similar to: [PATCH] Add readonly mode to scp, sftp_server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Add readonly mode to scp, sftp_server"

2002 Mar 15
4
PATCH: sftp-server logging.
This is another take on logging for sftp-server. Given the number of private email requests I've received for this patch, I assume there is signifigant enough interest to request it be reviewed for inclusion into the release. The patch is against 3.1p1, and is completely disabled by default. To enable logging, one must use compile time directives (-DSFTP_LOGGING). This was done due to prior
2001 Jun 20
1
SFTP Logging Redux.
Sorry to repost, but I finally have the code on a machine that has diff -u, and I've updated it for 2.9p2. Attached is the unified diff to add logging of SFTP activity to auth.info. If there is a more proper way to contrib patches, please let me know. Cheers, Jason # "Jason A. Dour" <jason at dour.org> http://dour.org/ # Founder / Executive Producer - PJ
2006 May 15
1
[PATCH 8/12] openssh-4.3p2 return code check bugs
The get_handle function can return a negative value. The variable that value is assigned to is eventually passed to handle_close which uses the value as an array index thus not being able to handle negative values. This patch adds the return code check and provides an appropriate error exit in the event of a negative return code. This entire set of patches passed the regression tests on my
2012 Oct 23
4
Disable rm on sftp
Hi, Thanks a lot for this great software :) I'm trying to do something to secure my server. I need to disable removing file or removing directory using SFTP. In other words, the user can only write, move but not delete the file. This will be used to store logs so, I need to make sure once the logs written to my server the user cannot remove it. I tried doing this by changing the code of
2007 Nov 11
1
ftp-server patch - restrict user to directory
Hi, please find a patch against openssh-4.7p1 This patch: 1) Allows for an optional configuration file 2) Allows a user to be restricted to a directory and it's children. Enjoy -- Alain Williams Linux Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information:
2003 Feb 05
2
Minor races in sftp-server.c
There are a couple of races in sftp-server as this patch shows: --- sftp-server.c 28 Jan 2003 18:06:53 -0000 1.1.1.2 +++ sftp-server.c 5 Feb 2003 19:19:42 -0000 @@ -832,19 +832,22 @@ process_rename(void) { u_int32_t id; - struct stat st; char *oldpath, *newpath; - int ret, status = SSH2_FX_FAILURE; + int status; id = get_int(); oldpath = get_string(NULL); newpath = get_string(NULL);
2006 Aug 17
0
[RFC] proposed extensions for SFTP
I'd like to propose the following extensions to the SFTP protocol. - statvfs operation - atomic rename (just plain POSIX rename() without the existence check) These are the most requested features in SSHFS, which need support in sftp-server too. They could be added to the current protocol with the SSH_FXP_EXTENDED message type. Here's a patch implementing the statvfs operation. It
2006 Aug 19
0
[PATCH] add statfs extension to sftp-server
This is needed to be able to support statfs operation on an SSH filesystem (http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html). It uses and sends only those fields of struct statfs which are common with struct statvfs as defined by POSIX, and which are shared among most UNIX-like systems. The SSH_FXP_EXTENDED message type is used, so this change is backward compatible and conforms to the protocol
2007 Dec 07
2
[PATCH] add statfs extension to sftp-server
And while we are at it, can you please comment on these patches as well, originally submitted around one year ago. Oh, and I think we can agree, that the secsh-filexfer standardization is dead, so there's not much point in trying to support newer protocol versions, which don't have statfs anyway. Thanks, Miklos ----- This is needed to be able to support statfs operation on an SSH
2001 May 24
1
chroot sftp-server [PATCH]
I'm working on setting up a semi-trusted sftp service, and to get it working, I need chroot capability. I've taken the /./ wuftpd magic token code from contrib/chroot.diff and put it into the sftp server. The main problem is that privileges have been dropped by the time the subsystem is exec'ed, so my patch requires that sftp-server be setuid root. Not ideal, I know, but I drop all
