Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[Bug 295] New: rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos"
2002 Jun 25
0
Small patch for RPM spec file (kerberos)
I decided to try openssh 3.3p1 on my Mandrake box that's lacking a
complete install of kerberos. Installed the SRPM, ran rpm -bb
openssh.spec and it bombed. Made it through the configure stage and
moved onto compilation, where it barfed because it couldn't find the
kerberos headers (I had krb5-libs installed, but not krb5-devel).
Attached is a small little patch to the spec file to add
2002 Jul 18
1
[Bug 295] rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295
------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-07-18 16:25 -------
this seems to make sense.
can linux/rpm/krb folks comment?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Sep 10
0
[Bug 295] rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-09-10 22:19
2000 Sep 03
1
installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am
not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to
faheem at email.unc.edu
Thanks, Faheem Mitha.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh
Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
Dear people,
I tried
2003 Sep 01
1
[Bug 631] Build fails on Redhat Linux 6.x
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631
Summary: Build fails on Redhat Linux 6.x
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.6.1p2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Build system
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: mdobel at
2020 May 05
0
[PATCH libguestfs-common 2/2] mlcustomize: Fall back to autorelabel if specfile does not exist (RHBZ#1828952).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c2
If SELINUXTYPE is set to some value other than targeted then we look
for a directory /etc/selinux/<SELINUXTYPE> which does not exist.
However this should not cause a fatal error. Using setfiles to do the
relabelling immediately is a nice-to-have, but we can fallback to
using autorelabel if we're unable to achieve it.
---
2009 Jun 18
0
Howto change arch for FirebirdSS rpm
Hello
I have this problem:
I make my own php rpms, base on src.rpm from CentOS but with my patches
(more options included).
I have built it on my machine originally but now I want make it in mock
environment. I solved almost everything but Firebird support for 64bit
arch. Original RPM from http://www.firebirdsql.org/ are made with amd64
arch but my php is x86_64. And I don't know how to
2002 Jun 27
0
[Bug 307] New: configure fails to add -ldl (RedHat specfile)
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307
Summary: configure fails to add -ldl (RedHat specfile)
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Build system
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
2000 Nov 21
0
Repost: PATCH: OpenSSH-2.3.0p1: specfile trivia
This doesn't appear to have made it to the list (although i still appear
to be subscribed...). Bcc'ed to Damien for good measure.
--
jim knoble | jmknoble at jmknoble.cx | http://www.jmknoble.cx/
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble at jmknoble.cx>
Subject: PATCH: OpenSSH-2.3.0p1: specfile trivia
Date: Sun, 19 Nov
2000 Sep 27
2
PATCH: OpenSSH RPM spec file problems
Hello all,
There are two issues in OpenSSH RPM Red Hat spec file (against 2.2.0p1):
1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd uses 'success' and 'failure'. These don't work
in Red Hat 5.2; else the spec file is fine. Initscripts requirement (for
the one in RH60) added.
2. If you're upgrading over SSH ltd's ssh-server, the server will be
stopped and sshd removed from chkconfig
2007 Feb 05
1
rsync 3-cvs missing prereqs/deps on osx
hi,
as it's been awhile since my last attempts w/ v269, i'm building the
latest rsync3-svs on osx 10.4.8; looking to see what's evolved re:
acls & xattrs support on osx ...
@ build, i note complaint abt a missing yodl2man, which originates with YODL.
YODL, then requires icmake.
as neither is available on osx, it's src build time.
on building debian's icmake (already
2003 Jan 21
3
X11 forwarding problem -- openssh-3.5p1 -- redhat 8.0 -- linux 2.4.18
All,
I'm working on upgrading a machine from RH 6.2 to RH 8.0. I've
encountered one major (for me) snag in that I cannot get X11 forwarding to
work anymore.
I've been google-ing the error messages all morning, with no luck.
Here is debugging output from the server (client debugging output sent
upon request... I don't feel it is relevant). What I feel is interesting
is at the
2000 Sep 03
0
[PATCH]: openssh.spec file for SuSE 6.4 & 7.0
Attached is a spec file for OpenSSH on SuSE 6.4 and 7.0 systems.
It differs from the current spec file in the following details:
- Only one rpm file is created containing client and server files.
- PreReq `openssl-devel' is changed to `openssl'.
- Path '/usr/libexec/ssh' is changed to '/usr/lib/ssh' for
ssh-askpass and gnome-ssh-askpass.
The resulting
2004 Feb 21
1
syslinux RPM build dependecy
.
.
.
.
hmod a+x mkdiskimage
make -C sample all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/syslinux-2.08/sample'
pngtopnm syslogo.png | \
../ppmtolss16 \#000000=0 \#d0d0d0=7 \#f6f6f6=15 \
> syslogo.lss
/bin/sh: pngtopnm: command not found
../ppmtolss16: stdin is not a PNM file at ../ppmtolss16 line 215.
make[1]: *** [syslogo.lss] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory
2018 Jan 19
1
An rpm specfile quesstion
I've built an rpm package to distribute an executable and datafiles, but I
need to link to the executable, with the symlink with a different name,
into /usr/sbin/
If I make the symlink in the %post, it doesn't show if you do rpm -ql, and
/usr/sbin/link gives "not owned by any package". If I make <build
path>/usr/bin during the %install, trying to install it gives me
2010 Mar 03
2
[Bug 1731] New: Obsolete BuildPreReq in contrib/redhat/openssh.spec
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1731
Summary: Obsolete BuildPreReq in contrib/redhat/openssh.spec
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.4p1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2010 Oct 28
2
adding user ldif to ldap
hi list.. I am trying to add an ldif with my users that I have derived
from /etc/passwd. for some reason ldapadd is choking on the first
entry... I've also tried removing the first one and predictably each
one fails in exactly the same way...may I ask how best to correct
this?
Here is the error:
LDAP# ldapadd -x -D "cn=Manager,dc=summitnjhome,dc=com" -W -f /tmp/passwd.ldif
adding
2008 Apr 09
1
rpmbuild and new specfile
After extracting the spec file out an srpm and editing it, how does one execute $rpmbuild --rebuild package.srpm and use the new spec file as a non-root user inside a home dir build root?
Thanks!
jlc
2005 Nov 12
1
[PATCH] Use krb5-config if avaialable for Kerberos parameters
Hi.
I've had this patch a while (and I posted an earlier version a while
back): it tries to use krb5-config to obtain the Kerberos build options.
If it's not available, or isn't in the path specified to --with-kerberos5
then the existing behaviour is kept.
It seems to work for me with MIT and Heimdal. I got some feedback from one
person, would any of the Kerberos-using folk care to
2001 Jan 11
3
contrib/redhat/openssh.spec question
I have a couple of questions regarding openssh.spec and the rpm that
gets generated from it. I am using 2.3.0p1
1. Why is openssl a prereq? openssh statically links to openssl during
build by default (rightfully so, you don't want your security library a
shared object if possible)
2. I don't understand the following line in the spec file during the
install step (it makes it not build for