Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70000 matches similar to: "[Bug 248] scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol"
2002 Jul 25
0
[Bug 370] scp incompatibility when connecting to Commercial SSH server
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
jmknoble at pobox.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From jmknoble at pobox.com 2002-07-26
2002 May 17
2
[Bug 248] scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
------- Additional Comments From liug at mama.indstate.edu 2002-05-18 07:14 -------
I tried several different versions of openssh, and got the same problem with scp.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 May 17
1
[Bug 248] New: scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
Summary: scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: liug
2002 Jul 25
0
[Bug 370] New: scp incompatibility when connecting to Commercial SSH server
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
Summary: scp incompatibility when connecting to Commercial SSH
server
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev
2002 Aug 20
2
scp with F-Secure SSH2
Hi!
I was browsing through archives and found out that somebody else was having
the same problem as I'm.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
from the client, when I run scp to the server, I get:
scp: warning: Executing scp1 compatibility.
scp: FATAL: Executing ssh1 in compatibility mode failed (Check that scp1 is in
your PATH).
There are more details about this problem here:
2004 Dec 03
1
[BUGTRAQ] rssh and scponly arbitrary command execution
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[This came over BUGTRAQ this morning. Note the call for volunteers
vis-a-vis rssh.]
- ----- Forwarded message from Jason Wies <jason at xc.net> -----
List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe at securityfocus.com>
To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com
Cc: rssh-discuss at
2002 Apr 05
3
[Bug 202] scp/ssh hangs
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202
------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-04-05 19:41 -------
this only occurs with protocol 2 to the sun?
what protocol 2 server is on the sun?
ssh.com something? i don't think they do scp over ssh2.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2001 Sep 19
0
Correction (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: x11-ssh-askpass v1.2.4.1)
: A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
: recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
:
: openssh-announce at zax.half.pint-stowp.cx
: unknown local-part "openssh-announce" in domain "zax.half.pint-stowp.cx"
[I seem to be having an unlucky day today]. See below for the
correction.
------ This is a copy of the
2001 Sep 19
0
Correction (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: x11-ssh-askpass v1.2.4.1)
: A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
: recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
:
: openssh-announce at zax.half.pint-stowp.cx
: unknown local-part "openssh-announce" in domain "zax.half.pint-stowp.cx"
[I seem to be having an unlucky day today]. See below for the
correction.
------ This is a copy of the
2001 Sep 17
2
ANNOUNCE: x11-ssh-askpass v1.2.4
x11-ssh-askpass version 1.2.4 (code name: Boudin) is now available from
the following locations:
http://www.poboxc.com/~jmknoble/software/x11-ssh-askpass/
http://www.ntrnet.net/~jmknoble/software/x11-ssh-askpass/
x11-ssh-askpass is a passphrase dialog for use with OpenSSH
<http://www.openssh.com/> under the X Window System.
Significant changes since version 1.2.2 include:
- Minor
2001 Sep 17
2
ANNOUNCE: x11-ssh-askpass v1.2.4
x11-ssh-askpass version 1.2.4 (code name: Boudin) is now available from
the following locations:
http://www.poboxc.com/~jmknoble/software/x11-ssh-askpass/
http://www.ntrnet.net/~jmknoble/software/x11-ssh-askpass/
x11-ssh-askpass is a passphrase dialog for use with OpenSSH
<http://www.openssh.com/> under the X Window System.
Significant changes since version 1.2.2 include:
- Minor
2002 Jul 18
0
[Bug 274] scp fails if target account has echo "somestuff" as last line in .profile
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274
stevesk at pobox.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-07-18
1999 Dec 06
1
New x11-ssh-askpass release available
http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/jmk/x11-ssh-askpass-1999.12.04.tar.gz
Changes:
1999-12-05 04:21 jmknoble
* Imakefile: Added patch from Markus Friedl to change use of awk
(with GNU-specific extensions?) to sed, more likely to be available
on various platforms.
X11-ssh-askpass is drop-in passphrase dialog for OpenSSH, based solely
on the regular X11 libraries (libX11,
2002 Jul 01
5
[Bug 327] monitor_fdpass.c: Expected 1 got 1075033556 - Privilege Separation
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327
------- Additional Comments From jmknoble at pobox.com 2002-07-02 04:11 -------
Could you please check the error message again? Is it:
mm_receive_fd: recvmsg: expected received 1 got nnnnnnnn
or is it this:
mm_receive_fd: expected type 1 got nnnnnnnn
? Those are two different problems, within a few lines of each other. The
exact text
2000 Jan 07
0
ANNOUNCE: x11-ssh-askpass v1.0
x11-ssh-askpass version 1.0 is available. IMPORTANT: Its location has
changed.
OLD Location: http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/jmk/
NEW Location: http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/software/x11-ssh-askpass/
Changes from 0.99 are slight:
- Now installs as `x11-ssh-askpass', with symlink `ssh-askpass' that
points there. This allows Damien to use `make ... install' to
2000 Sep 03
1
installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am
not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to
faheem at email.unc.edu
Thanks, Faheem Mitha.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh
Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
Dear people,
I tried
2009 Jan 20
1
OpenSSH private key encryption: time for AES?
Hi, all.
So, in reviewing my OpenSSH keypairs and evaluating the size my RSA keys
should be, i realized that, if i update my 2048-bit keypairs to 4096
bits, it really doesn't matter that much, because they're still
only encrypted with 3DES, which provides an effective 112 bits of
symmetric encryption strength:
$ head -4 ~/.ssh/id_rsa
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Proc-Type:
2003 Sep 17
3
[Bug 655] sshd_config.5: 'GSSAPICleanupCredentials' -> '...Creds'
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655
Summary: sshd_config.5: 'GSSAPICleanupCredentials' -> '...Creds'
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: OpenBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Documentation
AssignedTo:
2004 Aug 23
2
[Bug 919] --disable-etc-default-login has no visible feedback
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919
Summary: --disable-etc-default-login has no visible feedback
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Build system
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
2017 May 01
2
SSH1 deleted
--
jim knoble | jmknoble at pobox.com
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 19:40, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just deleted SSHv1 support in OpenBSD and portable OpenSSH. There's
>> probably a little dead code still to be expunged, but