similar to: [Bug 295] New: rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[Bug 295] New: rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos"

2002 Jun 25
0
Small patch for RPM spec file (kerberos)
I decided to try openssh 3.3p1 on my Mandrake box that's lacking a complete install of kerberos. Installed the SRPM, ran rpm -bb openssh.spec and it bombed. Made it through the configure stage and moved onto compilation, where it barfed because it couldn't find the kerberos headers (I had krb5-libs installed, but not krb5-devel). Attached is a small little patch to the spec file to add
2002 Jul 18
1
[Bug 295] rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-07-18 16:25 ------- this seems to make sense. can linux/rpm/krb folks comment? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Sep 10
0
[Bug 295] rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-09-10 22:19
2000 Sep 03
1
installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to faheem at email.unc.edu Thanks, Faheem Mitha. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2 Dear people, I tried
2003 Sep 01
1
[Bug 631] Build fails on Redhat Linux 6.x
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631 Summary: Build fails on Redhat Linux 6.x Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: mdobel at
2020 May 05
0
[PATCH libguestfs-common 2/2] mlcustomize: Fall back to autorelabel if specfile does not exist (RHBZ#1828952).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c2 If SELINUXTYPE is set to some value other than targeted then we look for a directory /etc/selinux/<SELINUXTYPE> which does not exist. However this should not cause a fatal error. Using setfiles to do the relabelling immediately is a nice-to-have, but we can fallback to using autorelabel if we're unable to achieve it. ---
2009 Jun 18
0
Howto change arch for FirebirdSS rpm
Hello I have this problem: I make my own php rpms, base on src.rpm from CentOS but with my patches (more options included). I have built it on my machine originally but now I want make it in mock environment. I solved almost everything but Firebird support for 64bit arch. Original RPM from http://www.firebirdsql.org/ are made with amd64 arch but my php is x86_64. And I don't know how to
2002 Jun 27
0
[Bug 307] New: configure fails to add -ldl (RedHat specfile)
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307 Summary: configure fails to add -ldl (RedHat specfile) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
2000 Nov 21
0
Repost: PATCH: OpenSSH-2.3.0p1: specfile trivia
This doesn't appear to have made it to the list (although i still appear to be subscribed...). Bcc'ed to Damien for good measure. -- jim knoble | jmknoble at jmknoble.cx | http://www.jmknoble.cx/ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble at jmknoble.cx> Subject: PATCH: OpenSSH-2.3.0p1: specfile trivia Date: Sun, 19 Nov
2000 Sep 27
2
PATCH: OpenSSH RPM spec file problems
Hello all, There are two issues in OpenSSH RPM Red Hat spec file (against 2.2.0p1): 1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd uses 'success' and 'failure'. These don't work in Red Hat 5.2; else the spec file is fine. Initscripts requirement (for the one in RH60) added. 2. If you're upgrading over SSH ltd's ssh-server, the server will be stopped and sshd removed from chkconfig
2007 Feb 05
1
rsync 3-cvs missing prereqs/deps on osx
hi, as it's been awhile since my last attempts w/ v269, i'm building the latest rsync3-svs on osx 10.4.8; looking to see what's evolved re: acls & xattrs support on osx ... @ build, i note complaint abt a missing yodl2man, which originates with YODL. YODL, then requires icmake. as neither is available on osx, it's src build time. on building debian's icmake (already
2003 Jan 21
3
X11 forwarding problem -- openssh-3.5p1 -- redhat 8.0 -- linux 2.4.18
All, I'm working on upgrading a machine from RH 6.2 to RH 8.0. I've encountered one major (for me) snag in that I cannot get X11 forwarding to work anymore. I've been google-ing the error messages all morning, with no luck. Here is debugging output from the server (client debugging output sent upon request... I don't feel it is relevant). What I feel is interesting is at the
2000 Sep 03
0
[PATCH]: openssh.spec file for SuSE 6.4 & 7.0
Attached is a spec file for OpenSSH on SuSE 6.4 and 7.0 systems. It differs from the current spec file in the following details: - Only one rpm file is created containing client and server files. - PreReq `openssl-devel' is changed to `openssl'. - Path '/usr/libexec/ssh' is changed to '/usr/lib/ssh' for ssh-askpass and gnome-ssh-askpass. The resulting
2004 Feb 21
1
syslinux RPM build dependecy
. . . . hmod a+x mkdiskimage make -C sample all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/syslinux-2.08/sample' pngtopnm syslogo.png | \ ../ppmtolss16 \#000000=0 \#d0d0d0=7 \#f6f6f6=15 \ > syslogo.lss /bin/sh: pngtopnm: command not found ../ppmtolss16: stdin is not a PNM file at ../ppmtolss16 line 215. make[1]: *** [syslogo.lss] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory
2018 Jan 19
1
An rpm specfile quesstion
I've built an rpm package to distribute an executable and datafiles, but I need to link to the executable, with the symlink with a different name, into /usr/sbin/ If I make the symlink in the %post, it doesn't show if you do rpm -ql, and /usr/sbin/link gives "not owned by any package". If I make <build path>/usr/bin during the %install, trying to install it gives me
2010 Mar 03
2
[Bug 1731] New: Obsolete BuildPreReq in contrib/redhat/openssh.spec
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1731 Summary: Obsolete BuildPreReq in contrib/redhat/openssh.spec Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2010 Oct 28
2
adding user ldif to ldap
hi list.. I am trying to add an ldif with my users that I have derived from /etc/passwd. for some reason ldapadd is choking on the first entry... I've also tried removing the first one and predictably each one fails in exactly the same way...may I ask how best to correct this? Here is the error: LDAP# ldapadd -x -D "cn=Manager,dc=summitnjhome,dc=com" -W -f /tmp/passwd.ldif adding
2008 Apr 09
1
rpmbuild and new specfile
After extracting the spec file out an srpm and editing it, how does one execute $rpmbuild --rebuild package.srpm and use the new spec file as a non-root user inside a home dir build root? Thanks! jlc
2005 Nov 12
1
[PATCH] Use krb5-config if avaialable for Kerberos parameters
Hi. I've had this patch a while (and I posted an earlier version a while back): it tries to use krb5-config to obtain the Kerberos build options. If it's not available, or isn't in the path specified to --with-kerberos5 then the existing behaviour is kept. It seems to work for me with MIT and Heimdal. I got some feedback from one person, would any of the Kerberos-using folk care to
2001 Jan 11
3
contrib/redhat/openssh.spec question
I have a couple of questions regarding openssh.spec and the rpm that gets generated from it. I am using 2.3.0p1 1. Why is openssl a prereq? openssh statically links to openssl during build by default (rightfully so, you don't want your security library a shared object if possible) 2. I don't understand the following line in the spec file during the install step (it makes it not build for