similar to: OpenSSH 3.4 released

Hi, I have added calls to `check_ntsec()' to the code which checks for the ownership and modes of identity files and directories. As you might know, check_ntsec() tests if owner/modes are supported by the OS (9x/ME=no, NT/W2K=yes), the filesystem (FAT/FAT32=no, NTFS=yes) and the current Cygwin settings (ntea/ntsec). Corinna Index: auth-rhosts.c

Hi, while looking into Cygwin's tty code, I stumbled over this problem: Every time you log in to Cygwin via sshd, the pty's permissions are set like this: $ ls -l `tty` crw--w--w- 1 user group 136, 2 Aug 27 13:06 /dev/pty2 Since Cygwin sets the permissions more tight to begin with, I was wondering why the permissions are this open. Turns out, sshd sets them like this:

Hi, the following patch is a (hopefully least intrusive) extension when sshd is started so that it daemonizes itself. In that case Windows 9x/Me has a slight problem with sshd as soon as the current user logs off. The sshd daemon will be killed as well. Since installing services is very different between NT and 9x, the way used for NT boxes isn't working well for 9x. For that reason

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 23:54, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> wrote: > The previous revert enabled case-insensitive user names again. This > patch implements the case-insensitive user and group name matching. > To allow Unicode chars, implement the matcher using wchar_t chars in > Cygwin-specific code. Keep the generic code changes as small as possible. > Cygwin:

Hi, the following patch fixes a potential security hole in the Cygwin version of sshd. If you're logging in to a Cygwin sshd with version 2 protocol using an arbitrary user name which is not in /etc/passwd, the forked sshd which is handling this connection crashes with a segmentation violation. The client side encounters an immediate disconnect ("Connection reset by peer").

Problem is apparently with locking issues, disabled oplocks in the [general] section, and the problem actually got worse... Here's what happens: User-A part of group1, opens Excel file off of share, saves, exits... User-B (or even User-A for that matter) tries to re-open same file, get error stating it's locked and can only open for read-only access... Both users in the same group, and

Hi, I'm been using Samba for some time and I have been bugged by a problem with SourceSafe. I finally took some time to see what is going on and found the source of the problem (well, not in the source code though). I'm partially responsible, I have Unix files with the following rights "r--rw---" and Samba does not deal with these very well. I am now makind sure that this case

O_CREAT requires a mode argument for open() This patch passes the current umask of the dd process. --- usr/klibc/klibc-0.81.orig/utils/dd.c 2002-09-03 00:49:08.000000000 +0200 +++ usr/klibc/klibc-0.81/utils/dd.c 2003-11-23 18:04:11.000000000 +0100 @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> +#include <sys/types.h> +#include

Hi, the following patch checks if OpenSSH is running under a Cygwin version >= 1.3.2 which allows switching user context without password. Otherwise sshd allows changing the user context only if password authentication is used as it was before. Corinna Index: openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c =================================================================== RCS file:

Executive summary: Why can I not have a private key which is `public' ? Gory details .... I'm new to openssh. I've been using ssh for years. However, I'm in the process of investigating RH 7.* (0.91 at the moment) and am wanting to be as `standard' as possible, so trying openssh. I looked on http://www.openssh.com/list.html but could not find a list for "general

I was running 1.9.18p10 on a test DEC Unix 4.0d box here and I decided to give 2.0beta3 a try. For some reason, I cannot connect to any of the server's shares or even get a list of it's services (via Start->Run->\\server) from Win95 clients. It asks for a password and no matter what I put in there I get "The password is not correct. Try again." I configured Beta3 a la:

Hi everyone, We are trying to port our own windows application to SUSE linux.Our application uses SetFilePerm() api defined in commondll.dll.We would like to know whether there is a linux equivalent of windows commondll.dll in wine... If not then what could be the possible alternative to make this api function exactly as it does in windows. Waiting for an early reply, Thanks and Regards,

Hello samba guys and XFS guys, I am now using Linux-2.4.5-1.0.1_XFS and Samba 2.2.2. Try to create a samba share on a XFS volume, for example, we create a directory named 'public', and set its default acl on 'public' as 'u::rwx,g::rw-,o::r--,m::rwx', . Under Linux box, try to create a file named 'file_linux' under directory 'public', On Samba client (Win2K)

Attached is a patch which adds a new config option, AuthOrder2, to sshd_config.c. The syntax is: AuthOrder2 AuthMethod1[:SubAuthMethod1[:SubAuthMethod2...]][,AuthMethod2...] An example, requiring users to enter a public key _and_ a password, in that order: AuthOrder2 publickey:password The current default behaviour: AuthOrder2 password,publickey,keyboard-interactive Require a public key,

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

Attached is the patch for the Cygwin port of 2.2.0p1. As usual I didn't attach the patch to `configure' but only the patch to `configure.in'. BTW: I have attached a gzip'd version of the patch since it's size is > 20K and I thought that it might be too big. The gzip'd diff is < 8K. What are "Small attachments (such as diff files) within the bounds of common

Previously if you were root, and you tried to change directory into a directory which was not owned by you and not readable (eg. 0700 bin:bin), it would fail. This doesn't fail on regular directories because when you are root the kernel just ignores permissions. Although libguestfs in general tries not to duplicate kernel code, in the case where we emulate the FUSE access(2) system call,

I am enclosing a context diff of the changes that I made to get openssh working on UWIN. UWIN is a UNIX operating system layer that runs on Win32 systems. For more information on UWIN go to http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/uwin/. I also ran configure using -with-cppflags=-D_BSDCOMP=2. I don't know where that information would go with the source code. Let me know if you need more

Hi, the following patch by Pierre A. Humblet <Pierre.Humblet at ieee.org> allows to use more than one uid on 9x/Me boxes which is currently blocked due to the behaviour of Cygwin's security code. After this patch is applied to sshd, we can safely change the affected code in Cygwin. Thanks, Corinna Index: session.c ===================================================================

Hi, I've sent that patch once already but it seems more or less forgotten in the tumultuous days of the latest vulnerability. It adds a new define NO_IPPORT_RESERVED_CONCEPT which can be defined on platforms not supporting the concept of "privileged" ports only accessible by privileged users but which allow everyone to use these ports. This patch removes some Cygwin dependencies