similar to: [Bug 454] New: SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[Bug 454] New: SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification"

2004 Dec 16
0
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-12-17 06:01 ------- See also bug 910 for a patch. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Dec 10
2
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-12-10 20:14 ------- hm, i think about adding ManglePort=yes to the options. This option will create Hostkeyaliases on the fly if the port is != 22, and use 'foor.bar.com at portXXX' as an alias. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for
2004 Jun 11
2
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From robbat2 at gentoo.org 2004-06-11 15:34 ------- will this ever be implemented, or is it waiting for somebody to send in code for it? existing $HOME/.ssh/known_hosts file has the following format: 'host keytype keydata' where host is a either an IP or a name that resolves to the IP of the machine in
2003 Mar 27
1
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |misiek at pld.org.pl ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-03-27 21:35 ------- *** Bug 523 has been marked as a
2003 Feb 07
0
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From august at dce.chalmers.se 2003-02-07 21:03 ------- This feature would be useful for another issue as well: I have a dlink nat/gateway/switch/dhcp thingy, and a static IP. Behind it are about 3-5 machines. I can specify one IP on the inside that gets connections made to port 22 from the outside. But if I want
2005 Feb 25
0
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 dave at dave.clendenan.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave at dave.clendenan.ca ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are
2005 Apr 21
0
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21
2006 Oct 07
0
[Bug 454] SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #11 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:35 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception
2004 Nov 23
0
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 foomzilla at fuhm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-11-23 11:15
2002 Aug 21
3
[Bug 80] Host key conflict with two servers on one IP
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80 ------- Additional Comments From eric-ossh at brouhaha.com 2002-08-22 04:57 ------- This "HostKeyAlias" business seems like a flimsy excuse for not implmeenting a feature that users want. In this age of ubiquitous firewalls and NAT, it is NOT reasonable to assume that two ports on the same IP address refer to the same host, or to the
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least > 2017, so should not cause
2005 Apr 21
11
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foomzilla at fuhm.net ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21 18:16 ------- *** Bug 454 has been marked as a
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> Host mytarget >> Hostname 172.16.1.2 >> ProxyJump user2 at bastion2 > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: [...] > The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is > unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record them ("CheckHostIP no"). [...] > Host mytarget > Hostname 172.16.1.2
2017 Jun 12
7
[Bug 2728] New: HostKeyAlias not respected for certificate authority host key validation
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2728 Bug ID: 2728 Summary: HostKeyAlias not respected for certificate authority host key validation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh
2001 Feb 19
1
Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p1
Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH 1.3 & 1.5 protocol implementation and a 99% SSH 2 protocol implementation, including sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new
2001 Feb 19
1
Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p1
Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH 1.3 & 1.5 protocol implementation and a 99% SSH 2 protocol implementation, including sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new
2004 Sep 10
11
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
2002 Jan 25
4
[Bug 80] Host key conflict with two servers on one IP
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-01-26 09:59
2002 Sep 10
8
[Bug 393] 'known_hosts' file should be indexed by IP:PORT, not just IP
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-09-11