similar to: [Bug 517] bad "put" arg parsing

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517 Summary: bad "put" arg parsing Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: djm at

On 5/28/25 04:15, Pavel Krivitsky via R-devel wrote: > Dear All, > > Perhaps this should go in r-package-devel, but I suspect that this is > going to turn into a feature request, and I want to run it by the list > before filing it in the Bugzilla. > > I would like to specify a long string literal without making the line > of code too long. In R, > > "abc >

Tomas, Here is a good example of where this functionality would be useful: https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgislayers/blob/2b29f4c254e7e5a1dadce8d4b0015a70dfae39d4/R/arc-open.R#L19-L56 In order to prevent R CMD check notes I have to use `paste0()` to concatenate long URLs. If we were able to use `\` to separate the string across multiple lines, it would make the solution much nicer! On Mon, Jun

Dear All, Perhaps this should go in r-package-devel, but I suspect that this is going to turn into a feature request, and I want to run it by the list before filing it in the Bugzilla. I would like to specify a long string literal without making the line of code too long. In R, "abc def" yields the string "abc\def", and, as far as I can tell, there is no mechanism for

On 6/2/25 17:37, Josiah Parry wrote: > Tomas, > > Here is a good example of where this functionality would be useful: > https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgislayers/blob/2b29f4c254e7e5a1dadce8d4b0015a70dfae39d4/R/arc-open.R#L19-L56 > > In order to prevent R CMD check notes I have to use `paste0()` to > concatenate long URLs. If we were able to use `\` to > separate the string

Like Tomas, I find the paste0 readability to be **much** better, partly because it allows for better indentation (as Tomas pointed out). Perhaps a pointless email, but sometimes - for these subjective issues - it is worthwhile to point out a difference in opinion. Best, Kasper On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 12:27?PM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/2/25 17:37,

One could also argue that paste0("a", "b", "c") is a function call that needs to be evaluated at runtime, whereas "abc" is a string constant understood by the parser, and often also language agnostic. I'd assume compilers and code- and text-search tools do a better job with the latter. /Henrik On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 2:18?PM Josiah Parry

I suppose taste is learned as well. It does feel quite odd that the best way to define a long string without a note or text wrapping is by being creative with functions. This is valid in Python, Julia, and Rust (if you add `let` and a terminating semi-colon): my_str = "part1\ part2\ part2" I don't think it is abnormal to expect or desire this type of functionality in our favorite

> On 3 Jun 2025, at 09:34, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > > One could also argue that paste0("a", "b", "c") is a function call that needs to be evaluated at runtime, whereas "abc" is a string constant understood by the parser, and often also language agnostic. I'd assume compilers and code- and text-search tools

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=505 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |pablo@netfilter.org Version|CVS (please indicate |1.1.2 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net

Hi Damien, Damien Miller wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:04:41PM +1000: > ok, djm@ Thanks for checking, and thanks to Val and Michael for testing. I just committed the patch to OpenBSD, others will likely take care of merging it to -portable. > (I'd prefer the comment before the return statement, but up to you) Immediately before the return statement, it looked really confusing,

Hi, I have one question on expand.grid() function. When I write following syntax :expand.grid(c("u", "l"), c("u", "l"), c("u", "l")) I get following as desired : Var1 Var2 Var3 1 u u u 2 l u u 3 u l u 4 l l u 5 u u l 6 l u l 7 u l l 8 l l l However

Full_Name: Neil Tiffin Version: R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26) OS: [R.app GUI 1.30 (5511) i386-apple-darwin9.8.0] Submission from: (NULL) (99.68.31.116) In the help section 'INSTALL {utils}' half way down the page the line Use R CMD INSTALL ?help for concise usage information, including all the available options should have two '-' in front of help. Therefor it should read

Asterisk 11.1.0 One queue with strategy=leastrecent. (Full queues.conf below.) Occasionally (several times today), a caller will get "stuck" in the queue - there are operators available to take the call, but the caller stays in the queue for a long time. Any idea what might cause this, or where I can start looking to debug it? I'm going to start digging through the queue log

Hi All, Renato wrote: >As they say: if it's not broken, don't fix it. >Let's talk about the reductions that AVX512 and SVE can't handle with IR semantics, but let's not change the current IR semantics for no reason. Main problem for SVE: We can't write straight-line IR instruction sequence for reduction last value compute, without knowing #elements in vector to

That seems mostly reasonable. I'd try to make it more concise, though. The coding standards and developer policy docs should be short. +Commit message +-------------- + +Although we don't enforce the format of commit messages, there are general +guidelines that will help review, search in logs, email formatting and so on. +Mostly, the rules that apply are similar to other git

Hi, Is there a concise/ruby way to do the following: [Note: 1 and 2 below are not related.] (1) for p in 0...@order.line_items[k].shipment_lines.length shipline_qty = shipline_qty + @order.line_items[k].shipment_lines[p].quantity end (2) ts = Array.new for tk in s.trackings ts.push(tk) end

These safe wrappers around Pervasives.open_in and Pervasives.open_out ensure that exceptions escaping cannot leave unclosed files. --- common/mlstdutils/std_utils.ml | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- common/mlstdutils/std_utils.mli | 12 +++++++++++ common/mltools/tools_utils.ml | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------- dib/dib.ml | 9 ++++----

Dear R people, I have a simple question to ask. Suppose I have a data.frame with two variables: one factor (x) and one numeric (y), I want to calculate the mean of y for each value of x. Although it's easy to do it within a for a loop, I believe there may be a concise way by using some kinds of "apply" functions. Could anyone tell me how to do that? Thank you. Frank

Hello, Can anyone tell me the format for meetme list concise command, so that I know what field is what (separated by '!'s) Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130815/eba161be/attachment.htm>