similar to: [Bug 340] Segmentation Fault

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340 Summary: Segmentation Fault Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: malkema at

hi I am using Solaris 8 and installing the 3.8 openssh software that I received from www.sunfreeware.com I following the installation instruction see attachment but when I get to ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -f /usr/local/etc/ssh_host_key -N "" I get a PRNG is not seeded could you help me in this matter. Thank you for your cooperation. Spencer Crim

I upgraded from OpenSSH_3.0.2p1 to OpenSSH 3.4p1. Starting SSHD or ssh-keygen I'm getting the "PRNG is not seeded". I have verified that prngd is running and "egc.pl /var/spool/prngd/pool get" runs just fine reporting 32800 bits of entropy. My platform is Solaris 8 (sparc) and I downloaded binaries from www.sunfreeware.com. My guess is the build of OpenSSH 3.4.p1 is

Sunfreeware.com has compiled packages of Samba 3.4.2 with kerberos and ldap support included (if you also install the ldap and kerberos packages from sunfreeware.) However it does not include the nss_winbind.so.* or libnss_winbind.so.* files. Solaris does include nss_winbind.so already (since it is included with Samba 3.0.x) or I could compile it from the 3.4.x source code. But then I

Which platform? If on Solaris 10 sparc, GCC (either from Sun or sunfreeware.com) should be 64-bit by default. GCC from Sunfreeware for Solaris 10 x86 will compile 32-bit by default. For Solaris, you are better off using Sun Studio and Dmake. Actually, you are better off just using the compiled version from Oracle/Sun. On 06/13/12 02:08, prabu.murugan at emc.com wrote: > Hi, > >

I recently compiled OpenSSH and its supporting products (see version list below) for my Solaris 8 system. With the exception of options changing the install locations of the products and the fact that the versions of the software I used were current, I followed same procedure used to compile and install the products outlined in the Sun white paper "Building and Deploying OpenSSH for the

Hi all Am i doing this right? Is this the right list to post to? If not, a quick lesson in ettiquette for me would not hurt. As I am both just starting to use newsgroups and SSH, I am not entirely familiar with the processes. I have a question about ssh-rand-helper. First an outline: I am currently using the SSH packages for Solaris 2.8 available at sunfreeware.com. The environment is

Hi Phil, answer to your questions: > Which specific Slackware? Too embarrassed to say? Really, really don't know exactly. :) Installed approx. 5 yeras ago (maybe 4.5, 4.6, maybe 5.0 ... who knows now ... ) > Which OpenSSL? 0.9.6a? 0.9.6b? 0.9.6c? 0.9.6d? Only info I found is 0.9.6. Let's suppose it's 0.9.6. ;) > How about telling me how long you're going

What risk exists in changing the check for the matching version of openssl so that the final letter part of the version (e.g. 0.9.6c vs. 0.9.6d) is ignored? Are there any security vulnerabilities in such a thing? What if ssh(d) is linked against an older _letter_ version such as 0.9.6c and now finds the library is 0.9.6d? Is there a security risk in that? Surely a major API change would not

I am trying to get Samba up and working on Solaris 10. I have a seperate discussion going on about my problems getting Samba 358 on Solaris 10 to authenticate to a Windows 2008R2 domain (See XXXX) As a different solution I have downloaded the source code for 3.6.3 and compiled it The provlem I am having is it won't work with my Windows machines at all i.e. Using the 3.5.8 binary I can

I had limited success compiling 3.4.8 and 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 8/07 x86. I downloaded the source code from Samba.org and the dependencies from sunfreeware.com. After some googling and trial and error with the LDDFLAGS, CPPFLAGS and such, it sort of compiled. I need to know how to properly set things up. How can I find out what version of dependencies you need for a particular samba version?

Hi I'm running rsync 2.3.1 and when I run it with the option --backup-dir=<some_backup_dir>, I get an error message telling that the option is unrecognized. I'm using the package from www.sunfreeware.com If I'm pushing the data: # /usr/local/bin/rsync -azb --backup-dir=/tmp -e /bin/rsh --delete /home/ backup_host:/home /usr/local/bin/rsync: unrecognized option

Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc). It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA. Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes make check I have: Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in /usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin) A synopsis is at the bottom of

Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc). It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA. Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes make check I have: Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in /usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin) A synopsis is at the bottom of

Hi all, I cannot decide, please help me: http://www.sunfreeware.com/sparc/10/rsync-3.0.9-sol10-sparc-local.gz I downloaded this package and installed. The command file rsync returned a strange message: can't read ELF header - otherwise the file itself is runnable and working. Is there any way to check this file? Thanks Andr?s -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

This question is about compiling R-1.6.2 from source on a Sparcstation-20 machine running Solaris 7, gcc-2.95.3 and readline-4.2 (both gcc and readline from sunfreeware.com). I searched the r-help archive and the FAQ. The errors seem to be related to the binary readline libraries, and I have /usr/local/lib/libreadline.a,libreadline.so@, and libreadline.so.4. The attached errors are from

in some other language have a concept e.i "auto postback" So, in Ruby on rails is there any such option e.i "auto postback" or same as "auto postback" basically what i want ot do is that i have 2 select box One for "Industry" and other for "Chemical" 1st we show all the industry in "Industry" select box. if we select any 1 industry

Sorry to send this to the wrong list. But it appears that the general list is mostly utilized as a SPAM vector and/or is absentee moderated (the message has yet to make it to the archives, despite being dated days earlier than messages which are there). In any event, I'd like to know if anyone could provide me with some more information than is available in the manpages, FAQ, and other

Greetings, Trying to get current, but having problems building samba 4.x on Solaris 9/10. I've Been trying to build either samba 4.0.19 or 4.1.9 on Sparc boxes running both Solaris 9 and Solaris 10. I am using gcc 3.4.6 from the old www.sunfreeware.com site. I also have libintl 3.4.0 from them as well. My machines are domain member servers in an Active Directory environment run by

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-04-05 19:58 ------- is this still an open issue? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.