2001 Feb 21
1
sftp-server and chown
Hi, I've already discussed this issue in SSHSCI's SSH 2.2 context on ssh at clinet.fi list. My standpoint is that it's wrong and meaningless to perform chown in sftp-server as the file is most likely copied between systems with distinct accounting system where user is not necessarily (and even unlikely) has same numeric user id. The original bug report was that user couldn't
2006 Aug 19
0
[PATCH] add atomic rename extension to sftp-server
This is needed to be able to support a rename() operation conforming to POSIX in the SSH filesystem. With the rename operation defined in the SFTP spec, this is impossible, since in case the target exists it's not possible to perform the rename+unlink atomically. Miklos Index: ssh/sftp-server.c =================================================================== --- ssh.orig/sftp-server.c
2009 Feb 12
2
[patch] hard link protocol extension for sftp
Here's a patch that adds support for the creation of hard links over SFTP. Hard links are not used very often nowdays, but they do still have their uses and this is currently the most often requested improvement for SSHFS. To detect hard links the st_nlink, st_dev and st_ino attributes are usually used. I'll also post patches adding extensions for these and other attributes. Please
2014 Jan 01
0
Soft chroot jail for sftp-server
Hi everyone I would like to enable unprivileged users to share only certain directories using SFTP without acquiring root, without setting capabilities using public-key-based forced commands. In another use case unprivileged users could write scripts that evaluate "$SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" and then either execute sftp-server in a jail "$SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND" after
2002 Nov 05
0
[PATCH] Add getlink command to sftp
One of the features missing in sftp is the ability to transfer a symlink. This patch adds a new command to sftp which performs this transfer. Note that it uses messages that already exist in the protocol between client and server. This diff is based on OpenSSH 3.4p1. *** sftp-client.c@@\main\1 Tue Oct 1 17:26:20 2002 --- sftp-client.c Wed Oct 23 15:57:34 2002 *************** *** 666,672 ****
2013 Oct 14
0
[PATCH-resend] Implement SSH2_FXF_APPEND
Hi, I submitted this a few weeks ago but here it is again since I got no response. If there is somewhere else I should send this, please tell me. This patch implements SSH2_FXF_APPEND in the sftp server. It is a fairly trivial patch and applies against the proper OpenSSH and the Portable edition. I would argue that it is important for OpenSSH to implement SSH2_FXF_APPEND since it is in the
2004 Oct 25
1
Bug in sftp's chmod
Hi, I've discovered that on OpenSSH_3.6.1p1 (the latest SSH available on OSX, but I've also tried a couple of different linux distributions), when you 'sftp' to it, and try to 'chmod' some file or directory, only last three octal digits do actually matter. Example: sftp sshtest at localhost Connecting to localhost... sshtest at localhost's password: sftp> ls -l
2013 Jun 04
1
[PATCH] add restricted mode to sftp-server
Hello. These patches add a new mode of operation for the sftp server. It is located between the ordinary, unrestricted mode and read-only mode. It allows you to add files to the server, but only if these files do not exist on the server before. Changes to existing files - are prohibited. Please review them, maybe these patches will be useful not only to me. Thank you. -------------- next part
2007 Sep 20
7
Troubles with ListBox and CheckListBox events
Hi all, Here is an excerpt of code (with the new syntax from upcoming wxRuby 1.9.2) : evt_checklistbox(my_checklist, :on_checklistbox) evt_listbox(my_checklist, :on_listbox) evt_listbox(my_list, :on_listbox) def on_checklistbox(event) checklist = event.event_object # puts "listbox - event : item[#{event.int}] checked : #{event.checked?}" puts "listbox -
2006 Mar 23
8
DRY principle - how to implement?
Hi all! I have ''send_status'' table which looks something like these: id code title 1 sent Sent 2 error Sending error 3 success Success Next I would like to associate some processed records with their ''send_status''. Is it better to use: 1) record.status_id = SendStatus.find(:one, :condition => "code=''sent''").id to