similar to: works in script but not in rake

hi, When running rails spec tests is there a log file generated? i''m looking for generated sql to help me debug like in development.log or is there a way to run the test against a webrick server so i can see logs? (i''m not running with spec_server at the moment, it doesnt seem to work well with autotest) thanks linoj

fyi, I just posted this http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/Running_rspec_after_you_deploy - linoj

hi I''m using restful_authentication and have controller specs working using users fixtures (and login_as) however i''ve been trying for hours without success to do it without fixtures, using mocks and stubs instead. anyone here done this? got code? :) thanks

Hi, has anyone here written a capistrano task for rspec to run through my specs on the deployed server? I''d appreciate a snippet or two to get me started. Thx linoj

Hi, I''m trying the specs for restful_authentication I found here http://jonathan.tron.name/articles/2007/01/02/rspec-on-rails-restful- authentication It seems to use custom .should methods: should_eql, should_be_an_instance_of, should_redirect_to, should_be_success, should_not_be_nil, should_be_nil, should_not_be_nil, should_be_empty, should_be_success, should_not_change, and

Hi, rather than flooding this list with separate emails, I''ve been queueing up questions using rspec with rails. (an irc channel would be nice too :) Here ya go... - Is there a way to test named routes? - Could I get an example how to test an ajax request (link_to_remote)? would that go in view? and/or in controller spec? - Can you assert which layout template is rendered in a

Hi, It appears that if I have 2 should_receives in a row, the latest one overrides the previous one(s). If there isn''t one, could we add a way to accumulate them, such as @thing.should_receive(:method).and_return(@value) @thing.should_receive(:method).again.and_return(@value) @thing.should_receive(:method).again.and_return(@value) would be equivalent to

Hi I''ve spec''d a class and they pass. Now I''d like to assure that any subclass of this class also passes the same specs. Any suggestions for a clever way to handle this? I''d prefer to keep the existing specs as is (eg instead of moving everything into shared behaviors, or doing something to all the ''describe'' lines) thanks linoj

I''m sure this is OT but I''d appreciate the help I''m using rspec_on_rails I prefer to use stable release rather than live dangerously (at least until I can tell the difference between what I might be doing wrong vs problems in rspec). However, I would like to try the RspecScaffoldGenerator fix. I installed (per the docs) last week with the following commands

does story runner have commandline options ,eg to add color to output?

hiya, in specing a partial, how can i assign a local var that is normally passed via :locals ? i tried adding :locals => to the render call but that doesnt seem to take linoj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071012/fd0acd92/attachment.html

hi, I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I''d start with a dead simple scenario: The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the home page, and begin exploring public pages from there. So, that seems like a good first story to spec out. And I''d really like to extract the actual link from the rendered page (rather than just

hi, is there a way to assert a flash message directly in story runner? Or do I have to go through the response text instead. Then "flash message should say success" do #flash[:notice].should == "User successfully invited" response.should have_text(/User successfully invited/) end linoj

fyi, there doesnt seem to be a link to rspec.lighthouse.com from the new web site (unless I missed it). I guess I expected it under "Community" linoj

Hi I have a couple of questions 1) how do you test the response inside a content_for block I see reference to it in the release notes but dont know where to find it (tried http://rspec.info/rdoc-rails/ ) 2) I dont seem to be able to stub partials in a different directory eg <%= render :partial => "foos/show" %> And I put this in the spec template.stub_render(:partial =>

I am not sure why the tests don''t see the call of the new method for the Address class. It can be seen in the controller method where the Address.new is called. >> @address = Address.new(params[:address]) What am I doing wrong? Thanks for the help. Here is the error message: Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ''UsersController handling POST /users should create a new

hi, When I run rake spec , it seems to be starting with my default environment (development or production) and connects to that database, before actually connecting to the test one and proceeding with the tests. When I remove the development database, the specs wont run. How do i initiate rspec to be test environment from the start? I dont see this when i run using script/spec linoj

Do have the latest versions? RSpec-1.0.3 ZenTest-3.6.0 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jonathan Linowes <jonathan at parkerhill.com> Date: May 29, 2007 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [rspec-users] questions rspec on rails To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> Hi, I should have mentioned I already did that. Here''s my spec.opts file --colour --format progress

hiya, i want the selector that would return a <tr> of a table if any td contains some text, so i can use it in click_link_within e.g. When I click the "show" link within the row containing "user at example.com" When /^I click the "(.+)" link within the row containing "(.+)"$/ do | link, text| selector = ?? click_link_within selector, link

Hey, I''m using rspec and rails and have a spec that tests if a before_filter is executed, I also have a spec that tests if a method called by the filter is executed. It appears however that when I should_receive something, it is no longer actually called when I fire the http request. I''m not sure how, or where exactly I should manually fire the filter, either before or after the