similar to: [Bug 316] New: ifdefs for systems without IPV6

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418 Summary: Allow to build on systems without IPV6 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

Something strange happens when I compile the pre27 SSH: ocal/ssh//include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/ssh//etc\" \ -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/ssh//bin/ssh\" \ -DSSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/ssh//libexec/ssh/ssh-askpass\" \ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c atomicio.c In file included from includes.h:106, from atomicio.c:26: fake-socket.h:30: parse error before

This is an updated version of my patches to get rsync to build and run its tests on the Stratus VOS operating system. I have updated this patch to apply cleanly to the current copy of HEAD. I also ran the test suite and discovered that I needed to tweak a few spots in the Makefile to append the executable suffix (VOS is one of the few systems that has a required executable suffix). There are a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460 Summary: ut_addr_v6 not used Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/167867 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-09-10 22:16

Build of 5.1p1 fails on SCO OSR6 with the error: UX:acomp: ERROR: "addrmatch.c", line 100: undefined struct/union member: sin6_scope_id configure checks for presence of struct sockaddr_in6 and uses the system declaration if found (via #define HAVE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_IN6 in config.h) If not found, the struct is declared in openbsd-compat/fake-rfc2553.h. OSR6 has struct sockaddr_in6 but it

Hi, openssh-1.2.2p1 seems to have 2 problems on ipv6 (and ipv4 mapped addresses). 1. "BREAKIN ATTEMPT" warnings from ipv4 node 2. X forwarding The following patche fixes them. Thanks. diff -ru openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c --- openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c Fri Jan 14 13:45:48 2000 +++ openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c Wed Mar 8 00:25:18 2000 @@

With the Ipv6 patch (r708), I get: upsclient.c: In function `upscli_connect': upsclient.c:469: `AI_ADDRCONFIG' undeclared (first use in this function) upsclient.c:469: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once upsclient.c:469: for each function it appears in.) Even if it doesn't break IPv4 support, it may break portability, as IPv6 seems to require specific functions that are

The Kerberos V support may still fail on hosts with two or more interfaces. Regards Markus -------------- next part -------------- *** auth-krb5.c.orig Mon May 20 11:51:57 2002 --- auth-krb5.c Mon May 20 11:53:34 2002 *************** *** 38,43 **** --- 38,44 ---- #include "servconf.h" #include "uidswap.h" #include "auth.h" + #include "canohost.h"

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Alex Vasylenko >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 >Description: rsync does reverse name

This is a corrected version of the patch I originally submitted on September 5th, and resubmitted on October 14th. I have removed the changes that added $(CFLAGS) to the link-only invocations of gcc. Otherwise, the patch is the same as before. My thanks to Paul (prj@po.cwru.edu) for noticing my error and kindly correcting me. ** text of original letter, with corrections ** I had to make some

I had to make some patches to rsync to get it to build on VOS. We are a POSIX-96 (but not Unix) system. Here is the subset of the patches that I think are general to all platforms. I have tested these here. I was surprised that CPPFLAGS is not available to the compilation rules in the Makefile. Most other packages (e.g. Samba) seem to allow CPPFLAGS to be set by the user. Since this is how I

** This is a resend of mail I originally sent on September 5th. I am still interested in getting these patches applied, and getting a new config.guess and config.sub. Is there anything else I need to do in order to get these changes accepted? Thanks. PG ** I had to make some patches to rsync to get it to build on VOS. We are a POSIX-96 (but not Unix) system.

Here's a unified diff, proposed by Christos Zoulas (with a little reworking to get the configure.in part a bit cleaner). The main target of the patches are NetBSD compatability, although there are some changes making if (pointer X) into if (X != NULL) as well. Christos also proposed a change to Makefile.in, but I'll send that as a seperate mail. Thanks, David Index: configure.in

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418 dirk.meyer at dinoex.sub.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Miscellaneous |Build system ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1491 Summary: no field sin6_scope_id on AIX 4.3.3 Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

--- .../reflection/nbdkit-reflection-plugin.pod | 23 ++++- plugins/reflection/reflection.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/Makefile.am | 2 + tests/test-reflection-address.sh | 63 +++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/reflection/nbdkit-reflection-plugin.pod

OK, I have removed the autoconf test for s6_addr32 (which is no longer used), and wrote a new test for IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED. The latter is probably portable, but since we're already in the business of testing, it does not hurt to do so. Arjen, I wonder about server/access.c, line 60-61: return (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(ip6) && ((((const u_int32_t *)ip6)[3] &

From: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan at novell.com> Subject: An implementation of key/value pair feature (KVP) for Linux on HyperV. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan at novell.com> Index: linux.trees.git/drivers/staging/hv/tools/hv_kvp_daemon.c =================================================================== --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++

From: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan at novell.com> Subject: An implementation of key/value pair feature (KVP) for Linux on HyperV. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan at novell.com> Index: linux.trees.git/drivers/staging/hv/tools/hv_kvp_daemon.c =================================================================== --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++