similar to: [Bug 549] Login Delay / Remove unwanted reverse map check

Hi SSH developers, I am wondering if someone could help explain a behavior of sshd. From canohost.c, get_remote_hostname(), it seems sshd will always try to reverse lookup the ip address of any client that attaches to it. The verify_reverse_mapping flag just turns off the forward lookup through DNS of the clients hostname, once the hostname has been determined. I am using Solaris 8 with ssh

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-06-03 10:28

Hi, I've gone and ported the latest version of openssh, 3.1p1, to GNU/Hurd. I've tried to learn from the other threads on this topic, but I still had to get rid of MAXHOSTNAMELEN where I could. James A. Morrison diff -urN openssh-3.1p1.old/Makefile.in openssh-3.1p1/Makefile.in --- openssh-3.1p1.old/Makefile.in Tue Feb 26 14:24:22 2002 +++ openssh-3.1p1/Makefile.in Tue Apr 9 16:16:49

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 devin.nate at bridgecomm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #980 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #39 from devin.nate at bridgecomm.net 2006-02-21 14:08

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ildefonso_camargo at yahoo.com ------- Comment #42 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-06-20 09:32 ------- *** Bug 1198 has been marked

Hi, openssh-1.2.2p1 seems to have 2 problems on ipv6 (and ipv4 mapped addresses). 1. "BREAKIN ATTEMPT" warnings from ipv4 node 2. X forwarding The following patche fixes them. Thanks. diff -ru openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c --- openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c Fri Jan 14 13:45:48 2000 +++ openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c Wed Mar 8 00:25:18 2000 @@

Hi, I'm working on some project which is sort of log filter. Last few days I noticed that there are some wacky people scanning sshd port all the time from anywhere. Although sshd reports it with syslog error message which is very helpful, I'd like to know the source ip address with following message: canohost.c: around line #100 if (getaddrinfo(name, NULL, &hints, &aitop) !=

I'm seeing something similar to bug 1179 (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179), even with the reordered IP options check. For some reason, getsockopt is returning an IP options of length 2, value 00 00. Would Mark Weindling's original patch (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1105) break anything if I incorporated it? Platform: HP NonStop S7000 series

The Kerberos V support may still fail on hosts with two or more interfaces. Regards Markus -------------- next part -------------- *** auth-krb5.c.orig Mon May 20 11:51:57 2002 --- auth-krb5.c Mon May 20 11:53:34 2002 *************** *** 38,43 **** --- 38,44 ---- #include "servconf.h" #include "uidswap.h" #include "auth.h" + #include "canohost.h"

Hi, here's a patch so that ssh also supports hurd-i386. Thanks for incorporating. The patch comes from Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe at orcus.priv.at>. > openssh 2.2.0p1-1.1 does not build on the Hurd. The appended patch > fixes that. Changes in detail: > * PAM is not (yet?) supported, so the PAM dependencies are only put into > the control file on architectures != hurd-i386.

Hi All. While working on something I noticed a regression failure on Solaris 8. It turned out to be present in -cvs and wasn't due to my changes. One of the tests that fail is basically: ssh -2 -F $build/regress/ssh_proxy 999.999.999.999 true The server reports: sshd[20529]: Disconnecting: Command terminated on signal 11. The culprit seems to be session.c line 1019 or so: snprintf(buf,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689 Summary: Improper reverse IP lookup Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: berkvist at

Hello, I've trawled archives looking for changes in the "AllowUsers" option, manuals, changes log, reported bugs and to my surprise I can't find anything or anyone that has reported the issues that I am experiencing. I am using the default installation sshd_config file as supplied by Redhat and the only options I have changed are: ListenAddress AllowUsers The first problem

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote: > In article <Pine.BSO.4.44.0404292059520.953-100000 at etoh.eviladmin.org> (at Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:26 -0500 (CDT)), Ben Lindstrom <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> says: > > > Be that true.. then one should review the usage of it in sshconnect.c > > which is the other place we do it. >

Dear useRs, When I'm using Hmisc's latex() function with ctable=TRUE on a summary.formula with method="reverse" object and saving in a .tex file, the latter contains an unwanted empty line which makes compilation fail. Here is a brief example : library(Hmisc) test <- data.frame(a=sample(1:30,10),b=sample(c("good","bad","ugly"),10,replace=T))

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63135 Priority: medium Bug ID: 63135 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [bisected] G69/nv50 DisplayPort dual-head fails to switch to KMS QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 Summary: UseDNS option ignored Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: pavel.krejci at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at

Hi all, I want to fit data called "metal" with a polynominal function as dP ~ a.0 + a.1 * U0 + a.2 * U0^2 + a.3 * U0^3 + a.4 * U0^4 The data set includes, the independant variable U0 and the dependant variable dP. I've seen that the combination of lm() and poly() can do that instead of using the nls() function. But I don't get how to interpret the results from the linear