similar to: [Bug 413] New: Port forwarding: [localhost:]localport:remotehost:remoteport

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sjc at makalumedia.com ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-11-22 09:48 ------- *** Bug 441 has been marked as

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #229 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-06-04 21:37 -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mohit_aron at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-06-06 12:12 ------- *** Bug 876 has been marked

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-03 19:50 ------- i'll look into this. ------- You are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-01-24 14:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=782) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=782&action=view) forward-bind.sh: regression test for binding port forwards to addresses Current limitations of test: - no testing of IPv6 - no testing of backwards compat

I found that the documentation for -L and -R was hard to understand. So I made some changes to try to make it clearer. I started with Revision 1.328 from http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1 Comments welcome. ================ ssh.1.patch ================ --- ssh.1 2012/09/15 16:08:48 1.1 +++ ssh.1 2012/09/15 20:23:35 @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ .Op Fl F Ar configfile .Op Fl I

Hi, It's a shame that the sshd/sftp-server programs do not support chroot and sftp-only users. As far as I can tell, there's a patch availble that modifies OpenSSH to chroot() based on a specific entry in /etc/passwd. Since, I personally, do not enjoy applying unofficial patches to released programs, I was looking for an alternative but found none. I've written a small sample

In 2.3.0, the per-user config file was read before the system-wide config file, so options set in ~/.ssh/config took precedence over system-wide defaults. In 2.9.9, the system-wide file seems to be read first, contrary to the man page (cf. ssh.c ll. 631-632). It seems to me that the old behaviour made more sense. (I discovered the change because I could not override a "ForwardX11"

Hi, the attached patch implements adding and canceling of remote port forwardings by communicating with a running ssh client via a control socket. Thus, one can do this: ssh -MNfS ~/.ssh/ctl remotehost and then: ssh -S ~/.ssh/ctl -O add-rforward 2000:forward:80 localhost to add a new remote forwarding or ssh -S ~/.ssh/ctl -O cancel-rforward localhost:2000 localhost to remove it. The

On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:41:05 EDT, Damien Miller writes: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Dan Astoorian wrote: > > > > > It would (IMHO) be useful if there were a way to optionally configure > > that code to fall back to the internal entropy gathering routines in the > > event that EGD was not available; as it is, the routines simply fail if > > EGD is unavailable at the

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before >> calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided.

from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> Update UEFI PXE proxyDHCP handling. This patch is based on commit ID 8a00e49 Modify two files to specify valid ip addresses. These files are efi/pxe.c and efi/udp.c. In efi/pxe.c: In net_parse_dhcp function. If ProxyOffer has been received, start with DhcpAck packet since it is the most complete. This requires a minimum of changes to the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|[RELENG] Bugs planned to be |[RELENG] Bugs planned to be |fixed *after* 3.9

Hi, there is a tiny bug in readconf.c: options->use_privileged_port is always set to 0 regardless of whether -P is specified or not. This has the effect that RhostsAuthentication is disabled even if "RhostsAuthentication yes" is specified. The (trivial) patch is appended below. Martin ======================================================================== Martin Siegert Academic

Hello I have compiled Openssh3.5 on Solaris 2.6 It works well on 2.6, 2.7 and solaris 8 but on solaris 8 it try to log in /var/adm/wtmp file and it dose not exist. What can I do to fix this. Read something about "build sol" insted of "configure"....but where do i find information about this command (build sol). Mail me on: daniel.d.olsson at telia.se Thanks

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Dan Astoorian wrote: > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:09:20 -0500 > From: Dan Astoorian <djast at cs.toronto.edu> > To: Ed Phillips <ed at UDel.Edu> > Subject: Re: X11 cookies and forwarding > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:46:22 EST, Ed Phillips writes: > > I'm guess I wasn't following the whole cookies discussion completely > >

I discovered this in openssh-2.3.0p1; it may affect earlier versions as well. Platforms: Solaris 2.5.1 and 8, probably others. Observed behaviour: With -v, when attempting to connect to a host which is not listening on the requested port, I noticed that the port number is reported as zero in the message: Secure connection to hostname on port 0 refused. Apparent cause: At line

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Brent Jones<brent at servuhome.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM, James Lever<j at jamver.id.au> wrote: >> >> On 25/06/2009, at 4:38 PM, John Ryan wrote: >> >>> Can I ask the same question - does anyone know when the 113 build will >>> show up on pkg.opensolaris.org/dev ? >> >> On

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/11/29, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a

Hi All, I just tried to test my web server with telnet. The only problem was that my web server refuses non-encrypted connections (duh!). I know that SSL and SSH are *entirely* different, but ssh is the only commonly-available encryption-enabled command-line tool around. It would be greate to have an SSL-emulation mode in OpenSSH.... Just wishful thinking, Ciaran --