similar to: firewall dilemma

From: Jean-Christian de Rivaz <jc at eclis.ch> I suspect that some instructions about how to use the diag/mbr was not updated when the source file was renamed to handoff.S. Here is a simple proposition to fix that. Jean-Christian de Rivaz --- diag/mbr/README | 4 ++-- diag/mbr/handoff.S | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/diag/mbr/README

Hai, Verify dig -x $(hostname -i) Then dig A $(hostname -f) As long as these match any CNAME should work. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: maandag 11 mei 2020 9:21 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Unable to access shares by server

Samba 4.0.0 I am running all of these commands from the PDC DC1. /etc/resolv.conf domain mydomain.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 smb.conf does have a dns forwarder = 192.168.1.2 samba-001 the actual host name, and also a PDC, in the same domain. I would like to have the alias my-server point to samba-001. I added a CNAME record: bin/samba-tool dns add 127.0.0.1 mydomain.com my-server CNAME

Hi All, I'm using samba 4.0.0alpha21-GIT-UNKNOWN provisioned to use the internal dns server. I'm having a bit of trouble adding a CNAME entry, or more correctly, getting it to resolve after adding. Prior to adding the CNAME a query returns (the relevant record); Name=centos, Records=1, Children=0 A: 192.168.1.11 (flags=f0, serial=2, ttl=900) It's more than likely me doing

Hello, It seems Samba4 is having problems with CNAME records. I am seeing the same behavior as mentioned in the thread below. Is there any ETA on a fix for this? This is identical to the problem with MX records. This is currently a much bigger problem than the MX records. I appreciate any assistance. [root at DC1 var]# dig autodiscover.testdom.com CNAME ; <<>> DiG

On 22/05/2020 06:38, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: >> Verify dig -x $(hostname -i) >> Then dig A $(hostname -f) >> >> As long as these match any CNAME should work. > These works, but why these should match a CNAME? hostname returns the "main" host... > > Anyway to make a test I configured a new CNAME > > #?dig server.wdc.mydomain.it > ;; ANSWER

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:38:31PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > isohdpfc pushes the CX value to the stack which it gets from INT 13 AH 41. > Quite surely bit 0 of that CX is not set. But bit 2 "Enhanced Disk Drive" > could be set. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INT_13H > > I understand on David's BIOS after > > andw $1,%cx

On 02/03/2020 11:51, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > On 02/03/2020 10:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Does your DC have a fixed IP and if not, why not ? > > Yes, using netplan in Ubuntu 18.04... > > network: > ? ethernets: > ??? ens18: > ????? addresses: > ????? - 130.130.0.218/16 > ????? gateway4: 130.130.0.1 > ????? nameservers: > ???????

Thanks for the suggestion Rowland, I had already tried that though and both secondary DC's resolve.... host -t CNAME fbce444a-8707-4c69-8066-d75aacfb07f0._msdcs.mydomain.com. fbce444a-8707-4c69-8066-d75aacfb07f0._msdcs.mydomain.com is an alias for dc02.mydomain.com. host -t CNAME 04225dbe-d69c-4ea5-8930-eb8746790180._msdcs.mydomain.com.

Ok I'll try that in the morning and will get back with the resilt. On 30 September 2016 at 21:22, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:24:45 +0100 > "Maton, Brett" <matonb at ltresources.co.uk> wrote: > > > Thanks for the suggestion Rowland, I had already tried that though > > and both secondary

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > My main point of interest is which block is really loaded as first one > of isolinux.bin. [Program snipped.] > (It could be shorter if i did not insist in big endian words.) Why insisting? Anyway appended is a dumper version. I could put up a binery version if needed. Let me know if so. -- MartinS /*

Guys, what i noticed. Look at this. Refused- 1/3/0 (Class 254) ( /24 ) Paully used /16 update 1/3/1 (Class 254) CNAME V-RDS02.mydomain.com CNAME ? And, if he uses in his example samba-tool dns add dc3 mydomain.com V-RDS02 A 130.130.0.252 A record was used. Is resolv.conf checked and it is sure in pointing to the correct DNS of the AD first? addresses: -

Apologies for not replying to the thread, I just subscribed to the list, after a day of troubleshooting this. Regarding: 9601, 'WERR_DNS_ERROR_ZONE_DOES_NOT_EXIST' I am experiencing the same symptoms, in a simpler environment than the original submitter at the previous thread: Single Windows 2008R2 Domain Controller Schema version 47 No MS Exchange Attempting to add a Samba 4 domain

Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so, please point me to a better listserv), but is there anything "wrong" RFC or best practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server? (I'm using EveryDNS.net, and I'd like to make my CNAME records ns1-> 4.myDomain.com correspond to ns1->ns4.EveryDNS.net.) -------------- next part -------------- An

In the shower this morning, I realized that samba's dlz is through its ldap interface, probably through dhcp. :) All of that work researching how to set up a dlz database for naught. This is NOT documented in either: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS or https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD I have not yet checked any ldap documentation on the wiki to

I think I'm missing some SRV records... Calling nsupdate for SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._ sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.com dc03.mydomain.com 389 (add) Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION:

I have just joined a second DC to my Samba based AD, with Bind9_DLZ providing the DNS on DC2 (samba internal on DC1). I notice that the AD zone has not acquired an NS entry pointing to DC2. I presume that ideally such an entry should exist? I have tried to add something, but I cannot work out how to use samba-tool to add an RR for the root of a zone. If I miss the name argument out, or if I

i thought i would run up a fedora 8 installation and take a look around, my default kickstart installation includes puppet which shouldn''t be a problem however the puppet client fails with Certificates were not trusted: hostname was not match with the server certificate The cause is obvious, the hostname of my puppetmaster is ''puppet1.mydomain.com'' and

In the docs it says one must add a line to the /etc/hosts file with the name "puppet" and the IP of the puppet master. This isn''t a possibility for us as the IP is subject to change. Is it possible to configure the puppet clients to look for a specific domain to find the master? eg. "puppetmaster.mydomain.com"? If so, how/where can this be configured? -- You received

Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23 This is the error that I get gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../src/lib-sieve -I../../../src/lib-sieve/util -I../../../src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment -I/home/jc/rpmbuild/BUILD/dovecot-2.2.23/src/imap