similar to: 3.6.1p1 SRPMS?

Ville Herva [mailto:vherva@niksula.hut.fi] wrote: > Of course, whether O_TEXT is defined or not does not > necessarily imply the availability of "t", but I > can't think of better alternative. Stratus VOS implements O_TEXT and O_BINARY but does not recognize "t". We have the options defined in ANS C and in POSIX. I'm at home and don't have my reference

A simple opengl app that used to work quite fine with wine. Newest CVS, has been like this for some time: ============================================================================ FIXME:pthread_rwlock_rdlock FIXME:pthread_rwlock_unlock Could not stat /mnt/teapot/movies (Input/output error), ignoring drive H: Warning: the temporary directory '/mnt/fat/temp' (specified in wine

Hi, We use rsync on NT (server and client) and we get errors on filenames with a path that has in total more than 256 characters. This seems to be caused by a limit in rsync, not in NT. Is there a way to break this limit withuo having to manually shorten all this filenames? Thx already! Rgds, Bart Coninckx Network Administrator CNE, ASE ************************************* Watco ICT Services

I've been running rsync-2.4.2 with an old patch of mine for some time for backup purposes. Due to the recent remote bug, I thought it was time to upgrade, even if the host was behind a firewall. So I dug up the old patch (2.5.2 version attached), that I think I sent ages ago to this list as well. It does the following: (1) Firstly, the only sensible way to run something as

I recently set up a new RHEL4 server with samba-3.0.10 in a Windows 2003 server PDC domain. I can log on as one user from different workstations on to the new samba server. With several other users, I get this error: Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: krb5_rd_req(CIFS/samba-server@MY.DOM) failed: Wrong principal in request Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: [2005/10/18 16:41:34,

It's sometimes desired to be able to alter login policy depending upon how the person was connecting for the ssh server. For example you might want different rules on the internal and external interface of a gateway. In another setup you might want an sshd with a different login policy running on a different port - and setup different firewalling rules (for example). I have implemented such

Hi all, I am looking for a chroot-patch like it was available for the 3.5p1 version. Does anybody has such a patch? Because chroot doesn't work with 3.6.1p1 under Reliant Unix 5.45 from Fujitsu-Siemens. regards Stephan Dr. Stephan Hendl Systemmanagement ----------------------------------- Landesbetrieb f?r Datenverarbeitung und Statistik Land Brandenburg Adresse: 14467 Potsdam, Dortustr.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907 Summary: please include systemd service file Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 URL: https://github.com/zabbal/nftables-systemd OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

I compiled OpenSSH 3.6.1p1 on NCR MP-RAS v4.3 (or at least "uname -a"'s output of 4.0.3.0 suggests v4.3, I'm not positive). I was able to compile zlib (1.1.4) and openssl (0.9.7a) with little trouble. OpenSSH took hand-hacking the includes.h file as follows: diff -cr openssh-3.6.1p1/includes.h openssh-3.6.1p1-customized/includes.h *** openssh-3.6.1p1/includes.h Sun Oct 20

Hi, with a low soft limit on file descriptors, dovecot 2.2.15 warns on startup: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (256 < 1000), because of default_client_limit It could try increasing the limit first, and only report the warning if that fails. I'm attaching a patch that does just this. Without the patch, the soft fd limit is kept at whatever it

Hello, Can "openssh-passexpire18.patch" be used on "openssh-3.6.1p1" for solaris? I have downloaded above patch from "http://www.zip.com.au/~dtucker/openssh/". It looks like I was not successful in applying it. Thanks..

I can't seem to find autofs-4.1.3-131.src.rpm on the download mirrors... I notice that there are not many SRPMS in the 4.1 /centos/4.1/os/SRPMS directory on the download mirrors - is this because most can be found under /centos/4.0/os/SRPMS and /centos/4.0/updates/SRPMS? - or should all the 4.1 SRPMS be in /centos/4.1/os/SRPMS ? Thanks James Pearson

Hi, Can someone tell me when the 7.3 srpms will be available? They are usually in vault but I do not see them at this time. I need the centos-release srpm ASAP. Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me123 at tdiehl.org

Are the 5.7 source RPMs going to be mirrored to http://www.<my favorite mirror>/centos/ 5.7/os/SRPMS/ and http://www.<my favorite mirror>/centos/ 5.7/updates/SRPMS/ as was the case for the previous releases ? Or are they permanently banished to http://vault.centos.org/5.7/ as per the readme.txt currently in place on most mirrors ? Thanks -- Dave Baukus

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Ville Syrjala > <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> >> >> Replace the ad-hoc iturbt_709 property with the new standard >> COLOR_ENCODING property. Compiles, but not tested.

I've corresponded with several different techs at a major dedicated webhosting provider and they too so far have not been able to determine why the newest version of OpenSSH 3.7.1p1 is conflicting with PAM on our server running RedHat linux 6.2. I've also tried installing 3.7.1p1 on other RedHat 6.2 servers and the exact same PAM problems. But on 7.1 RedHat servers I've had absolutely

Howdy folks, $ cd /opt/mirrors/centos/4.2 $ find -type f | grep "\.rpm" | while read i; do rpm -K "$i"; done | egrep -v ": \(sha1\) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK\$" centosplus/SRPMS/reiserfs-utils-3.6.19-2.1.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK extras/SRPMS/drbd-0.7.14-1.centos4.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK extras/SRPMS/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS:

On 12/13/2016 johnny at centos.org wrote: >On 12/13/2016 06:25 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can someone tell me when the 7.3 srpms will be available? >> >> They are usually in vault but I do not see them at this time. >> >> I need the centos-release srpm ASAP. > >All the SRPMS are available from buildlogs. For centos-release

Hello, I just managed to compile openssh-3.6.1p1 on Ultrix/MIPS. One of the fixes needed for this is the following. It's because of: --- According to the Changelog - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2002/12/10 19:26:50 [packet.c] move tos handling to packet_set_tos; ok provos/henning/deraadt --- This IP_TOS is now nicely stuffed in a function, but that function should be #defined

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> We now have per-device driver_features, so let's use that to disable atomic only for pre-nv50. Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>