similar to: [Bug 445] User DCE Credentials do not get forwarded to child session

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2003-05-21 00:49 ------- The existing code only handles the situation where Kerberos credentials are created by the OpenSSH's krb5 code. What would appear to be happening under OSF/1 is that one of the calls used to verify the users login is, as a by-product, creating the credentials

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 Summary: User DCE Credentials do not get forwarded to child session Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.4p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-05-15 21:39 ------- I am not sure I understand (my Kerberos knowledge isn't so great): We already set this for Krb5 auth: #ifdef KRB5 if (s->authctxt->krb5_ticket_file) child_set_env(&env, &envsize, "KRB5CCNAME", s->authctxt->krb5_ticket_file);

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-02-01 19:54 ------- I tested this with a fake KRB5CCNAME and it worked as expected. Since essentially the same code is already enabled for AIX, I'm going to commit #628 unless someone objects. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1821 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1821 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

Adds code to have DCE start off with a list of physical registers to be live on entry to at least one successor basic block (as mentioned in the FIXME comment). -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIXME.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 899 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Adds code to have DCE start off with a list of physical registers to be > live on entry to at least one successor basic block (as mentioned in the > FIXME comment). Looks good, but keep the comment (sans FIXME).

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at

Hi Guys- We are a group involved in a project to move an application from Windows to AIX, and part of the application involves reading OSF DFS shares, and making the filesystem available to Windows machines through SAMBA. The conversion of the application has gone well, but it is our first time using SAMBA and I have some questions that hopefully are not too dumb, and if they are, we would gladly

Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is

The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at

Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer

On 31 January 2018 at 21:50, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start > the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to > restart it? > > > That is not necessary. Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Regards, Nithya > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894

As promised, here's the DCE patch for pre15. (and this time i didn't forget the attachment ;) It enables ssh to authenticate, set groups and attach network credentials. It's a clean implementation (i left out the credential-move-hack). This one adds the --with-dce option to configure Some notes have rised: The for loop 3->64 closing fd's... is it really needed? Is it

Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K

Nithya, Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. All of the bricks are on separate xfs partitions composed hardware of RAID 6 volumes. LVM is not used. The current setting for cluster.min-free-inodes was 5%. I changed it to

On 31 January 2018 at 21:34, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on > these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this > mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. > > > > All of the bricks are on separate xfs

Hi All, I have a function, f(x,y) I have a matrix of data, m, with the 1st column is x and the 2nd column is y What's the best way to get f(x,y) for each row of the matrix? I tried result<-f(m[,1],m[,2]) but it doesn't work. Thanks! Bing --------------------------------- 1060 Commerce Park Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008, MS 6480 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6480 Phone: