similar to: From RISKS: secret scrubbing code removed by optimizers

Hi Duncan, David, Sean. Thanks for your reply. > It'd be interesting if you could find a design that also treated these > the same: > > (B ^ A) | ((A ^ B) ^ C) -> (A ^ B) | C > (B ^ A) | ((B ^ C) ^ A) -> (A ^ B) | C > (B ^ A) | ((C ^ A) ^ B) -> (A ^ B) | C > > I.e., `^` is also associative. Agree with Duncan on including associative operation too.

Hi, All, Duncan, Rafael, David, Nick. This is regarding pattern matching in InstructionCombine pass. We use 'match' functions many times, but it doesn't do the pattern matching effectively. e.x. Lets take pattern : (A ^ B) | ((B ^ C) ^ A) -> (A ^ B) | C (B ^ A) | ((B ^ C) ^ A) -> (A ^ B) | C Both the patterns above are same, since ^ is commutative in Op0. But,

Thanks Sean for the reference. I will go through it and see if i can implement it for generic boolean expression minimization. Regards, Suyog On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Re-adding the mailing list (remember to hit "reply all") > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:36 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote:

Hey, R users I do not know how to describe my question. I am a new user for R and write the following?code for a dynamic labor economics?model and use OPTIM to get optimizations and parameter values. the following code does not work due to the?equation: ?? wden[,i]<-dnorm((1-regw[,i])/w[5])/w[5] where w[5]?is one of the parameters (together with vector a, b and other elements in vector

Hi, I have the following test code print.c: #include <stdio.h> int main(){ fprintf(stderr, "Error!\n"); return 0; } I did the following on linux to cross-compile it for Sparc architecture: clang -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc (or llvm-gcc -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc) llvm-dis < print.bc -o print2.bc llc -march=sparc -mcpu=v8 print2.bc -o print_s.s if

Hi, This is my first post, sorry if not in the right format. I am stuck at a place where I have a code fragment that runs in normal gcc but fails when I give -fplugin=dragonegg.so extern int *testfunc(); extern __typeof (testfunc) testfunc __asm__ ("" "__GI_testfunc") __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))); extern __typeof(testfunc) __testfunc; extern __typeof

I am trying to do parallel programming and I tried this library(doSNOW) library(foreach) testfunc<-function(x){ x<-x+1 x } noc<-2 cl <- makeCluster(do.call(rbind,rep(list("localhost"),noc)), type = "SOCK") registerDoSNOW(cl) clusterExport(cl=cl,c("testfunc.r")) testl<-foreach(pp=1:2) %dopar% { testfunc(pp) } And this works but if I try to

Hello Group, I'm trying to learn R and am having a problem getting output from a function I'm trying to write. The problem is clearly one of scope, but I can't find the documentation that tells me how to get around the issue. Here is an example of my problem. testfunc<-function(x) { y<-10 print(y) print(x) } testfunc(4) The variables x and y are accessible during execution

Hi, I'm looking for a most efficient way to call an R function from C++ in a package. I know there are two functions (`R_forceAndCall` and `Rf_eval`) that can do the "call" part, but both are slow compared to calling the same function in R. I also try to use Rcpp and it is the worse one. Here is my test code: C++ code: ``` // [[Rcpp::export]] SEXP C_test1(SEXP f, SEXP x) { SEXP

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Joshua Moore-Oliva<llvm-dev at chatgris.com> wrote: > If I could reduce my requirements to the ability to the following: >    * Ability to know how much stack space a function requires >    * Move the stack pointer arbitrarily (the ability to write my own function > prologue and epilogue, would need to be able to insert assembly/low level >

I noticed this oddity about [ and setMethod. First, I define testFunc, which sorts a data frame by the first column and returns the entries that aren't NAs, and testIt, which runs testFunc repeatedly on a random large data frame, each time saving the return into a dummy placeholder (for demonstration's sake). > require(methods) Loading required package: methods [1] TRUE > testFunc

I noticed this oddity about [ and setMethod. First, I define testFunc, which sorts a data frame by the first column and returns the entries that aren't NAs, and testIt, which runs testFunc repeatedly on a random large data frame, each time saving the return into a dummy placeholder (for demonstration's sake). > require(methods) Loading required package: methods [1] TRUE > testFunc

I tried replacing readpassphrase() for v2.9.9p2 on Sol8 with a different version that just calls getpassphrase(). It appears to solve the echo problem when the user tries to login in interactive mode and needs to change their password. Can anyone else try this with v2.9.9p2 on Solaris? Be sure to add: #define HAVE_GETPASSPHRASE ... to config.h when compiling (since it's not a configurable

Hello! I have the problem that in my function the passed variable is not used, but the variable name of the dataframe itself?- difficult to explain, but an easy example: TestFunc<-function(df, group) { ??? print(names(subset(df, select=group))) } df1<-data.frame(group="G1", visit="V1", value=0.9) TestFunc(df1, c("group", "visit")) Result: [1]

BLAST! LLVM mailing list headers are still royally screwed up... My message is below... On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Talin<viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, it's been a while since I have posted on this list, but I've > been continuing my work with LLVM and getting lots done :) > > One question I wanted to ask is whether anyone had any advice on how to >

First off, thanks for the help so far. >From what I have been able to tell, emitPrologue kicks in after the arguments for the function have been copied. For example, consider the function int testfunc( int foo, int bar ); Emitting assembly code from the llvm-gcc frontend in a small test program gives the following for the call to testfunc movl $1338, (%esp) movl $1339, 4(%esp) call

Hi! We have started to use deopt operand bundle to make our native stacktrace deoptimizable and garbage collectable. We stumbled upon an issue and we don't know if it is really an issue on our side or really a problem within LLVM. For example, for this input: declare { i8*, i8* } @getCode() define void @testFunc() { entry: %0 = call { i8*, i8* } @getCode() %1 = extractvalue { i8*, i8* }

Dear all, I'm looking for a function comparable to switch, to categorize a continuous variable in a few levels. Off course that can be done with a series of ifelse statements, but that looks rather clumsy. I looked at switch, but couldn't figure out how to use it for this. I guess that's not possible, as it only works with characters or integers, not with intervals. Basically,

Hi, I'm trying to follow the advice from this message: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-October/017574.html, to create a call instruction from a function pointer. But I'm getting... Assertion failed: (isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file /usr/local/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h, line 202.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2539 Bug ID: 2539 Summary: Add missing sanity check for read_passphrase() in auth-pam.c Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: PAM support