similar to: [Bug 488] New: Patch for kerberos in clusters

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 ------- Additional Comments From smoogen at lanl.gov 2003-02-07 09:44 ------- Created an attachment (id=224) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=224&action=view) Patch for addressless kerberos tickets

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 Summary: Patches to fix ssh1 kerberos handling and some other items Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2005-07-07

O.K. I know it was too late to make changes for the next release, but thankfully there werent any changes needed. Kerberos over ssh protocol 1 worked out of the box from CVS today (2002/10/04-14:30) The krb5 patches we were using (I think from Olaf K) was all in the code. The only thing I had to patch to get things working was removing the scard-install from the Makefile.in The compiled code

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 ------- Additional Comments From smoogen at lanl.gov 2003-02-07 09:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=220) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=220&action=view) Patch for ssh_config man page Should change some wording. Written by Dave Williams ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee

(was: "Re: Pending OpenSSH release, call for testing", topic drift at its finest :-) Markus Moeller wrote: > Douglas, > > OK three possible settings(hostname,connection IP,GSS_C_NO_NAME) are fine for me too. Does GSS_C_NO_NAME relate to this bug (addressless tickets)? http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 BTW, I opened a bug the the multihomed thing a couple of

fyi. ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: nneul@umr.edu University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216 -----Original Message----- From: Richard Kandarian [mailto:richard.kandarian@lanl.gov] Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 2:11 PM To: Nathan

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ssh |Kerberos support ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi Trever, things improved after resetting user/machine passwords, however only the session key is using aes256 now, the ticket itself is still arcfour: root at ubuntu1:~# kinit user09999 user09999 at S4DOM.TEST's Password: root at ubuntu1:~# klist -v Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: user09999 at S4DOM.TEST Cache version: 4 Server: krbtgt/S4DOM.TEST at

Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:09:43 -0600 (MDT) From: "W. Scott Wilburn" <wilburn at lanl.gov> To: ssh at clinet.fi Subject: F-secure -> Openssh Compatibility We have Macintoshes running Fsecure SSH client 1.0.1 which are unable to connect to a server running Openssh 2.1.1 on Red Hat 6.2. I believe that the problem is a bug with Fsecure, since a 30-day trial version of 1.0.2 works

On 08/19/2015 12:02 AM, Ritter, Marcel (RRZE) wrote: > Hi Trever, > > things improved after resetting user/machine passwords, however only the session key is using aes256 now, the ticket itself is still arcfour: > > root at ubuntu1:~# kinit user09999 > user09999 at S4DOM.TEST's Password: > root at ubuntu1:~# klist -v > Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 >

Just a quick heads up, I'm currently working on this. It's building on -CURRENT. Yet to be done, testing on -CURRENT, build & test on -STABLE, and verification of pkg-plist currency. I will post patches to the krb5 port to -security and -ports and assuming I don't get negative feedback, I will commit sometime late Saturday or on Sunday when I return from my trip Vancouver. As

According to the authors of the original advisory, this is _definitely_ a hoax. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: OPENSSH REMOTE ROOT COMPROMISE ALL VERSIONS Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 20:05:32 +0000 From: Global InterSec Research <lists at globalintersec.com> To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com As some may have gathered, the advisory recently posted by mmhs at hushmail.com was

Dear Sir and Madam: I'm writing to you on behalf of the MIT Kerberos team and several other parties interested in the availability of Kerberos authentication for the SSH protocol. We recently noticed that the OpenSSH developers had added support for the kerberos-2 at ssh.com user authentication mechanism. We are delighted but we believe additional steps are necessary, as explained

Hi: I'm clustering a microarray dataset with a large # of samples. I would like your opinion on the best way to automatically determine the optimal # of clusters. Currently I am using the "cluster" package, clustering with "clara", examining the average silhouette width at various numbers of clusters. I'd like opinions on whether any newer packages offer

Dear WizaRds, I have been trying to compute the adjusted Rand index as by Hubert/ Arabie, and could not correctly approach how to define a partition object as in my last request yesterday. With package fpc I try to work around the problem, using my original data: mat <- matrix( c(6,7,8,2,3,4,12,14,14, 14,15,13,3,1,2,3,4,2, 15,3,10,5,11,7,13,6,1, 15,4,10,6,12,8,12,7,1), ncol=9, byrow=T )

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Celia Einhorn <celia.einhorn at gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:15 PM Subject: Fwd: Erika DeBenedictis-Recommendation To: drew einhorn <drew.einhorn at gmail.com> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David H. Kratzer <dhk at lanl.gov> Date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM Subject: Fwd: Erika

Hi: I'm clustering a microarray dataset with a large # of samples. I would like your opinion on the best way to automatically determine the optimal # of clusters. Currently I am using the "cluster" package, clustering with "clara", examining the average silhouette width at various numbers of clusters. I'd like opinions on whether any newer packages offer

Hi everyone I have a question about clustering. I've managed using CLARA to get a clustering analysis of a large data set. But now I want to find which is the right number of clusters. The clara.object gives some information like the ratio between maximal and minimal dissimilarity that says (maybe if lower than 1??) if a cluster is well-separated from the other. I've also read something

I have a directed graph which is represented as a matrix on the form 0 4 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 4 0 Each row correspond to an author (A, B, C, D) and the values says how many times this author have cited the other authors. Hence the first row says that author A have cited author B four times and author D one time. Thus the matrix represents two groups of authors: (A,B) and (C,D) who cites