similar to: UDP over SSH

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "UDP over SSH"

2003 Feb 24
0
UDP over SSH avalible
Hi! Greets to all of You. I placed sources of modified OpenSSH.3.4p1 for UDP port forwarding. It is not state of the art, but it should work. Waiting for comments... Lucas lucastm at poczta.onet.pl, lwalkiew at ia.pw.edu.pl --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- Tanie bilety lotnicze! http://samoloty.onet.pl
2007 Jul 05
0
model-based question-better readable version
It is going to be easy question to you. I've started to interest in model-based clustering. Adrian E. Raftery "Recent Advances in Model-Based Clustering: Image Segmentation and Variable Selection" (www.stat.washington.edu/Raftery)showed that we can compare different classification methods using BIC statistic. For diabetes dataset the best model is VVV model with 3 classes- for this
2017 May 22
1
xen-4.6.3-14.el6.x86_64
Hello, xen-4.6.3-14.el6.x86_64 is in testing since 5th of May. Isn't it production ready yet? It fixes 3 XSAs... Regards, -- Piotr Gackiewicz Intertele S.A. - operator system?w ITL.PL i DOMENY.ITL.PL al. T. Rejtana 10, 35-310 Rzesz?w TEL: +48 17 8507580, FAX: +48 17 8520275 http://www.itl.pl - niezawodne us?ugi hostingowe http://domeny.itl.pl - tanie domeny internetowe
2017 Jul 28
1
New xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/18/2017 04:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> There are new xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 in the testing >> repository on buildlogs.centos.org. >> >> Can we please get some testing of these RPMs and feedback to this list. >> > > > Any testing or feedback on these 4.6.6 rpms? It would suck if I was
2017 Jul 19
1
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, > with the one config file change) working for everyone: > > (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) Hello. Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been signalling it before: 4.9.* kernels do not work well for me any more (and for other people
2011 Sep 17
2
onet.permutation()
I saw the manual of this function but not sure what to do. I have a array contain 7 numbers and want to choose 4 to do permutation test. But using this function with parameters as onet.permutation(scores,4), it returns 0. Instead, with no parameter, onet.permutation(), it returns something but every time it's different. Please tell me how am I supposed to do it. Thanks a lot -- View this
2007 Feb 04
0
VPN Solution
Greeting List Members, I''m not sure if what I want to do is possible at all. I have an office network (ONet) with 3 uplinks. Each of these ISPs give me a block of /26 to /29 IP addresses, as my needs / demands are. Now, I have a remote server (RS) hosted in a data center, which communicates between several hosts in my office. What we want to do is encrypt the data being transferred
2003 Aug 06
0
(fwd from lordtm@poczta.onet.pl) Few questions...
----- Forwarded message from =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3 Siwek?= <lordtm@poczta.onet.pl> ----- From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3 Siwek?= <lordtm@poczta.onet.pl> Subject: Few questions... Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 9:45:25 +0200 To: mailman@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: onet.poczta X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HTML_10_20,INVALID_DATE,USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO version=2.55
2011 May 19
1
[Bug 652] pcap plugin problem
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652 Mariusz Kielpinski <kielpi at poczta.onet.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kielpi at poczta.onet.pl Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #3 from
2017 Jul 21
3
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > > I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config > file diff? I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig. It has implied several other internal configurations changes. Overall differencess (config file patch) is in attachment. But my considerations about compiled in PATA etc., instead of modules, remain
2017 May 31
0
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
Below I post the scenario where user can lost access to the file with winbindd 4.6.x (DEV2+dev2user1000 has default group other then "domain users"): root at host:~# su DEV2+dev2user105 DEV2+dev2user105 at host:/$ whoami DEV2+dev2user105 DEV2+dev2user105 at host:/$ > /testfile DEV2+dev2user105 at host:/$ ls -al /testfile -rw-r--r-- 1 DEV2+dev2user105 DEV2+domain users 0 May 31
2017 Apr 20
0
Testing kernel crash: 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64
Hello CentOS Xen Heroes, Yesterday, I have installed testing kernel 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64 from virt-xen-testing repo. It crashed today morning. Hardware is a pretty ancient, testing machine (CO6 PV guests only), but had no problems yet. It was stable on 4.9*, including testing 4.9.15-22.el6.x86_64 Console output: [59826.069427] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [59826.069463] Modules
2017 Jul 20
2
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >>>> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >>>>
2017 May 30
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
Additionally if I authenticate to user using wbinfo -a it seems to works correctly: root at root:~$ id DEV2+guest uid=2000501(DEV2+guest) gid=2000513(DEV2+domain users) groups=2000513(DEV2+domain users),2000501(DEV2+guest),2000514(DEV2+domain guests) root at root:~$ wbinfo -a DEV2+guest Enter DEV2+guest's password: plaintext password authentication succeeded Enter DEV2+guest's password:
2004 Jul 28
3
Re: Re: HTB 3.13 please help
//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented
2001 May 25
2
Winamp plug-in update
http://www.blorp.com/~peter/zips/in_vorbis.zip another bunch of bugfixes and some new features (see tag editor advanced mode) -Peter -- 26 maja - Dzien Matki. Wygraj kwiaty dla swojej Mamy! Do rozdania 75 bukietow z dostawa i zyczeniami. [ http://zakupy.onet.pl/prezenty.asp?k=7 ] --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To
2009 Feb 22
3
Which email clients support SMTP/IMAP via STDIN&STDOUT of proxy command?
Which email clients support SMTP/IMAP via STDIN&STDOUT of proxy command? I would like to be able to use local and remove dovecot to access maildir *without* running dovecot daemons. -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi at onet.eu If the future navigation system [for interactive networked services on the NII] looks like something from Microsoft, it will never work. -- Chairman
2012 Jul 26
2
ruby bindings, ruby 1.9.3 and xapian
Hello, I've problem with xapian or sth. Ubuntu 8.04, ruby 1.9.3 with rvm, when Im trying to initialize database, Im getting this error: irb > require 'xapian' ==> true irb > database = Xapian::WritableDatabase.new('/full_path/db/xapian_db/development', Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN) ArgumentError: Wrong arguments for overloaded method
2009 Jan 14
2
Personal dovecot
Do you think it wold be worthwhile to add command line options to "deliver" and "imap" to make them ignore "system wide" configuration file and use ~/.dovecotrc instead? I would like to use "imap via fetchmail ssh plugin" and "deliver via ~/.forward (to get sieve support)". Such options would allow "cleaner" configuration. --
2009 Mar 28
1
Common "sasl master" [Was: sendmail with dovecot sasl]
Hi, so sendmail can use only cyrus-sasl ? ok, thank you >Mario Pavlov wrote: >> I was wondering if I can make sendmail use dovecot's SASL >> implementation...maybe I should somehow compile it against dovecot's >> SASL ? My idea is to make sendmail and dovecot authenticate against >> one central user/password repository. Is this possible ? >>