similar to: [Bug 537] Identification should depend on port number

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |misiek at pld.org.pl ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-03-27 21:35 ------- *** Bug 523 has been marked as a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94 ------- Additional Comments From jprondak at visualmedia.com 2002-02-02 09:15 ------- Created an attachment (id=17) Patch to sshd to allow a userdefinable identification string ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1198 Summary: ssh associates the host identification to just IP/hostname , and it should also include remote port. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

Hi I was wondering if libvirt/KVM screens out a CPU's or Protected Processor Identification Number? - "PPIN" is a universal hardware serial number etched into the chip in the fab. [1] I am currently allowing full host cpu passthrough to allow guests to use spectre/meltdown mitigations. However as we are a privacy project, we are looking to prevent obvious identity linkers like

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037 Summary: Man page for -L and -R should mention -g Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523 Summary: ssh saves only host/ip information in known_hosts while port information is missing Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh

I'm seeing lines like the following in my security logs: Oct 14 06:56:32 srv sshd[41370]: Bad protocol version identification '\200b\001\003\001' from 24.203.221.239 From what I've read, this is a buffer overflow attack on the sshd whereby the attacker triggers the overflow before the identification string is sent then attempts commands to see if elevated priveleges were

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.45 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending confirmed My bad, sorry. --- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/ssh 6 Jul 2006 10:16:41 -0000 1.18 +++ rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/ssh 7 Jul 2006 19:35:19 -0000 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sshd\[[0-9]+\]: refused connect from [:[:alnum:].]+ \([:[:alnum:].]+\)$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}

Does anyone out there know if it is possible to discover the dialed number when a line in an analog hunt group rings? I can't get a straight answer from our IT folks. We have a 5ess switch delivering 4 analog lines which are in a simple hunt group servicing our lab. I would like to have a different call attendant based on which number is dialed so that I can route the calls to the

Hi, I'm writing a little API in java that read/write ogg's comments (in the comment header), as well as reading the information header. All the "read" part is done and is working well, but I am having a little problem while coding the "write" part of the API. In the docs (I use http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html#id4726648), I founded everything

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 Summary: Protocol version identification errors don't log the sender IP anymore, always UNKNOWN Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: sshd

Hi, We'd like sshd to listen on port 22 with PasswordAuthentication = no and port 2222 with PasswordAuthentication = yes. At the moment, it seems the only way to do this is to run two sshds, one per port. Since Match blocks already allow PasswordAuthentication to be set, if the Match keyword itself allowed testing of the server port to which the incoming connection was made then we could do

Hi everybody, I've connected Asterisk 1.2.5 (libpri 1.2.2, zaptel 1.2.4, Linux 2.6.13.2) to an Avaya-Tenovis PBX via a PRI/E1-line. Calls from SIP-phones via * to the PBX work fine. However, incoming calls to * only result in: -- XXX Missing handling for mandatory IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) XXX -- which seems to be an * problem, because a Windows-fax-machine works fine on a PRI

Hello, I am trying to apply the "called party identification" patch (patch 8824) and managed to make it work with a static data. Where do I take the name of the called person (the "equivalent" of CALLERID, but the other way...)? BTW, one note to the above patch: To make it work the device should have the parameter sendrpid set to true.

Does * support Called Party Identification? Say for example, I dial extension 2000, SIP sends back John Doe from the sip.conf file where extension 2000 is defined? Would this violate the SIP RFC? - Brent

We received a notice from our pci-dss auditors respecting this: CVE-2002-0510 The UDP implementation in Linux 2.4.x kernels keeps the IP Identification field at 0 for all non-fragmented packets, which could allow remote attackers to determine that a target system is running Linux. The NVD entry for which contains this note: CHANGE> [Cox changed vote from REVIEWING to NOOP] Cox> So I

Hi, While creating identification header in the function * theora_encode_heade*r in *encoder_toplevel.c*, it assigns bits not mentioned in the current theora spec released on Octomber 29, 2007 (page 40 &41). But this implementation in function* theora_encode_heade*r is correct according to the *Figure 6.2 (page 42)*. But not according to the *table mentioned in pages 40 &

Dear R users, I need to fit an ARMA model. As far as I've seen, EACF (extended ACF) is not available in R. 1. Let's say I fit a series of ARMA models in a loop. Given the code/output included below, how do I pull 'Model' and 'Fit' (AIC) from each summary() so that I can combine them into an array/data frame to be sorted by AIC? 2. Apart from EACF, are you aware perhaps

I was just helping someone track down why they were getting a "Bad protocol version identification" error for sshd, and I noticed that it was logging that the connection was coming from UNKNOWN. It looks like when this error condition is triggered, the socket is closed and then the error is logged. Unfortunately the logging calls get_remote_ipaddr, which returns UNKNOWN if there is no

>>Yehavi wrote: >> > I am trying to apply the "called party identification" >> > patch (patch 8824) and managed to make it work with a >> > static data. Where do I take the name of the called person >> > (the "equivalent" of CALLERID, but the other way...)? Asnwering myself: I am using realtime extensions, so I've added call to