similar to: [Bug 456] New: Krb5 ticket forwarding is tryied even if krb5 authentication failed

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455 Summary: Krb5 ticket forwarding is tryied even if krb5 authentication failed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456 ------- Additional Comments From kouril at ics.muni.cz 2002-12-13 20:34 ------- Created an attachment (id=185) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=185&action=view) Don't delegate/accept delegated ticket if krb5 authentication hasn't been done ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|sshd |Kerberos support ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-03 14:43

Some people on the OpenSSH list have expressed an interest in Kerberos version 5 support. Below is a (non-US) URL recently posted for a patch to OpenSSH to work with Heimdal, the international K5 implementation. I haven't checked to see if the patch would work with MIT or MIT-derived K5 libraries. -- Mike Fisk, RADIANT Team, Network Engineering Group, Los Alamos National Lab See

What is the target version for all the KRB5 bits to be in place. I know there is very much in place right now, but I remember someone mentioning there was just a GSSAPI/MITKRB5 patch being waited for. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin at coremetrics.com "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try

Hi all, It looks like a bug for me, but I'd like to ask if someone has the same problem. We are using OpenSSH 4.3p2 from Debian 4.0 (stable), but the same problem is with original OpenSSH 4.3p2. When root logins with his kerberos ticket and then logout, his ticket remains on the machine. I found in source (sshd.c) in privsep_postauth function, that if root logins then use_privsep is set to 0

Has anyone have patches to allow OpenSSH to use Heimdal Kerberos? I suspect the patches <http://www.ics.muni.cz/scb/devel/heimdal.html> against SSH 1.2 could likely be easily adapted for use with OpenSSH. Has anyone already done this? I'm willing to test and may, if time permits, even do the port of the above patches. Kurt

Hi, all! I have the following environment here: - A Windows 2000 domain, with one server running Windows 2003 Server - A kerberos realm, using MIT Kerberos - A samba server, with security=ads The Windows 2003 server have a trust relationship with the MIT kerberos realm. Users logs on that kerberos realm on their Windows workstations, and are supposed to have access to the shares at samba

On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >> I'm thick :D >> I don't really understand more :( >> > > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more > enlightning: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and >

On 2015-10-30 09:07, Davor Vusir wrote: > On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >>> >>> >>> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>>> I'm thick :D >>>> I don't really understand more :( >>>> >>> >>> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these

2016-05-19 19:06 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 19/05/16 17:37, lejeczek wrote: > >> >> >> On 19/05/16 16:49, Rowland penny wrote: >> >>> On 19/05/16 15:50, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>>> fellow users >>>> >>>> I'd like to ask is it possible, and if yes what's the correct way to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=522 Summary: SIP helper(?) mangles packets even when inactive Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

I'm thick :D I don't really understand more :( Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also acting as a users database. All that can be managed from Windows side or Linux side. Delegation on Windows is quiet well documented I expect by Microsoft itself and in the Samba Wiki. According to that I expect your question is about how to delegate Samba management

On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>

On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on > your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of > write operations. > > If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, > this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot >

Hi, in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of write operations. If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot index files) but they have to revalidate the cache frequently asking to the NFS

Hi Are there any known security holes or necessary precautions in using port forwarding with ipportfw? I'm planning on forwarding ports from an outer firewall/router (connected to the Internet) to a host in the DMZ, then on from the DMZ host to the inner firewall, and finally from the inner firewall to some host on the inside. Thanks, Jens jph@strengur.is From mail@mail.redhat.com Wed

mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: > I'm thick :D > I don't really understand more :( > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more enlightning: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html. > Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also

Rowland, I used the M$ DNS Manager tool and was able to create a delegation from a subdomain to my existing DNS. DNS Manager > Forward Lookup Zones > Right-click on mydomain.edu > New Delegation > ... After this I can open, for example the service "www.mydomain.edu" normally. Where are these entries in AD? On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at