similar to: SOCKS4 OS Shim for Windows -- GPL!

Hi all. I was getting something working over socks5 and was trying to figure out why it kept using socks4. It wasn't, it was just a misleading debug message.... Patch applies to either OpenBSD or Portable. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

Am Di, 20. Feb 2018, 23:13:16 -0800 schrieb Dan Kaminsky: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 > From: Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> > To: J? Fahlke <jorrit at jorrit.de> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Re: Is there socksify script for dynamics forwardings to unix > domain sockets? > > Whoa. That's pretty cool. > >

Hi! I noticed that `ssh -D /tmp/socket $myhost` will actually provide a socks server listing on the unix domain socket /tmp/socket (this does not appear to be documented, though it is semi-documented for -L and -R). Do you know of any "socksification" script to go along with it, in the spirit of tsocks of socksify (from dante)? Those do not seem to support socks servers running on

> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS

I have a few patches for AIX. The patchfile is attached below. The patch has been tested on AIX4.2 and AIX4.3. The patch is on openssh-1.2.1pre25, with openssl-0.94, using RSAref. 1) authenticate support - this function allows the system to determine authentification. Whatever the system allows for login, authenticate will too. It doesn't matter whether it is AFS, DFS, SecureID, local.

Then you are in violation of section 3 of the GPL as printed at http://oss.snapappliance.com/license.html Samba is licensed under the GPL, and the version in SNAP is modified. I'd like the modifications. The modifications available at oss.snapappliance.com are old. -Tom > Hi Tom, > > I am terribly sorry but this is Confidential information that cannot be > distributed outside

Hello Tom, The update has been posted to http://oss.snapappliance.com We apologize for the delay in updating the source code page. Have a nice day -Sean -----Original Message----- From: Tom Dickson [mailto:bombcar@bombcar.com] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:20 AM To: Support, Snap Subject: Re: Can I get the GPL source for the Samba version used in the Gu ardian OS? Thank you very much!

is openssh going to ever contain socks4/5 proxy support (http://www.socks.nec.com/) the same way ssh (nonfree version) does? Without this support, openssh is completely unusable behind a firewall. Hayden A. James

Just to make sure somebody reacts (please) I'm forwarding this. Please cc me on replies as I'm not subscribed to this list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [RESEND] 2.4.20: ext3: Assertion failure in journal_forget()/Oops on another system Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:27:31 +0100 From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List

I have two servers running Samba, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10 and running smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end. I am having a problem understanding ID mapping. The mapping is not the same on both machines. On the Domain Controller > root at thelma:/etc/init.d# wbinfo -i 'ATLANTA\rob' > rob:*:1000:2003:Robert

Once upon a time, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> said: > The issues should now be resolved. > > If you just mount /mnt/sysimage, set an ip address and upgrade (to get > th new shim) .. then: > > yum reinstall <latest-version> I'm curious - why does the kernel need to be reinstalled? The shim-x64 package installs its files directly to the EFI partition

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:C001 This is a bug fix for for the following CentOS Bug: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 0ae55996308b507ba878377b35b71225c1fa28d4fb453c938a0d5dc9568501cc mokutil-15-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm

When we consolidated all CentOS Distro builders in a new centralized setup, covering all arches (so basically x86_64, i386, ppc64le, ppc64, aarch64 and armhfp those days), we wanted also to add redundancy where it was possible to. The interesting "SecureBoot" corner case came on the table and we had to find a different way to build the following packages: - shim (both signed and

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 01:25, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz <caskater47 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I was able to find this thread that seems to be the same problem I am > having. > > https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d861e179-6515-4322-a628-b7e73b2335e8/cannot-add-a-microsoft-account-to-domain-account-with-roaming-profiles?forum=win10itprogeneral > > When

I was able to find this thread that seems to be the same problem I am having. https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d861e179-6515-4322-a628-b7e73b2335e8/cannot-add-a-microsoft-account-to-domain-account-with-roaming-profiles?forum=win10itprogeneral When provisioning a new AD domain controller in samba, I assume the default behavior is that all user profiles are set to roaming? On

My desire is to form a connection from my laptop running ubuntu to a SOCKS5 server listed on the Internet. I have read the Ubuntu man page on OpenSSH client program. The description indicates that I have to connect to given host name (assumed to be an ip address?) with optional username. I want the server receive my Internet traffic in SOCKS5 protocol and respond to my computer the requested

<snip> >Your system was most likely rebuilding the initrd, and you interrupted >it leaving you with a broken initrd. > >Try booting off a rescue disk and chroot into the install, and run: > >dracut -f -v > >to regenerate all the initrds. > >Also, you don't need to reinstall the kernel but just do a 'yum >update' to get everything up to the latest