similar to: [Bug 456] Krb5 ticket forwarding is tryied even if krb5 authentication failed

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456 Summary: Krb5 ticket forwarding is tryied even if krb5 authentication failed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455 Summary: Krb5 ticket forwarding is tryied even if krb5 authentication failed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|sshd |Kerberos support ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-03 14:43

Some people on the OpenSSH list have expressed an interest in Kerberos version 5 support. Below is a (non-US) URL recently posted for a patch to OpenSSH to work with Heimdal, the international K5 implementation. I haven't checked to see if the patch would work with MIT or MIT-derived K5 libraries. -- Mike Fisk, RADIANT Team, Network Engineering Group, Los Alamos National Lab See

Hi all, It looks like a bug for me, but I'd like to ask if someone has the same problem. We are using OpenSSH 4.3p2 from Debian 4.0 (stable), but the same problem is with original OpenSSH 4.3p2. When root logins with his kerberos ticket and then logout, his ticket remains on the machine. I found in source (sshd.c) in privsep_postauth function, that if root logins then use_privsep is set to 0

Has anyone have patches to allow OpenSSH to use Heimdal Kerberos? I suspect the patches <http://www.ics.muni.cz/scb/devel/heimdal.html> against SSH 1.2 could likely be easily adapted for use with OpenSSH. Has anyone already done this? I'm willing to test and may, if time permits, even do the port of the above patches. Kurt

What is the target version for all the KRB5 bits to be in place. I know there is very much in place right now, but I remember someone mentioning there was just a GSSAPI/MITKRB5 patch being waited for. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin at coremetrics.com "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try

Hi Are there any known security holes or necessary precautions in using port forwarding with ipportfw? I'm planning on forwarding ports from an outer firewall/router (connected to the Internet) to a host in the DMZ, then on from the DMZ host to the inner firewall, and finally from the inner firewall to some host on the inside. Thanks, Jens jph@strengur.is From mail@mail.redhat.com Wed

Patch allowing drivers in DomU to restore address bars if needed. Signed-off-by: xhejtman@ics.muni.cz -- Lukáš Hejtmánek _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=522 Summary: SIP helper(?) mangles packets even when inactive Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

On 2015-10-30 09:07, Davor Vusir wrote: > On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >>> >>> >>> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>>> I'm thick :D >>>> I don't really understand more :( >>>> >>> >>> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these

On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >> I'm thick :D >> I don't really understand more :( >> > > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more > enlightning: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and >

Hi all, Playing with delegation today we delegated rights to some user on some OU and its contents for it can modify users inside that OU and children. We used "advanced view" in ADUC then "properties" on our delegated OU, then "security" tab, and finally we gave rights to our user. Perhaps this process is not correct but we believe it is a valid process to delegate

resending to the whole mailing list .. ----- Forwarded message from kouril ----- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:50:14 +0200 To: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Kerberos buglet in OpenSSH-3.3p1] User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1025084114.12959.0.camel at mothra.mindrot.org>; from djm at mindrot.org on Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:35:14PM +1000 On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at

I'm thick :D I don't really understand more :( Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also acting as a users database. All that can be managed from Windows side or Linux side. Delegation on Windows is quiet well documented I expect by Microsoft itself and in the Samba Wiki. According to that I expect your question is about how to delegate Samba management

> That is what I did. But it fails even when mounting manually: > 1. Connect on the desktop using domain user "yvan.masson" (either > graphically / TTY / SSH). Kerberos ticket is properly created. > 2. Running "sudo mount -t cifs //ad.FOO.BAR.LOCAL/Echange /mnt -o > user=yvan.masson,cruid=yvan.masson,sec=krb5" fails with "Required key > not

On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>

On 8/30/2016 9:44 AM, mathias dufresne via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > Playing with delegation today we delegated rights to some user on some OU > and its contents for it can modify users inside that OU and children. > We used "advanced view" in ADUC then "properties" on our delegated OU, then > "security" tab, and finally we gave rights to our user.

Hi, the following from extension.conf does not work correctly: exten => 301, 1, Dial(SIP/455&SIP/456, 15) That is the console output: -- Executing Dial("mISDN/1/105", "SIP/455&SIP/456&SIP/456| 10") in new stack -- Called 455 -- Called 456 -- SIP/455-46a8 is ringing == Spawn extension (incoming, 301, 1) exited non-zero on