should never happen, the

Hello list, I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even with configured (socks5) proxy which fails behind restrictive firewalls. Is there any "workaround"? Thanks in advance! Regards Uwe -------------- n?chster Teil -------------- Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt... URL:

Hi there, I'm Vladimir Olteanu (or just Vlad, for short), and I'm working on the SOCKSv6 protocol. It is being discussed at the IETF (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6-10). The spec has matured somewhat and is currently undergoing an adoption call at the Intarea WG. I would like to get your opinion on this newer version of the protocol, in particular on how

I have a few patches for AIX. The patchfile is attached below. The patch has been tested on AIX4.2 and AIX4.3. The patch is on openssh-1.2.1pre25, with openssl-0.94, using RSAref. 1) authenticate support - this function allows the system to determine authentification. Whatever the system allows for login, authenticate will too. It doesn't matter whether it is AFS, DFS, SecureID, local.

Hi, Some programs, which requires network, do not support proxy mechanism such as SOCKS5. There is a tool called proxychains (http://proxychains.sf.net) which provides us to redirect all of the network traffic to a defined server can be SOCKS4, 5, or others. For instance, I can use proxychains wget http://www.google.com to download the homepage of google if I am behind the proxy. This is quiet

Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an

Here is a patch to implement a handy new feature proposed by John Hardin <johnh at aproposretail.com>. This is his description of the feature: New option for OpenSSH: Delay before exit. Command line option: -S delay Config file option: sleep {delay} Purpose: Wait the specified number of seconds after last traffic before dropping the connection and exiting. If ports are forwarded, this

Hello, Anyone know socks5 proxy in centOS? For linux I know "delegate" but can not locate rpm package. I am trying to make something like this: client->squid:3128->[socks proxy]:8118->[ssh socks5 proxy]:port- >sshd:22-> -- -- Publicidad http://www.pas-world.com

if I: ssh -fND localhost:6000 somebody at 192.168.56.5 -p PORTNUMBER from computer "A" to computer "B" [B = 192.168.56.5] then I can set the SOCKS proxy for e.g.: Firefox to use "localhost:6000" on computer "A". Ok. I can surf the web through "B". But: - Can anyone sniff the traffic of "A"? [e.g.: computers on same subnet as

Greetings, Here's a small patch to allow adding dynamic port forwards during a session using the ~C command line. Local and remote port forwards are already supported in a similar manner, but we thought this would be useful as well -- hope it finds its way to the official distribution. Best, Cody Raspen John Mishanski -------------- next part -------------- diff -aur

Hello, I'm running Wine 0.9.10 on a Fedora Core 5 at work. I'd like to use the Socks5 proxy we've got with application run under Wine. The application I'm using in Wine works fine using direct connection to the internet but this application has no settings I can change to inform it of the socks proxy. So I'm using Sockscap32 2.38 from www.permeo.com . It works fine under

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1572 Summary: accept SOCKS requests over the mux socket in master mode Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs

Hello Guus, thanks for Your fast reply. Does it mean only socks is affected and http proxy should work? If this is the case then this may be a temp. solution. Thanks and regards! Uwe Am 27.10.2015 14:08:36, schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:33:35PM +0000, Uwe Werler wrote: > > > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > > with