similar to: openssh 3.4 solaris pkg & privsep error

All, We have recently updated our password aging to include setting inactivity days. We are running ossh 4.1p1 in a Solaris 8 environment. It appears that ossh isn't picking up on inactivity. Accounts that have been inactive still prompt to change passwords - if you telnet the same servers you get kicked out immediately. On the Solaris 9 servers running SUN's ssh the inactive accounts are

Hello; Sorry for the crosspost/repost, but I am getting desparate here. I am having difficulties setting up ssh (ossh4.3p2 - NIS -Solaris8/Sparc) to authenticate and allow ossh access based on NIS netgroup. So, users and/or host should be from a valid netgroup triple, contained within the ossh servers .rhosts, .shosts, hosts.equiv and/or shosts.equiv. I am having alot of trouble getting NIS

I'm having trouble with users transferring files to a solaris box running ossh v2.3.1p1 via sftp using ssh.com's windows client. The sftp client appears not to respect the users umask, creating files with either mode 666 or 600. We're using version 2.4.0 of the windows client. Any ideas? thanks, -Brett ----------------- Brett Longworth Systems Manager Department of Biology

Hi list, I'm trying to get ready the MP-104 FXO to use qith my box, but when I send calls I hear only dial tone and after a few seconds I get busy signal. I very appreciate your advices. Command line results and SIPconfigurations follows: *CLI>* -- Executing [7991696900 at total:1] Playback("SIP/101-09dd8918", "beep") in new stack -- <SIP/101-09dd8918>

Hi! I was browsing through archives and found out that somebody else was having the same problem as I'm. http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 from the client, when I run scp to the server, I get: scp: warning: Executing scp1 compatibility. scp: FATAL: Executing ssh1 in compatibility mode failed (Check that scp1 is in your PATH). There are more details about this problem here:

This is about 90% of the core work. I omited a few files from the patch set since they are basicly small blocks of #ifndef HAVE_NEXT/#endif to get it to compile. Daimen, feel free to let me know what you applied and what your rejecting and why.. so I can work on cleaning things up. Andre, Only thing of note you may want to look into is NeXT does not use "ut_user" in it's lastlog.

Remote vulnerability in SSH daemon crc32 compensation attack detector ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Issue date: 8 February 2001 Author: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf at razor.bindview.com> Contact: Scott Blake <blake at razor.bindview.com> CVE: CAN-2001-0144 Topic: Remotely exploitable vulnerability condition exists in most ssh daemon

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80 ------- Additional Comments From eric-ossh at brouhaha.com 2002-08-22 04:57 ------- This "HostKeyAlias" business seems like a flimsy excuse for not implmeenting a feature that users want. In this age of ubiquitous firewalls and NAT, it is NOT reasonable to assume that two ports on the same IP address refer to the same host, or to the

Hello I currently run a few samba servers one being used as a PDC. Today I added a user to the domain and for some reason I can not get it to connect to any of the shares but "home" on the file server. % smbclient -U gregi //server3/public Password: Domain=[HYDRIX-MALVERN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.28] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED However I can connect with : $

The memory relating guest domain should be allocated from NUMA node on which the guest runs. Because the latency of the same NUMA node is faster than that of a different one. This patch fixes memory allocation for Address Translation Structure of VT-d. VT-d uses two types of Structures for DMA address translation. The one is Device Assignment Structure. The other is Address Translation

Dear SSH community, It has been brought to my attention that is has been disputed whether the term "SSH" can be used freely as a term to describe implementations compatible with the "SSH" protocols, due to trademark issues. In particular, the owner of the "SSH" trademark argues that implementations compatible with the "SSH" protocols shall no longer be

What kind of connection delays are people seeing with Ossh 2.2.0p1?? One of the programmers here is seeing delays of up to 25s, which is clearly unacceptable. He's localized the problem to seeding the random number generator - it appears that the _minimum_ number of commands needed to seed the random number generator is 16. On his hosts (for a variety of reasons), many of those commands

Good day and well met. I'm trying to compile and install openssh-4.2p1 on a Sun Ultra-250 running Solaris 8. It's not happy about something. I've searched the bug list and the mail archives but haven't seen another posting about this. Apologies if there is one and my eyes just slid right over it. I've run a configure with the following options, and with no options at

But the main question hasn't been answered: Why is /usr/local placed before user-specified paths? Hypothetical example: You want to link against OpenSSL 0.96 for OpenSSH, but /usr/local contains 0.95, which is needed for something else. (Assume it comes binary only on Solaris for the sake of argument...) --Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at

Hello all, I've installed samba-3.0.1 on a linux machine that has a role of domainmember in an NT domain. What I would like is that there would be nothing to do on the linux machine when adding a user in teh NT domain. For that I have started and configured winbind that works fine. But I want to create a share for each user on the NT domain. I have in my smb.conf a [homes] share, but when a

hi list i've been banging my head against the wall trying to setup a samba PDC with ldapsam backend for the last couple of weeks here is the background: machine is a debian woody samba v3.0.0 compiled qith following configure: ./configure --prefix=/usr/ --localstatedir=/var --with-configdir=/etc/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-codepagedir=/etc/codepages --with-acl-support

CORE SDI http://www.core-sdi.com SSH1 CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability Date Published: 2001-02-08 Advisory ID: CORE-20010207 Bugtraq ID: 2347 CVE CAN: CAN-2001-0144 Title: SSH1 CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability Class: Boundary Error Condition Remotely Exploitable: Yes Locally Exploitable: Yes Release Mode:

I have 2 firewall in HA with keepalived. Can I use active the same tinc configuration on 2 firewalls ? using tun Interface with same ip on all 2 nodes is a problem ? tun device advertise itself on the network having an IP/MAC pairs (ARP) or the IP is only used by the system internally for routing so using the same configuration is right ? so one firewall be active, the other is passive. With this

Hello; Forgive me for asking on this list, but I've noticed that their has been some recent changes to the code with regards to netgroup.h, and hoping that someone on this list can help, I've already tried the users list. I am having difficulties setting up ssh (ossh4.3p2 with PAM-enabled [DO I NEED IT?] - NIS -Solaris8/Sparc) to authenticate and allow users passwordless entry based

On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Markus Friedl posted the following to Bugtraq: > this feature [placing the X11 cookie file in /tmp] was inherited > from ossh and the reason was: > 1) if $HOME is on NFS, then the cookie travels unencrypted > over the network, this defeats the purpose of X11-fwding > 2) $HOME/.Xauthority gets polluted with temorary cookies. > however,