similar to: [Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-12-10 20:14 ------- hm, i think about adding ManglePort=yes to the options. This option will create Hostkeyaliases on the fly if the port is != 22, and use 'foor.bar.com at portXXX' as an alias. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From robbat2 at gentoo.org 2004-06-11 15:34 ------- will this ever be implemented, or is it waiting for somebody to send in code for it? existing $HOME/.ssh/known_hosts file has the following format: 'host keytype keydata' where host is a either an IP or a name that resolves to the IP of the machine in

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 Summary: SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |misiek at pld.org.pl ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-03-27 21:35 ------- *** Bug 523 has been marked as a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-12-17 06:01 ------- See also bug 910 for a patch. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 dave at dave.clendenan.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave at dave.clendenan.ca ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #11 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:35 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception

The main stream is going to a Shoutcast server via Winamp. Works fine. A Relay stream goes to Live365. Works fine. I set up a Relay under SAM to point to the Icecast server running on another box on the network. In SAMs Realy section it tells me that it's connected - and Icecast seems to be telling me the same thing. Obviously I'm missing something in the setup of IceCast - I think?

We have a large install of 360's running rev 4.1 with zero problems. I did another, smaller install couple weeks ago with 40 360's running rev 5.3. In both cases, the install was identical, same Asterisk version, same dialplan, everything the same except the differences were: 1. Different firmware rev 2. Different physical LAN Guess what? On the smaller install, lockups and reboots.

Adds code to have DCE start off with a list of physical registers to be live on entry to at least one successor basic block (as mentioned in the FIXME comment). -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIXME.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 899 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Adds code to have DCE start off with a list of physical registers to be > live on entry to at least one successor basic block (as mentioned in the > FIXME comment). Looks good, but keep the comment (sans FIXME).

Does anyone have a working configuration of relaying using icecast-2.0.0 and ices-2.0-Beta4? Also, anyone using multiple streams from the master server to the slave? I had relaying and multiple streams working great using a CVS download sometime ago and tried setting it up with the latest builds and it is appears to work, but no sound is coming from the slave box. Also, some of the syntax has

can?t access mail after some upgrades. Everything else seems to be working - but dovecot seems to have caught a problem. Jul 3 09:03:35 zeus dovecot[310]: imap-login: Warning: Auth process not responding, delayed sending initial response (greeting): user=<>, rip=5.188.207.15, lip=192.168.0.15, session=<4Wk9wBNw1AAFvM8P> Jul 3 09:03:41 zeus dovecot[310]: imap-login: Warning: Auth

Hello, I try to place a call between CISCO IP phone 7905 (h323) and an analogue telephone on DLINK DG-104S (mgcp). Call setup is handled ok - both way, but after connection of the call I get both site no-audio, even codec are Set to alow-64 both. The call is terminated with this debug output - Didn't get a frame from channel: MGCP/aaln/1@dlink-1 and is Hanged up. Jan 18 20:32:55

I am trying to install R-1.4.1 on the Solaris 2.7 OS by compiling the source code. Unfortunately, I obtain a fatal error during make (apparently while using gcc to compile arithmetic.c). The configure command seemed to work acceptably (end of output follows). --(snip)-- R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C

On 02/07/2015 03:01 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 01:05:58PM -0600, g wrote: >> so much for all that. >> >> i just thought it was working. :-( >> >> only way i can get system clock to show correct CST is to set bios >> clock to CST. > > I suggest reading the man page for 'hwclock'. Namely, the --utc > option. If you

Dear David, I have the same bad password problem with my windows98 workstation. I have spent quiet a bit of time analysing this problem but still could not find any resolution. Did you manage to find any better solution for this problem? Regards KR Velivela Netnuggets IT Services +61 2 9591 5698 > Re: Problem with Samba-windows98 > > * To: "David Gunnarsson"

Hai,   I run this on a debian Jessie, postfix 2.11 (all debian packages )   Route for me is like this. -> postscreen -> policy-weight -> policy-spf -> clamsmtp (-> spamassassin) -> user     A1. I have in main.cfg    content_filter = clamsmtp:127.0.0.1:10025   A2.  Yes, you can. This is how i did set up.. ..there maybe improvements on this, but for now works for

Hello, Dom0 = Debian_Base (192.168.0.1) DomU = Debian_SQL (192.168.0.2) DomU = Debian_WEB (192.168.0.3) Debian_Base -> Debian_SQL [OK] Debian_Base -> Debian_WEB [OK] Debian_SQL -> Debian_Base [ERROR] Debian_WEB -> Debian_Base [ERROR] Debian_SQL <-> Debian_WEB [ERROR] [ERROR] = ssh "Host key verification failed" Check your entry in /etc/inittab and check this