similar to: Require multiple methods of authentication.. status...

Hi, I have a feature request in sshd. A feature that only allows user who passes both public key and password authentication to login. Alex

I haven''t seen any mention of it in this forum yet, so FWIW you might be interested in the details of ZFS deduplication mentioned in this recently-filed case. Case log: http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/571/ Discussion: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=115507 Very nice -- I like the interaction with "copies", and (like a few others) I think

fyi http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~msfriedl/openssh/TODO

Hi, I don't mean to be annoying, but it seems like there isn't any interest in partial authentication. Is this true? It's not a future plan for OpenSSH to have this feature? I'd just like to know if I'm on my own or not. Thanks Erik.

On 2/17/16 6:02 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Carson Gaspar <carson at taltos.org> wrote: > [...] >> Is there a sane way to run just one test script? LTESTS can't be overridden >> AFAIK... > > make t-exec LTESTS=testname > > where testname is the name of the specific test script without the .sh > extension. Nope, that runs

Here is a new version of my partial auth patch against the April 24, 2001 CVS image. It fixes a couple of things (thanks to Karl M <karlm30 at hotmail.com>), and includes support for hostbased auth. It's still not pretty, but it works. 2 things Karl mentioned aren't fixed: - auth methods are still hard-coded into servconf.c. Fixing this would require a lot of work, and all the

I store my file_column database outside of my RAILS_ROOT. It seems to work in real life, but not in tests. In the tests, I can''t set both the root_path and the store_dir. In tests, setting the store_dir option will override the root_path option. The only way for root_path to work is to remove store_dir. I think the problem is in file_column.rb on line 22: options[:store_dir]

steve wrote: > > My only remaining question is that to open port 22 on the file server, > I've had to open all the other ports otherwise I could not kinit or > anything else. Could you/is there a list of ports which need to be > open for a S3 fileserver which is also a nfs server to be able to > communicate to the rest of the LAN without all ports being opened? > >

Hi Rowland, Thanks for your explanation. We have set up Samba to authenticate users against an external MIT Kerberos server and usernames match those in Unix password files. The setup was almost exactly like the Ubuntu help page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Samba/Kerberos#MIT_Kerberos There are others who have also set up Samba this way:

On 2/17/16 3:02 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote: > > Sadly I'm hitting a different autoconf bug :-( I was being an idiot - configure was bombing out & I didn't notice (boy that openssl version error message is loooooong...) With Mr. Wilson's patch, I still get: "sandbox-solaris.c", line 22: #error: "--with-solaris-privs must be used with the Solaris sandbox"

Apparently my ssh agent is feeling energetic today: debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering RSA public key: [...] debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Offering RSA public key: [...] debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Offering RSA public key:

Hi, I'm running OpenSSH 3.8 & 3.9, compiled against Heimdal 0.6.3 for it's GSSAPI & AFS integration. A couple weeks ago, we upgraded our MIT KDC from (ugh) Kerberos 5 1.0.6 to the lastest and greatest 1.3.5. However, it seems that as part of the upgrade, our GSSAPI credentials passing in OpenSSH stopped working. Actually, didn't completely stop... You can still do a

Dear list, I'm wondering if anyone can help me calculate the deviance of either a zeroinfl or hurdle model from package pscl? Even if someone could point me to the correct formula for calculating the deviance, I could do the rest on my own. I am trying to calculate a pseudo-R-squared measure based on the R^{2}_{DEV} of [1], so I need to be able to calculate the deviance of the full and null

Bug: all .out files get rebuilt every make. This is silly, and breaks make install if root cannot write to your build dir. Fix: add dependancy check sop .out files only get rebuilt if the source file changes FixBug: if any source file gets changed, all .out files get rebuilt. This is because man pages and config files both get .out extensions but get created differently. It's

On 2/17/16 9:50 AM, Carson Gaspar wrote: > Solaris 10 has setppriv, but does not have priv_basicset. To work on > Solaris 10, the call would need to be replaced with the equivalent set > of explicitly listed privs: The prior art in other apps on the system seems to suggest that priv_str_to_set is a better fallback if priv_basicset is not available. I've attached a patch that seems

I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for discussion only, unless someone else can try it :) Modern versions of MIT kerberos support GSS-SPNEGO natively, but are only willing to negotiate for kerberos tickets and not NTLM

If HostbasedUsesNameFromPacketOnly is set to yes, sshd does not remove the trailing dot from the client supplied hostname, causing sshd to attempt to look up "foo.example.com." (note trailing period) in known_hosts and .shosts instead of "foo.example.com" Trivial patch attached. -- Carson -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was

Recently configured postfix to use the dovecot lda as I wanted to use sieve. Got that working a few days ago but noticed that I wasn't getting any emails to aliases. Checked the logs and saw messages like: Mar 1 08:19:59 carson postfix/lmtp[16949]: 0DCD22016BE: to=< sales at example.com>, relay=carson.example.com[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=0.07, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.04, dsn=5.1.1,

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Richard Elling <Richard.Elling at sun.com> wrote: > Philip Brown wrote: >> I''ve recently started down the road of production use for zfs, and am hitting my head on some paradigm shifts. I''d like to clarify whether my understanding is correct, and/or whether there are better ways of doing things. >> I have one question for

Hello R community, Does anyone know of a package that will perform cycle regression analysis? I have searched the R-help archives etc. but have come up with nothing so far. If I am unable to find an existing R package to do so, is there anyone familiar with fitting sine functions to data. My problem is this: I have a long time-series of daily SWE estimates (SWE = snow water equivalence, or