similar to: Urgent Unix Support Requirement for Frankfurt

Hi guys An asscociate of mine is looking for around 10 Lotus Notes developers and asked me to put the word out (HTML, Javascript etc) for a large project in Germany (Frankfurt). The client needs both freelancers (contract)and Permanent(internal) people for the project urgentely. His preference is in on German speakers and the start date is ASAP. The company is one of Germany`s leading blue

You should give us a look at your smb.conf. AFAIK from my very own experience: 3.0.21c somehow behaves different from 3.0.20 with the same smb.conf. Maybe you have to set some values which did not have to be set before. MfG J?rg Nissen ----- Original Message ----- From: "WolverineJR" <jreitwiessner@samson.de> Newsgroups: mailing.unix.samba Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:40 AM

I will be out of the office starting 09.03.2005 and will not return until 14.03.2005. I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please contact Mr. Michael Klein (michael.klein@bnpparibas.com) +49(0)6971936960. With kind regards, Eric Moos This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

I will be out of the office starting 25.05.2005 and will not return until 26.05.2005. I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please contact Mr. Michael Klein (michael.klein@bnpparibas.com) +49(0)6971936960. With kind regards, Eric Moos This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

I will be out of the office starting 21.04.2005 and will not return until 25.04.2005. I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please contact Mr. Michael Klein (michael.klein@bnpparibas.com) +49(0)6971936960. With kind regards, Eric Moos This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive

You might try the free SSH client, putty (from: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/). It has a command line SCP client (pscp) that will allow you to securely copy the file from Unix box, under windows. I've used it and had excellent results. Good luck, Paul "Manish K" <manish.k at db.com> wrote: Hi I got the email-id from the web site. Kindly let me know

Hi I got the email-id from the web site. Kindly let me know whether we can use ssh to communicate b/w unix & windows(the initiation has to be from unix only), if yes then how & where can i find the releated informations If its not possible usnig the ssh then whats the other way to pull or push file from Unix usnig a encrypted way where the password is not hacked on the network. Kindly let

Am 23.08.2016 um 15:36 wrote Heinz Allerberger via samba: > Hello there, > > I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 > and dc2. > Distribution: Debian 8.5 > Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 > > The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. > But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH".

Dear everyone, Your code is slow and you are interested in performance optimization for scientific software? Figuring out where’s the bottlenecks guided by performance evaluation tools. If you are interested in porting your code to a HPC hardware platform and architecture, than OpenACC as a user-driven directive-based performance-portable parallel programming model might be a solution. What are

High there, despite SPN - registration of MSSQLSvc - Service my samba-log is littered with failures... Please have a look about it: Samba-Version: 4.5.16-SerNet-Debian-18.jessie User foo and machine tz115 are registered in spn: root at tz230:~# samba-tool spn list foo foo User CN=foo,CN=Users,DC=testzentrum,DC=uni-frankfurt,DC=de has the following servicePrincipalName:         

Hello there, I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 and dc2. Distribution: Debian 8.5 Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH". Because the message "BAD_NETPATH" I checked the DNS-resolution:

samba@samba.org schrieb: > SAMBA Digest 1928 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: NT Logon Authentication > by Gerald Carter <cartegw@Eng.Auburn.EDU> > 2) Samba-> No [.] and [..] directories > by Kai Schaeffer

Am 08.07.2020 um 11:53 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: > Hi All, > > I request your help on this. > > I have 2 dovecot test servers (IMAP protocol) installed with the following > configuration. > ============= > [root at devap01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-* > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago) > > [root at devap01 ~]# dovecot --version > 2.0.9 >

Am 08.07.2020 um 20:28 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: > Thank you for the reply. > > As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 > version. Not more than that. Am I able to install or upgrade to dovecot 2.3 > version in redhat 7.7? Believe me, there is no technical reason why you can't use the current update release of RHEL 7. Current is # cat

On 08 Jul 2020, at 12:28, Kishore Potnuru <kishore.reachme at gmail.com> wrote: > As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 version. If you have artificial constraints that limit your software to only what is available for old Extended Support systems them when that old software is not working, you need to go to the people providing the extended support and

On 08 Jul 2020, at 13:39, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: >> with broken or vulnerable software is there really a benefit? > > LTS distributions back port necessary patches Then the OP should be able to update to a dovecot that doesn't have the issue, right? -- 'And I suppose you know what sound is made by one hand clapping, do you?' said the

Hi, Our organisation has dependencies. There is a separate team/department who creates the servers for us. When they build a new RHEL system, the system will come up with various in-house softwares/tools. Those tools are not compatible as of now with RHEL8. So, our organisation is going with redhat 7.7 only as of today which is supported for all in-house tools also. This is my current situation:

>>The other side of the question is, Why is the software always so "vulnerable" and "broken" in the first >>place as to be unsuitable for Long Term Support? >> >>If the software code worked when it was released some number of years ago, then why doesn't it still work >>the same way today as it it did when it was released? Whenever I hear

> On 08/07/2020 22:24 Justina Colmena ~biz <justina at colmena.biz> wrote: > > > On July 8, 2020 11:01:20 AM AKDT, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > >Am 08.07.2020 um 20:28 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: > >> Thank you for the reply. > >> > >> As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 > >>

Iam running Samba 2.0.10 on a FreeBSD 4.2 platform within a Windows 98/2k peer to peer network. Most of the time this system appears to be working very well with the file system nicely browsable by the client machines. Unfortunately, from time to time the following error appears within the log.smb: [2002/02/14 10:54:28, 3] lib/util.c:interpret_addr(1833) Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host. ed0