similar to: adminstrivia: spamAssassin woes

Hi Jos?, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files > irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. > I would like to update this, but I'd also like to grab Jason's

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 02:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jos?, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files

I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. One functionality that I think it would be nice to have would to update a given spec file with the updated dependencies. What do you think of this? Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative

try creating small /boot partition for kernel and then rest of disk for lvm.. -- Eero 2015-04-10 22:01 GMT+03:00 <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: > Chuck Campbell wrote: > > I'm really at a loss. > > I had 5.11 running on this machine, from this physical boot disk, until I > > stepped on /bin the other day. > > > > I've tried installing Centos 5.10 and 5.11

Chuck Campbell wrote: > I'm really at a loss. > I had 5.11 running on this machine, from this physical boot disk, until I > stepped on /bin the other day. > > I've tried installing Centos 5.10 and 5.11 to this Seagate 1TB drive. Both > installs run perfectly, but when I try to reboot, grub says > Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xee > > googling this

It's sometimes desired to be able to alter login policy depending upon how the person was connecting for the ssh server. For example you might want different rules on the internal and external interface of a gateway. In another setup you might want an sshd with a different login policy running on a different port - and setup different firewalling rules (for example). I have implemented such

Hello, Albert > While we're at it, what about: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 > > This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way > (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which makes the JIT create > wrong code on x86-32. I've seen this on Ubuntu and Fedora Core 10 > (thankfully Michel Salim has fixed the FC LLVM packages now).

Hi, I'm using CentOS 4.3 on all my PC's, and I'm very happy with it. Everything *just* works. I want to give DVD::RIP 0.97.10 a try. I enabled rpmforge and kbs repos, but there's only 0.52.2 available, which has an annoying bug in it. So I installed the main dependency, transcode, via yum. Then I downloaded the (PERL) sources of DVD::RIP 0.97.10, ran configure (e. g. perl

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:30:06AM -0700, syzbot wrote: > Hello, > > syzbot found the following issue on: > > HEAD commit: 933174ae28ba Merge tag 'spi-fix-v6.4-rc3' of git://git.ker.. > git tree: upstream > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=138d4ae5280000 > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f389ffdf4e9ba3f0

"Daniel Stewart" <stewartd at codeaurora.org> writes: > You haven't mentioned if your passes are implementers of an interface > (like AliasAnalysis). No, they're just regular FunctionPasses. > What seems to matter as far as having a pass free'd from memory are > the LastUsers. The LastUsers are set by required passes. So if a pass > says it requires

I'm really at a loss. I had 5.11 running on this machine, from this physical boot disk, until I stepped on /bin the other day. I've tried installing Centos 5.10 and 5.11 to this Seagate 1TB drive. Both installs run perfectly, but when I try to reboot, grub says Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xee googling this indicates that the disk has a GUID partition table. This must have

I was hoping some one might be able to offer me some advice on a little problem I have. I am looking to A. move from mbox to maildir B. looking to move from tpop to dovecot to bring both pop and imap under the same program. anyways the problem I am having is this tpop3d mbox uses MD5 sum of the mailbox headers in hex which is option %m in the uidl section but the problem is when dovecot

At 01:42 PM 4/12/2004, you wrote: >D. Willock wrote: > >>What I saw of the output of tcpdump didn't show any mention of the yp >>url. The communications seem to run only between the client and the >>server and nowhere else. This is the dump I got: > >If I may jump in here since my previous thread/problem went unsolved ;-) > >I've got nothing for a dump

How do I get this set up? spamassassin -D --lint shows me an error... debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O: /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks and with no db present, it doesn't learn. Is there something simple that I'm missing? Craig

greetings, have been google foo for week or so. used to be super easy to upgrade spamassassin on CentOS dist. just grab the tarball and put in right spot and rpmbuild -tb spamassassin-3.somethingsomething.tar.gz then rpm or yum install and done would take just a few minutes. Yet... in regards to EL4 / CentOS 4 and spamassassin, it appears the end of the road for .spec in SA tarball

Hi, I recently saw this a branch [1] of your git repository when dovecot-antispam has support of spamassassin. Is it intentional to not add it to the official release? Are there any plan to officially support spamassassin? [1] http://www.freenux.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=dovecot-antispam.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/spamassassin Thanks -- Yann

On 10/08/17 15:37, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, Gary Stainburn wrote: > >> I have the following error message in my /var/log/spamd >> >> spf: lookup failed: available_nameservers: No DNS servers available! >> >> Having Googled the error message I've found a number of responses >> which involve patching Perl or Spamassassin or other

On 12/12/2017 04:37 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Spamassassin has been working nicely on my main server running CentOS 7 > and Postfix. SELinux is activated (Enforcing). > ... > SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/perl from 'read, write' accesses on the > file /var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_toks. > ... > Source Context system_u:system_r:spamd_t:s0

The spamassassin on my server is 3.2.5 and is stock CentOS 5.x. I do apply updates regularly. Most of my legitimate contacts are either whitelisted or sorted into folders before spamassassin sees them, but I have noticed an increasing amount of legitimate mail marked as spam. One issue seems to be the FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule. I was able to fix that via running sa-update as root per

Is there any good rpm source for latest spamassassin for centos/rhel ? Currently using from dag's, but is is a bit old version nowdays. -- Eero