similar to: [Bug 14] Can't change expired /etc/shadow password without PAM

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #215 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-02-20 20:51 -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |463 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-17 15:18 ------- Scott Burch found a bug in the PAM+PrivSep case

Hello, Can "openssh-passexpire18.patch" be used on "openssh-3.6.1p1" for solaris? I have downloaded above patch from "http://www.zip.com.au/~dtucker/openssh/". It looks like I was not successful in applying it. Thanks..

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ------- Additional Comments From dwd at bell-labs.com 2001-11-10 08:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=5) add suggested patch ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org|stevesk at pobox.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEW ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-05-12 04:04 ------- i'm not immediately positive if no_port_forwarding_flag=1 is sufficient. need to investigate more. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 Bug 14 depends on bug 463, which changed state. Bug 463 Summary: PrintLastLog doesn't work in privsep mode http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |627 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-01-09 23:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=199) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=199&action=view) Implement password change via /bin/passwd in session. openssh-passexpire10.patch: * Implementes shadow and AIX password expiry. * Adds general expire_message

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |793 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521 Summary: PAM authentication not working in privilege seperation mode running in trusted system on hp-ux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: HPPA OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd

Dear All I am using rgenoud to solve the following maximization problem: myfunc <- function(x) { x1 <- x[1] x2 <- x[2] if (x1^2+x2^2 > 1) return(-9999999) else x1+x2 } genoud(myfunc, nvars=2, Domains=rbind(c(0,1),c(0,1)),max=TRUE,boundary.enforcement=2,solution.tolerance=0.000001) How can one increase the precision of the solution $par [1] 0.7072442 0.7069694 ? I

Hello! I need to purchase a new box, which I would like to optimize for good R performance. For the record, I will run Fedora Core 5 as and OS, and I wanted to know if anyone has experience with how the following affects R performance: - Is there a big advantage to having a 64-bit CPU over having a 32-bit? - Does an Opteron offer any advantages over an Athlon, and if yes, does it justify an

Hello! I need to compare 2 datasets whether they come from the same distribution. I use function ks.boot{Matching}. And what is the confidence level of the p-value, returned by ks.boot function? The code is: set=read.table("http://stella.sai.msu.ru:8080/~gala/data/testsets.csv", header=T,sep=',') set1=set[!is.na(set$set1),'set1']

I am having difficulties compiling openssh3.6p2 under AIX 5.2. I grabbed the latest from the contrib section from openssh.com, applied passexpire19.patch successfully and configure --prefix=/opt/freeware/ --with xauth=/usr/bin/X11/xauth. i get the following @ the end of the make: In file included from auth.c:41: /usr/include/usersec.h:656: warning: `struct aud_rec' declared inside parameter

I am trying to determine whether two samples are identical or not. I'm aware that somebody can use the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test to compare empirical distributions, but since my samples have ties I'm not sure if I'm getting the right p-values for the comparison. Can the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test be adjusted for the case when ties exists and are there any functions that already

To anyone who uses the Match() function in the Matching library... How do you go about deciding how many matches you will use? With my data, my standard errors generally get smaller if I use more matches. Speaking of standard errors, when correcting for heteroscedasticity, how many matches do you use (this is the Var.cal option). It seems to me that it might make sense to use the same number

Does anyone else find that using the Var.calc option (for heteroscedasticity consistent std. errors) in Match() (from the Matching library) slows down computation of the matching estimator by a lot? I don't really understand why when I use this option it slows down so much, but for me it does significantly. I want to use the heteroscedasticity consistent std. errors in my project, but as long

I'm interested in doing multinomial logistic regression with equality constraints on some of the parameter values. For example, with categorical outcomes Y_1 (baseline), Y_2, and Y_3, and covariates X_1 and X_2, I might want to impose the equality constraint that \beta_{2,1} = \beta_{3,2} that is, that the effect of X_1 on the logit of Y_2 is the same as the effect of X_2 on the

Hi R users, "genoud" function of "rgenoud" package will optimize my function. If opt = genoud(fn,2,max=TRUE,starting.value=c(1,10),........) opt$value will give the optimized value of the function, "fn". My problem is from the same opt, can I get the value of the function at the initial parameter values? I need the initial value of the function for