similar to: IPv6 support?

hi i have problems with the X11 forwarding, TCP port forwarding works fine: the tcp ports bind to ipv4 and ipv6 localhost, but the X11 port (6010) binds ONLY to the ipv6 localhost, which does not work with the normal ipv4 programs :-( is this a bug, or is this an hidden feature mfg hermann redhat 7.1: openSSH 3.2.2: [mrq1 at xxxx mrq1]$ ssh -X -L 10000:localhost:22 localhost Last login: Thu

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote: > On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote: > > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August > > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there > > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for > >

Hi, I am running sshd (openssh-2.9p2) on a power-pc LynxOS box, and am connecting from a ssh client (openssh-2.9p2) on an x86 Linux box. This works fine for ssh protocol version 1, but am getting the below error for ssh v2: Disconnecting: Bad packet length -857542839. I am also attaching the complete debug traces from sshd & ssh below. I am not sure if this is an "endian" issue.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851 Summary: IPv6 SNAT target with --random doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=852 Summary: IPv6 TEE target sends packets to original IP address on wrong network device Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: unknown

Hi, I've made a patch to support IPv6 ACL. Patch is available at <ftp://ftp.linux-ipv6.org/pub/usagi/misc/rsync-2_5_5-v6auth-20021016.patch.gz> Thanks in advance. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

Hi, I think we should try other AF for "x11_use_localhost" case. --- openssh-3.1p1/channels.c Tue Mar 5 10:57:45 2002 +++ openssh-3.1p1-fix/channels.c Thu May 2 21:26:28 2002 @@ -2356,6 +2356,13 @@ continue; } } +#ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY + if (ai->ai_family == AF_INET6) { + int on = 1; + if (setsockopt(sock, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &on, sizeof(on)) < 0)

Hi List, i'm trying to join a Windows 2000 SP4 Domain (Native mode). I'm getting the following error while joining: # net ads join -U 'Administrator%password' Using short domain name -- W2K Could not connect to server dc.w2k.bitebene.org Connection failed: NT_STATUS_NOLOGON_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT Failed to verify membership in domain:

Looks like more iotlb locking mess? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000 > > vhost: new device IOTLB API > > bisection log:

Looks like more iotlb locking mess? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000 > > vhost: new device IOTLB API > > bisection log:

Hi, I am trying to setup ipsec tunnel between Freebsd (host1) and Linux (host2) systems.And I also interested in executing some ipsec test cases( Like TAHI conformance test suite) on the same connection. Please, suggest me some details regarding this setup and Specify any materials which can be obtained from from any locations(site).. I have enabled IPSec support for FreeBSD (4.11 Release) and

W dniu 23.09.2015 o 15:30, Timo Sirainen pisze: > http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz.sig > > A lot of changes since v2.2.18, so here's a release candidate first. If no bugs are reported, I'm planning on making the final release sometimes this week. The most interesting new features here

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey everyone.. been struggling with building a mailserver and i'm almost done. One of the last pieces is integrating dovecot with dspam so that I'm users can train their spam filters easily (sieve filtering is the last piece left.. that should be interesting.. lol) Anyway, I think i found an issue with memory allocation, and I'm not sure

i am hoping this attachment gets through. It deals with bug in ping that made it very difficult to set up a system with two gateways. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091009/ddfc8176/attachment-0004.html> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, A thought for the list. As I mentioned in another posting, there are a lot of QoS mechanisms out there. Linux supports some, but not all. Some patchsets add others, but don''t work for all kernels. There are also userland implementations, usually sitting in software routers, but there are other packages. Would it be helpful if I worked on a table of what''s out there for

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060509/ec1f5ba0/attachment.pgp

Howdy, I've been working with a new CentOS installation and this is my first experience with dovecot. I would like dovecot to provide more logging, however I'm not finding much on how to alter it's logging. http://wiki.dovecot.org/DovecotFeatures speaks of having Logging Control. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. -- Edward Chase Providence College Information

Maybe I were not clear in my previous mail, or maybe we are talking about different topics. My point was, if the pair of memory accesses are direct access, in most cases, the base/offset/size should be able to sufficient to figure out if they are alias or not. A tricky case would be subscripped variables, like a.b[i][j] vs a.c[m][n] where a.c and b.c are enclosed in a common union. If

subscripe

subscripe samba diem herbert --- Diem Herbert : Atominst.d.Oest.Univ. Computing Division --- Schuettelstr.115 : Mail: Diem@ATI.ac.at --- A-1020 Vienna Austria : Tel : +43 1 72701-226 FAX: -7289220