similar to: UDP over SSH avalible

Hi! I have small question. Are there plans to include UDP port forwarding in OpenSSH? Lastly I have modified OpenSSH 3.4 both demon and client to support that kind of functionality. Waiting for answers Greets, Liquid --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- Tanie bilety lotnicze! http://samoloty.onet.pl

It is going to be easy question to you. I've started to interest in model-based clustering. Adrian E. Raftery "Recent Advances in Model-Based Clustering: Image Segmentation and Variable Selection" (www.stat.washington.edu/Raftery)showed that we can compare different classification methods using BIC statistic. For diabetes dataset the best model is VVV model with 3 classes- for this

Hello, xen-4.6.3-14.el6.x86_64 is in testing since 5th of May. Isn't it production ready yet? It fixes 3 XSAs... Regards, -- Piotr Gackiewicz Intertele S.A. - operator system?w ITL.PL i DOMENY.ITL.PL al. T. Rejtana 10, 35-310 Rzesz?w TEL: +48 17 8507580, FAX: +48 17 8520275 http://www.itl.pl - niezawodne us?ugi hostingowe http://domeny.itl.pl - tanie domeny internetowe

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/18/2017 04:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> There are new xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 in the testing >> repository on buildlogs.centos.org. >> >> Can we please get some testing of these RPMs and feedback to this list. >> > > > Any testing or feedback on these 4.6.6 rpms? It would suck if I was

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, > with the one config file change) working for everyone: > > (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) Hello. Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been signalling it before: 4.9.* kernels do not work well for me any more (and for other people

----- Forwarded message from =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3 Siwek?= <lordtm@poczta.onet.pl> ----- From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3 Siwek?= <lordtm@poczta.onet.pl> Subject: Few questions... Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 9:45:25 +0200 To: mailman@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: onet.poczta X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HTML_10_20,INVALID_DATE,USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO version=2.55

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652 Mariusz Kielpinski <kielpi at poczta.onet.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kielpi at poczta.onet.pl Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #3 from

Below I post the scenario where user can lost access to the file with winbindd 4.6.x (DEV2+dev2user1000 has default group other then "domain users"): root at host:~# su DEV2+dev2user105 DEV2+dev2user105 at host:/$ whoami DEV2+dev2user105 DEV2+dev2user105 at host:/$ > /testfile DEV2+dev2user105 at host:/$ ls -al /testfile -rw-r--r-- 1 DEV2+dev2user105 DEV2+domain users 0 May 31

On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > > I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config > file diff? I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig. It has implied several other internal configurations changes. Overall differencess (config file patch) is in attachment. But my considerations about compiled in PATA etc., instead of modules, remain

Hello CentOS Xen Heroes, Yesterday, I have installed testing kernel 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64 from virt-xen-testing repo. It crashed today morning. Hardware is a pretty ancient, testing machine (CO6 PV guests only), but had no problems yet. It was stable on 4.9*, including testing 4.9.15-22.el6.x86_64 Console output: [59826.069427] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [59826.069463] Modules

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >>>> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >>>>

Hi, I want to build a planning availabilities per users. I already have an idea but I don''t know if it is the easiest one to implement. I already have a user model. I could create a unavailabilites table with these columns: id, from, to, user_id And I have a calendar view where i check for each hours of the day the unavailabilities. And then I am able to build the unavailabilities table.

Additionally if I authenticate to user using wbinfo -a it seems to works correctly: root at root:~$ id DEV2+guest uid=2000501(DEV2+guest) gid=2000513(DEV2+domain users) groups=2000513(DEV2+domain users),2000501(DEV2+guest),2000514(DEV2+domain guests) root at root:~$ wbinfo -a DEV2+guest Enter DEV2+guest's password: plaintext password authentication succeeded Enter DEV2+guest's password:

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

This graph -> http://www.math.hope.edu/~tanis/dallas/images/disth36.gif is an example I found at http://www.math.hope.edu/~tanis/dallas/disth1.html created by Maple. Does anybody know how to create something similar in R? I have a feeling it could be possible using scatterplot3d (perhaps with type=h, the fourth example in help('scatterplot3d')?), but I cannot figure it out. Thanks in

See, /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max try to change value from this file to a higher value. It may happen. If it doesn''t help go keep mailing me :). No i didn''t overcome my problem yet. But I''m close. I did what i sad in the first line of my mail and it help for some time. I think htb has some kind of defect when using ds_mark. When I were shaping download only using

Hello Oll(y) :) After rebuilding whole database, I'm getting error: Error seeking to block: Invalid argument (in ruby and php binding), I've ubuntu and xapian from stable package, how I can correct this error or I've to rebiuld whole database again? I found this http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/109 but I didnt find anything there ;/ any solutions? -- Best regards, Rafi

(This is repost of message sent to debian-user list + some additional data) my hw: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- sudo inxi -GxxSM System: Host: alfa Kernel: 5.3.11+1+kjonca x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 9.2.1 Desktop: FVWM 2.6.8 dm: XDM Distro: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid Machine: Type: Desktop

Hi ? My company network is built on Fedora Core 2 machines running samba (3.0.3-5) and windows 2000/xp clients. The domain controller is samba 3.0.3. ? When I'm logging to samba from windows xp clients and after pressed to mapped disk(share) they print out the error: ? "An error occurred while reconnecting to [Drive Letter]: to \\server\share. Microsoft Windows Network: The local

I changed default/primary group for other user than guest and issue also occurred so if domain user has default group other than "domain users", 'id <username>' always shows "domain users" as primary group. On 29.05.2017 12:30, aluno3 at poczta.onet.pl wrote: > On 29.05.2017 12:03, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Mon, 29 May 2017 11:33:21 +0200