similar to: [Bug 485] New: scp doesn't preserve symbolic links

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[Bug 485] New: scp doesn't preserve symbolic links"

2003 Jun 04
8
[Bug 485] scp doesn't preserve symbolic links
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-06-04 23:28
2003 Feb 06
2
[Bug 485] scp doesn't preserve symbolic links
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-07 07:51 ------- why don't you use sftp? i think skipping links is an option, but copying not. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Mar 14
1
SCP or RCP standards
Hi All, I am looking for SCP or RCP standards. I searched on the web but I am not able to find the standards. Please mail me the link where I can find the standards for SCP or RCP. Thanks, Abhijeet
2020 Aug 01
2
Deprecation of scp protocol and improving sftp client
Why can the local and remote paths be sanitized? Regards, Uri > On Jul 31, 2020, at 19:57, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote: > > ?I wanted to bring this up again due to: > https://github.com/cpandya2909/CVE-2020-15778/. This showcases a clear > issue with scp which it sounds like cannot be fixed without breaking scp. > This seems like it would lend some impetus
2020 Jul 15
3
Deprecation of scp protocol and improving sftp client
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Red Cricket wrote: > I have had this in my .bashrc for years: > > alias scp='rsync -avzP' Similar, though I named it rcp because nobody has the real rcp installed any more, but sometimes I need scp to connect to systems that lack rsync. https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=shellsnippets/shellsnippets.git;a=blob;f=mksh/rcp;hb=HEAD >
2004 Dec 08
1
dangerous behaviour of scp
When you require a scp copy of more than 1 file to a destination that is not a directory, scp copy the last input file to the destination (version openssh-3.8.1p1). Thus if you forget to specify the destination, the last file is _silently destroyed_. I know that rcp exhibits the same behaviour but cp and rsync don't do anything in that case and _kindly_ warn you that you made a mistake:
2019 Nov 04
2
scp, sftp, and special characters in filenames
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, David Newall wrote: > On 4/11/19 3:29 am, Demi M. Obenour wrote: > > I have not been able to get scp(1) to download a file with a newline > > in its name. I know that scp(1) requires that remote filenames be > > escaped for the shell, but that leads to protocol errors. > > I see something much worse: > > $ sudo sh > # echo
2004 Feb 26
12
[Bug 801] Improve usability of scp by adding a "make path" option
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801 Summary: Improve usability of scp by adding a "make path" option Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
2008 Feb 04
2
[Bug 1436] New: scp -p does not preserve sticky bit (01000)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1436 Summary: scp -p does not preserve sticky bit (01000) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at
2020 Aug 03
6
Deprecation of scp protocol and improving sftp client
I conjecture that only few of the existing use cases rely on remote expansion. In any case (no pun intended), IMHO it would be better to break a few of the current use cases but leave the majority functional - than kill scp for all. Regards, Uri > On Aug 3, 2020, at 02:50, Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> wrote: > > ?On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 00:17 +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553
2007 Jul 09
12
[Bug 1337] New: SCP performance twice as slow as RCP
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1337 Summary: SCP performance twice as slow as RCP Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
2004 Feb 10
0
[Bug 619] scp permissions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-02-10 13:37
2000 Sep 01
0
scp -S patch fix
The scp -S patch didn't seem to go in cleanly; here are some fixes against the 0830 snapshot: --- scp.c~ Wed Aug 30 01:11:30 2000 +++ scp.c Fri Sep 1 12:54:14 2000 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ extern int optind; fflag = tflag = 0; - while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "dfprtvBCc:i:P:q46S")) != EOF) + while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "dfprtvBCc:i:P:q46S:")) != EOF) switch (ch)
2002 Dec 03
1
scp "Bad address" errors with strange filesystem block sizes
When copying from a remote host to a local filesystem with a strange block size, allocbuf() in scp.c seems to calculate an incorrect buffer size, causing the copy loop in sink() to write past the end of the buffer. For example, with smbfs, the optimal block size is negotiated when the client connects to the server, and is rarely a power of two. In my case it is 64560. This loop in sink() keeps
2000 Aug 12
0
[PATCH] scp -S support
[Please Cc: me, I'm not on the list] fsh (http://www.lysator.liu.se/fsh/) is a program that keeps an ssh tunnel open and multiplexes multiple batch sessions through that single connection, avoiding slower public key crypto for things like cvs. fsh includes an utility called fcp that can multiplex file copies through this single connection. It relies on scp for the actual file copying,
2008 May 20
3
[Bug 1466] New: Document that scp follows symbolic links
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1466 Summary: Document that scp follows symbolic links Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at
2001 Sep 27
0
[PATCH] scp fixes
Hi, The following patch does two things (which you may choose to take separatly if you don't like one or t'other). Firstly, I add a -1 and -2 option, since a) it's convenient b) people keep asking for it c) it's hardly a big fix, nor does it break backwards compatibility and d) I don't accept any slippery slope arguments. Secondly, I check for and ignore filenames with \n in
2000 Oct 11
2
scp -L option
Hi there, I have a need to have scp pass the -P option to ssh to "bypass" the packetfilters that doesn't allow connections to return to arbitary "priviledged" ports, ie. ports <1024. See attached context sensitive diffs against 2.2.0p1 to please integrate. Thanx Hendrik Visage -------------- next part -------------- *** 1.1 2000/10/11 13:31:45 --- scp.c 2000/10/11
2000 Aug 18
0
[PATCH] Support symlinks in scp of openssh 2
I'm fond of the "-a" (archive) option of cp, and I'm a heavy user of scp, so I guess it's inevitable that I would eventually add support for "-a" to scp. :-) Actually, it's a "-L" flag for preserving symlinks, and a "-a" flag that is shorthand for "-Lpr". Please let me know if I'm not doing this right.... I made a great
2010 Nov 19
3
File Offsets for SCP (patch)
I don't know if anyone would be interested in this but I'm including a patch to allow for offsets when transferring files with SCP. It's pretty simple and assumes the user knows what they are doing (for example, if transferring with a wild card the offset would apply to all files). -A is the number of bytes offset from the beginning of the files. -Z is the number of bytes inset